StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Kruise vs Rancher

Kruise vs Rancher

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Rancher
Rancher
Stacks952
Followers1.5K
Votes644
Kruise
Kruise
Stacks1
Followers7
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.1K
Forks832

Kruise vs Rancher: What are the differences?

1. **Deployment Strategy**: One key difference between Kruise and Rancher is their approach to deployment strategies. Kruise focuses on automated rollout primitives that allow for advanced deployment techniques, while Rancher provides a centralized platform for managing Kubernetes clusters and applications. 2. **Support for Legacy Applications**: When it comes to legacy applications, Kruise offers better support by providing features like intelligent instance selection for updates and user-defined update logic. Rancher, on the other hand, may require more manual intervention and customization for handling legacy applications. 3. **Extensibility**: Kruise is highly extensible and allows users to integrate custom controllers and operators easily, giving more flexibility in managing complex workflows. In contrast, Rancher offers a more standardized approach with its built-in features and may not be as customizable for specific use cases. 4. **Community Ecosystem**: Rancher has a larger community ecosystem with more resources, plugins, and integrations available, making it a more popular choice for users looking for comprehensive support and documentation. Kruise, being relatively newer, may have a smaller community and fewer third-party extensions. 5. **Resource Efficiency**: Kruise is designed for resource efficiency, optimizing memory and CPU usage during updates and deployments, which can result in faster and more streamlined processes compared to Rancher, which may require more resources to manage the same workload efficiently. 6. **Data Management**: Another key difference is in data management capabilities. Kruise has built-in support for data migration and stateful application management, while Rancher may require additional plugins or tools for handling complex data operations effectively.

In Summary, Kruise and Rancher differ in deployment strategies, support for legacy applications, extensibility, community ecosystem, resource efficiency, and data management capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Rancher
Rancher
Kruise
Kruise

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Attempts to fill such gap by offering a set of controllers as the supplement to manage new workloads in Kubernetes.

Manage Hosts, Deploy Containers, Monitor Resources;User Management & Collaboration;Native Docker APIs & Tools;Monitoring and Logging;Connect Containers, Manage Disks, Deploy Load Balancers;Docker App Catalog; Included Kubernetes Distribution;Included Docker Swarm Distribution; Included Mesos Distribution;Infrastructure Management
Advanced StatefulSet: An enhanced version of default StatefulSet with extra functionalities such as inplace-update, sharding by namespace; BroadcastJob: A job that runs pods to completion across all the nodes in the cluster; SidecarSet: A controller that injects sidecar container into the pod spec based on selectors.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
5.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
832
Stacks
952
Stacks
1
Followers
1.5K
Followers
7
Votes
644
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 103
    Easy to use
  • 79
    Open source and totally free
  • 63
    Multi-host docker-compose support
  • 58
    Load balancing and health check included
  • 58
    Simple
Cons
  • 10
    Hosting Rancher can be complicated
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Jenkins
Jenkins
Datadog
Datadog
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Drone.io
Drone.io
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to Rancher, Kruise?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana