StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Marathon vs Rancher

Marathon vs Rancher

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Rancher
Rancher
Stacks952
Followers1.5K
Votes644
Marathon
Marathon
Stacks84
Followers91
Votes5

Marathon vs Rancher: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between Marathon and Rancher

Marathon is an open-source container orchestration platform that provides powerful clustering and scaling capabilities for running containers, whereas Rancher is a complete container management platform that not only includes an orchestrator like Kubernetes or Docker Swarm but also provides additional features such as infrastructure management and security.

**1. Architecture**: Marathon follows a mesos-based architecture, where it acts as a framework that interfaces with Mesos to manage container tasks, while Rancher is a standalone platform that can integrate with multiple orchestrators like Kubernetes and Swarm, giving users more flexibility in choosing their preferred orchestrator.

**2. Scalability**: Marathon is known for its scalability and ability to manage large-scale container deployments efficiently, making it suitable for enterprises with high container workloads. On the other hand, Rancher offers an intuitive user interface and simplified management experience, making it ideal for small to medium-sized businesses that prioritize ease of use.

**3. Extensibility**: Marathon allows users to extend its functionality through plugins and integrations with other tools, enabling customization and integration with existing systems seamlessly. In comparison, Rancher provides a comprehensive ecosystem of add-ons and plugins for enhanced functionality, making it easier to extend the platform's capabilities without extensive development work.

**4. Community Support**: Marathon is supported by a vibrant open-source community that contributes to its development and offers resources for troubleshooting and guidance, while Rancher provides commercial support options for users who require professional assistance with deployment, configuration, and maintenance of the platform.

**5. Resource Management**: Marathon focuses on efficiently managing container resources and scheduling tasks based on available resources, ensuring optimal performance and utilization. In contrast, Rancher emphasizes infrastructure management and resource allocation, enabling users to allocate resources across clusters and environments effectively.

**6. Monitoring and Logging**: Marathon offers basic monitoring and logging capabilities for container tasks, allowing users to track performance metrics and troubleshoot issues effectively. Meanwhile, Rancher provides advanced monitoring and logging features, including real-time visualization of containerized applications and centralized log management for improved visibility and analysis.

In Summary, Marathon is a scalable container orchestration platform with a focus on efficient task management, while Rancher is a comprehensive container management platform with additional features for infrastructure management and extensibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Rancher
Rancher
Marathon
Marathon

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Marathon is an Apache Mesos framework for container orchestration. Marathon provides a REST API for starting, stopping, and scaling applications. Marathon is written in Scala and can run in highly-available mode by running multiple copies. The state of running tasks gets stored in the Mesos state abstraction.

Manage Hosts, Deploy Containers, Monitor Resources;User Management & Collaboration;Native Docker APIs & Tools;Monitoring and Logging;Connect Containers, Manage Disks, Deploy Load Balancers;Docker App Catalog; Included Kubernetes Distribution;Included Docker Swarm Distribution; Included Mesos Distribution;Infrastructure Management
-
Statistics
Stacks
952
Stacks
84
Followers
1.5K
Followers
91
Votes
644
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 103
    Easy to use
  • 79
    Open source and totally free
  • 63
    Multi-host docker-compose support
  • 58
    Load balancing and health check included
  • 58
    Simple
Cons
  • 10
    Hosting Rancher can be complicated
Pros
  • 1
    Powerful UI
  • 1
    High Availability
  • 1
    Health Checks
  • 1
    Load Balancing
  • 1
    Service Discovery
Integrations
Jenkins
Jenkins
Datadog
Datadog
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Drone.io
Drone.io
Mesosphere
Mesosphere
Apache Mesos
Apache Mesos
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Rancher, Marathon?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana