Alternatives to Konva logo

Alternatives to Konva

Fabric, React Canvas, Fabric.js, Pixi, and D3.js are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Konva.
26
98
+ 1
0

What is Konva and what are its top alternatives?

Konva is a powerful HTML5 2d canvas library that enables high-performance animations, shapes, and interactive content for web applications. Its key features include a declarative API, event handling, drag and drop functionality, and support for both desktop and mobile devices. However, Konva may have limitations in terms of complex 3D rendering and advanced animations.

  1. PixiJS: PixiJS is a popular 2D rendering engine that is lightweight and fast, making it ideal for creating interactive animations. It offers support for WebGL and canvas rendering, as well as filters and effects. Pros include high performance and flexibility, while cons may include a steeper learning curve compared to Konva.

  2. Paper.js: Paper.js is a vector graphics scripting framework that simplifies creating visual effects and interactions. It provides ease of use for handling complex graphic elements and animations. Pros include robust vector graphics capabilities, while cons may include limited built-in UI components.

  3. Fabric.js: Fabric.js is a powerful JavaScript library for interactive graphic design with canvas elements. It offers object manipulation, animation, and image filtering. Pros include a rich set of built-in features, while cons may include performance issues with a large number of objects on the canvas.

  4. p5.js: p5.js is a JavaScript library that simplifies creative coding for visual artists, designers, and educators. It provides a beginner-friendly approach to creating interactive visual content. Pros include a large community and extensive documentation, while cons may include less focus on high-performance animations.

  5. Three.js: Three.js is a popular 3D graphics library that enables the creation of 3D content using WebGL. It offers a wide range of features for building immersive 3D experiences. Pros include advanced 3D rendering capabilities, while cons may include a steep learning curve for beginners.

  6. D3.js: D3.js is a powerful data visualization library for creating interactive charts and graphs. It provides flexibility in designing custom data-driven visualizations. Pros include extensive data manipulation capabilities, while cons may include a focus on data visualization rather than general graphics.

  7. Babylon.js: Babylon.js is a comprehensive 3D game engine that allows the creation of immersive 3D games and simulations. It supports both WebGL and WebXR rendering. Pros include advanced 3D game development features, while cons may include a higher level of complexity compared to Konva.

  8. PlayCanvas: PlayCanvas is an open-source web-based game engine that enables the creation of 3D games and interactive content. It offers a visual editor for building scenes and supports WebGL rendering. Pros include collaborative development tools, while cons may include limitations in customization compared to Konva.

  9. Snap.svg: Snap.svg is a lightweight JavaScript library for animating and manipulating SVG content. It provides a simple API for working with scalable vector graphics. Pros include SVG animation capabilities, while cons may include limited support for complex canvas rendering.

  10. CreateJS: CreateJS is a suite of JavaScript libraries for building interactive content, including EaselJS for working with HTML5 canvas elements. It offers tools for creating animations, interactivity, and game development. Pros include a modular architecture for different use cases, while cons may include a larger file size compared to Konva.

Top Alternatives to Konva

  • Fabric
    Fabric

    Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution. ...

  • React Canvas
    React Canvas

    React Canvas adds the ability for React components to render to "canvas" rather than DOM. This project is a work-in-progress. Though much of the code is in production on flipboard.com, the React canvas bindings are relatively new and the API is subject to change. ...

  • Fabric.js
    Fabric.js

    It provides interactive object model on top of canvas element. Fabric also has SVG-to-canvas (and canvas-to-SVG) parser. Using Fabric.js, you can create and populate objects on canvas; objects like simple geometrical shapes ...

  • Pixi
    Pixi

    Super fast HTML 5 2D rendering engine that uses webGL with canvas fallback

  • D3.js
    D3.js

    It is a JavaScript library for manipulating documents based on data. Emphasises on web standards gives you the full capabilities of modern browsers without tying yourself to a proprietary framework. ...

  • jQuery
    jQuery

    jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML. ...

  • React
    React

    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. ...

  • AngularJS
    AngularJS

    AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding. ...

Konva alternatives & related posts

Fabric logo

Fabric

451
75
Simple, Pythonic remote execution and deployment
451
75
PROS OF FABRIC
  • 23
    Python
  • 21
    Simple
  • 5
    Low learning curve, from bash script to Python power
  • 5
    Installation feedback for Twitter App Cards
  • 3
    Easy on maintainance
  • 3
    Single config file
  • 3
    Installation? pip install fabric... Boom
  • 3
    Easy to add any type of job
  • 3
    Agentless
  • 2
    Easily automate any set system automation
  • 1
    Flexible
  • 1
    Crash Analytics
  • 1
    Backward compatibility
  • 1
    Remote sudo execution
CONS OF FABRIC
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Fabric posts

    React Canvas logo

    React Canvas

    11
    0
    High performance canvas rendering for React components, developed by Flipboard
    11
    0
    PROS OF REACT CANVAS
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF REACT CANVAS
        Be the first to leave a con

        related React Canvas posts

        Fabric.js logo

        Fabric.js

        57
        0
        Powerful and simple Javascript HTML5 canvas library
        57
        0
        PROS OF FABRIC.JS
          Be the first to leave a pro
          CONS OF FABRIC.JS
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Fabric.js posts

            Pixi logo

            Pixi

            87
            8
            Create beautiful digital content with the fastest, most flexible 2D WebGL renderer
            87
            8
            PROS OF PIXI
            • 8
              Fast Performance
            CONS OF PIXI
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Pixi posts

              D3.js logo

              D3.js

              1.9K
              653
              A JavaScript visualization library for HTML and SVG
              1.9K
              653
              PROS OF D3.JS
              • 195
                Beautiful visualizations
              • 103
                Svg
              • 92
                Data-driven
              • 81
                Large set of examples
              • 61
                Data-driven documents
              • 24
                Visualization components
              • 20
                Transitions
              • 18
                Dynamic properties
              • 16
                Plugins
              • 11
                Transformation
              • 7
                Makes data interactive
              • 4
                Open Source
              • 4
                Enter and Exit
              • 4
                Components
              • 3
                Exhaustive
              • 3
                Backed by the new york times
              • 2
                Easy and beautiful
              • 1
                Highly customizable
              • 1
                Awesome Community Support
              • 1
                Simple elegance
              • 1
                Templates, force template
              • 1
                Angular 4
              CONS OF D3.JS
              • 11
                Beginners cant understand at all
              • 6
                Complex syntax

              related D3.js posts

              Tim Abbott
              Shared insights
              on
              Plotly.jsPlotly.jsD3.jsD3.js
              at

              We use Plotly (just their open source stuff) for Zulip's user-facing and admin-facing statistics graphs because it's a reasonably well-designed JavaScript graphing library.

              If you've tried using D3.js, it's a pretty poor developer experience, and that translates to spending a bunch of time getting the graphs one wants even for things that are conceptually pretty basic. Plotly isn't amazing (it's decent), but it's way better than than D3 unless you have very specialized needs.

              See more
              Amit Garg
              Shared insights
              on
              D3.jsD3.jsApexChartsApexChartsReactReact

              Hi,

              I am looking at integrating a charting library in my React frontend that allows me to create appealing and interactive charts. I have basic familiarity with ApexCharts with React but have also read about D3.js charts and it seems a much more involved integration. Can someone please share their experience across the two libraries on the following dimensions:

              1. Amount of work needed for integration
              2. Amount of work or ease for creating new charts in either of the libraries.

              Regards

              Amit

              See more
              jQuery logo

              jQuery

              192.9K
              6.6K
              The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.
              192.9K
              6.6K
              PROS OF JQUERY
              • 1.3K
                Cross-browser
              • 957
                Dom manipulation
              • 809
                Power
              • 660
                Open source
              • 610
                Plugins
              • 459
                Easy
              • 395
                Popular
              • 350
                Feature-rich
              • 281
                Html5
              • 227
                Light weight
              • 93
                Simple
              • 84
                Great community
              • 79
                CSS3 Compliant
              • 69
                Mobile friendly
              • 67
                Fast
              • 43
                Intuitive
              • 42
                Swiss Army knife for webdev
              • 35
                Huge Community
              • 11
                Easy to learn
              • 4
                Clean code
              • 3
                Because of Ajax request :)
              • 2
                Powerful
              • 2
                Nice
              • 2
                Just awesome
              • 2
                Used everywhere
              • 1
                Improves productivity
              • 1
                Javascript
              • 1
                Easy Setup
              • 1
                Open Source, Simple, Easy Setup
              • 1
                It Just Works
              • 1
                Industry acceptance
              • 1
                Allows great manipulation of HTML and CSS
              • 1
                Widely Used
              • 1
                I love jQuery
              CONS OF JQUERY
              • 6
                Large size
              • 5
                Sometimes inconsistent API
              • 5
                Encourages DOM as primary data source
              • 2
                Live events is overly complex feature

              related jQuery posts

              Kir Shatrov
              Engineering Lead at Shopify · | 22 upvotes · 2.5M views

              The client-side stack of Shopify Admin has been a long journey. It started with HTML templates, jQuery and Prototype. We moved to Batman.js, our in-house Single-Page-Application framework (SPA), in 2013. Then, we re-evaluated our approach and moved back to statically rendered HTML and vanilla JavaScript. As the front-end ecosystem matured, we felt that it was time to rethink our approach again. Last year, we started working on moving Shopify Admin to React and TypeScript.

              Many things have changed since the days of jQuery and Batman. JavaScript execution is much faster. We can easily render our apps on the server to do less work on the client, and the resources and tooling for developers are substantially better with React than we ever had with Batman.

              #FrameworksFullStack #Languages

              See more
              Ganesa Vijayakumar
              Full Stack Coder | Technical Architect · | 19 upvotes · 5.7M views

              I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

              I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

              As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

              UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

              Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

              Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

              Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

              Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

              Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

              Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

              Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

              Thanks, Ganesa

              See more
              React logo

              React

              175K
              4.1K
              A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
              175K
              4.1K
              PROS OF REACT
              • 837
                Components
              • 673
                Virtual dom
              • 578
                Performance
              • 509
                Simplicity
              • 442
                Composable
              • 186
                Data flow
              • 166
                Declarative
              • 128
                Isn't an mvc framework
              • 120
                Reactive updates
              • 115
                Explicit app state
              • 50
                JSX
              • 29
                Learn once, write everywhere
              • 22
                Easy to Use
              • 21
                Uni-directional data flow
              • 17
                Works great with Flux Architecture
              • 11
                Great perfomance
              • 10
                Javascript
              • 9
                Built by Facebook
              • 8
                TypeScript support
              • 6
                Speed
              • 6
                Server Side Rendering
              • 6
                Scalable
              • 5
                Easy to start
              • 5
                Feels like the 90s
              • 5
                Awesome
              • 5
                Props
              • 5
                Cross-platform
              • 5
                Closer to standard JavaScript and HTML than others
              • 5
                Easy as Lego
              • 5
                Functional
              • 5
                Excellent Documentation
              • 5
                Hooks
              • 4
                Scales super well
              • 4
                Allows creating single page applications
              • 4
                Sdfsdfsdf
              • 4
                Start simple
              • 4
                Strong Community
              • 4
                Super easy
              • 4
                Server side views
              • 4
                Fancy third party tools
              • 3
                Rich ecosystem
              • 3
                Has arrow functions
              • 3
                Very gentle learning curve
              • 3
                Beautiful and Neat Component Management
              • 3
                Just the View of MVC
              • 3
                Simple, easy to reason about and makes you productive
              • 3
                Fast evolving
              • 3
                SSR
              • 3
                Great migration pathway for older systems
              • 3
                Simple
              • 3
                Has functional components
              • 3
                Every decision architecture wise makes sense
              • 2
                Sharable
              • 2
                Permissively-licensed
              • 2
                HTML-like
              • 2
                Image upload
              • 2
                Recharts
              • 2
                Fragments
              • 2
                Split your UI into components with one true state
              • 1
                React hooks
              • 1
                Datatables
              CONS OF REACT
              • 41
                Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
              • 30
                No predefined way to structure your app
              • 29
                Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
              • 13
                JSX
              • 10
                Not enterprise friendly
              • 6
                One-way binding only
              • 3
                State consistency with backend neglected
              • 3
                Bad Documentation
              • 2
                Error boundary is needed
              • 2
                Paradigms change too fast

              related React posts

              Johnny Bell

              I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

              I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

              I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

              Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

              Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

              With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

              If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

              See more
              Collins Ogbuzuru
              Front-end dev at Evolve credit · | 47 upvotes · 342.8K views

              Your tech stack is solid for building a real-time messaging project.

              React and React Native are excellent choices for the frontend, especially if you want to have both web and mobile versions of your application share code.

              ExpressJS is an unopinionated framework that affords you the flexibility to use it's features at your term, which is a good start. However, I would recommend you explore Sails.js as well. Sails.js is built on top of Express.js and it provides additional features out of the box, especially the Websocket integration that your project requires.

              Don't forget to set up Graphql codegen, this would improve your dev experience (Add Typescript, if you can too).

              I don't know much about databases but you might want to consider using NO-SQL. I used Firebase real-time db and aws dynamo db on a few of my personal projects and I love they're easy to work with and offer more flexibility for a chat application.

              See more
              AngularJS logo

              AngularJS

              61.3K
              5.3K
              Superheroic JavaScript MVW Framework
              61.3K
              5.3K
              PROS OF ANGULARJS
              • 889
                Quick to develop
              • 589
                Great mvc
              • 573
                Powerful
              • 520
                Restful
              • 505
                Backed by google
              • 349
                Two-way data binding
              • 343
                Javascript
              • 329
                Open source
              • 307
                Dependency injection
              • 197
                Readable
              • 75
                Fast
              • 65
                Directives
              • 63
                Great community
              • 57
                Free
              • 38
                Extend html vocabulary
              • 29
                Components
              • 26
                Easy to test
              • 25
                Easy to learn
              • 24
                Easy to templates
              • 23
                Great documentation
              • 21
                Easy to start
              • 19
                Awesome
              • 18
                Light weight
              • 15
                Angular 2.0
              • 14
                Efficient
              • 14
                Javascript mvw framework
              • 14
                Great extensions
              • 11
                Easy to prototype with
              • 9
                High performance
              • 9
                Coffeescript
              • 8
                Two-way binding
              • 8
                Lots of community modules
              • 8
                Mvc
              • 7
                Easy to e2e
              • 7
                Clean and keeps code readable
              • 6
                One of the best frameworks
              • 6
                Easy for small applications
              • 5
                Works great with jquery
              • 5
                Fast development
              • 4
                I do not touch DOM
              • 4
                The two-way Data Binding is awesome
              • 3
                Hierarchical Data Structure
              • 3
                Be a developer, not a plumber.
              • 3
                Declarative programming
              • 3
                Typescript
              • 3
                Dart
              • 3
                Community
              • 2
                Fkin awesome
              • 2
                Opinionated in the right areas
              • 2
                Supports api , easy development
              • 2
                Common Place
              • 2
                Very very useful and fast framework for development
              • 2
                Linear learning curve
              • 2
                Great
              • 2
                Amazing community support
              • 2
                Readable code
              • 2
                Programming fun again
              • 2
                The powerful of binding, routing and controlling routes
              • 2
                Scopes
              • 2
                Consistency with backend architecture if using Nest
              • 1
                Fk react, all my homies hate react
              CONS OF ANGULARJS
              • 12
                Complex
              • 3
                Event Listener Overload
              • 3
                Dependency injection
              • 2
                Hard to learn
              • 2
                Learning Curve

              related AngularJS posts

              Simon Reymann
              Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.5M views

              Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

              • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
              • npm as package manager
              • NestJS as Node.js framework
              • TypeScript as programming language
              • ExpressJS as web server
              • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
              • Postman as a tool for API development
              • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
              • JSON Web Token for access token management

              The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

              • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
              • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
              • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
              • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
              See more
              Simon Reymann
              Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 24 upvotes · 5M views

              Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

              • Nuxt.js consisting of Vue CLI, Vue Router, vuex, Webpack and Sass (Bundler for HTML5, CSS 3), Babel (Transpiler for JavaScript),
              • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed Vue.js components
              • Vuetify as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
              • TypeScript as programming language
              • Apollo / GraphQL (incl. GraphiQL) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
              • ESLint, TSLint and Prettier for coding style and code analyzes
              • Jest as testing framework
              • Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icon toolkit
              • NativeScript-Vue for mobile development

              The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

              • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
              • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
              • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
              • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
              • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
              • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
              See more