StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Moby vs Tutum

Moby vs Tutum

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Tutum
Tutum
Stacks61
Followers74
Votes235
Moby
Moby
Stacks38
Followers57
Votes0
GitHub Stars71.0K
Forks18.8K

Moby vs Tutum: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Moby and Tutum

Introduction: Moby and Tutum are both popular tools in the container management ecosystem, but they have several key differences that set them apart.

1. **Architecture**: Moby is a customizable framework for building container systems, while Tutum is a cloud-based platform that simplifies the deployment and management of containerized applications. Moby allows users to tailor their container environment to their specific needs, whereas Tutum provides a more structured approach with pre-built features.

2. **Community Support**: Moby is an open-source project with a large community of contributors and users, making it easier to find support, documentation, and resources. In contrast, Tutum is a commercial product owned by Docker, which may offer more proprietary features but potentially limited community support compared to Moby.

3. **Scalability**: Moby is designed to scale from a single node to a large cluster, allowing for flexible deployment options across different environments. Tutum, on the other hand, is built for managing containers in a cloud-based environment, which may limit its scalability compared to Moby in certain scenarios.

4. **Cost**: Moby is free to use and deploy, making it a more budget-friendly option for organizations looking to build and customize their container infrastructure. Meanwhile, Tutum comes with a pricing structure based on usage and features, which may be a factor for organizations with limited budgets or specific requirements.

5. **Integration**: Moby provides a more modular approach to integrating third-party tools and services into the container ecosystem, allowing for greater customization and flexibility. In comparison, Tutum offers a more integrated solution with pre-built integrations that may simplify the deployment process but limit customization options.

6. **Workflow Automation**: Moby focuses on providing the tools and framework for building container systems, while Tutum emphasizes workflow automation and orchestration capabilities to streamline the deployment and management of containerized applications. This difference in focus can lead to varying levels of complexity and control in the container management process.

In Summary, Moby and Tutum differ in architecture, community support, scalability, cost, integration options, and workflow automation approaches within the container management ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Tutum
Tutum
Moby
Moby

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Moby is a project which provides a “Lego set” of dozens of components, the framework for assembling them into custom container-based systems, and a place for all container enthusiasts to experiment and exchange ideas. Docker the product will be assembled from components that are packaged by the Moby project.

Deploy from Docker Hub; Free private Docker registry; CLI Tool; Private Links; Dynamic Links; RESTful API; Edit & Redeploy; Jumpstarts & Quickstarts; Webhooks; Bring your own node; Data volumes; Amazon Web Services; Digital Ocean; Microsoft Azure;
Orchestration; Image Management; Secret Management; Configuration Management; Networking; Provisioning
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
71.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
18.8K
Stacks
61
Stacks
38
Followers
74
Followers
57
Votes
235
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 35
    Awesome user interface
  • 28
    Free private docker registry
  • 24
    Its super easy
  • 24
    Docker public index integration
  • 21
    Friendly support
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker
Docker
MongoDB
MongoDB
MariaDB
MariaDB
MySQL
MySQL
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Memcached
Memcached
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Riak
Riak
WordPress
WordPress
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Tutum, Moby?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana