StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. Monitorix vs Nagios

Monitorix vs Nagios

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Nagios
Nagios
Stacks811
Followers1.1K
Votes102
GitHub Stars57
Forks38
Monitorix
Monitorix
Stacks5
Followers15
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.2K
Forks172

Monitorix vs Nagios: What are the differences?

Introduction

When it comes to monitoring tools for servers and networks, Monitorix and Nagios are two popular options. While both tools offer monitoring capabilities, they have key differences that set them apart in terms of features and functionality.

1. Scalability:

Monitorix is designed for small to medium-sized environments with a focus on simplicity and ease of use. On the other hand, Nagios is known for its scalability and is often used in large enterprise environments with complex infrastructures.

2. Alerting and Notifications:

Nagios provides more advanced alerting and notification features compared to Monitorix. Nagios allows users to set up customized alerts based on specific conditions and send notifications via various channels such as email, SMS, or mobile apps.

3. Plugin Ecosystem:

Nagios has a vast plugin ecosystem with thousands of community-contributed plugins for monitoring various services, applications, and devices. Monitorix, on the other hand, has a limited number of built-in plugins for monitoring system resources.

4. Graphical Representation:

Monitorix offers graphical representations of system data in a user-friendly web interface, making it easier for users to visualize performance metrics. Nagios, while it does offer some graphical capabilities, is more focused on providing detailed textual output for monitoring purposes.

5. Resource Usage:

Monitorix is known for its lightweight footprint and low resource usage, making it suitable for resource-constrained environments. Nagios, on the other hand, can be more resource-intensive, especially in large-scale deployments with a high number of monitored hosts and services.

6. Configuration Complexity:

Nagios has a steeper learning curve and can be more complex to configure compared to Monitorix. Monitorix, with its simpler configuration options and intuitive interface, is often preferred by users looking for a quick and easy monitoring solution.

In Summary, Monitorix and Nagios differ in terms of scalability, alerting capabilities, plugin ecosystem, graphical representation, resource usage, and configuration complexity.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Nagios, Monitorix

Matthias
Matthias

Teamlead IT at NanoTemper Technologies

Jun 11, 2020

Decided
  • free open source
  • modern interface and architecture
  • large community
  • extendable I knew Nagios for decades but it was really outdated (by its architecture) at some point. That's why Icinga started first as a fork, not with Icinga2 it is completely built from scratch but backward-compatible with Nagios plugins. Now it has reached a state with which I am confident.
142k views142k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Nagios
Nagios
Monitorix
Monitorix

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

It has been created to be used under production Linux/UNIX servers, but due to its simplicity and small size can be used on embedded devices as well.

Monitor your entire IT infrastructure;Spot problems before they occur;Know immediately when problems arise;Share availability data with stakeholders;Detect security breaches;Plan and budget for IT upgrades;Reduce downtime and business losses
System load average and usage; Global kernel usage; Per-processor kernel usage; Generic sensors statistics; IPMI sensor statistics; NVIDIA temperatures and usage
Statistics
GitHub Stars
57
GitHub Stars
1.2K
GitHub Forks
38
GitHub Forks
172
Stacks
811
Stacks
5
Followers
1.1K
Followers
15
Votes
102
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 53
    It just works
  • 28
    The standard
  • 12
    Customizable
  • 8
    The Most flexible monitoring system
  • 1
    Huge stack of free checks/plugins to choose from
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Linux
Linux
Datadog
Datadog
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
VictorOps
VictorOps
Server Density
Server Density
Alerta
Alerta
Bigpanda
Bigpanda

What are some alternatives to Nagios, Monitorix?

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Netdata

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana