StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. NetData vs Prometheus

NetData vs Prometheus

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Prometheus
Prometheus
Stacks4.8K
Followers3.8K
Votes239
GitHub Stars61.1K
Forks9.9K
Netdata
Netdata
Stacks226
Followers392
Votes82

NetData vs Prometheus: What are the differences?

NetData and Prometheus are two popular monitoring tools that provide insights into the performance and health of systems, applications, and networks. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Data Collection Method: NetData uses a streaming-based approach to collect data in real-time, continuously polling system metrics at high frequencies. On the other hand, Prometheus follows a pull-based model, where it regularly scrapes metrics from endpoint targets. This fundamental difference in data collection methods can affect the accuracy and responsiveness of the monitoring data.

  2. Architecture: NetData has an agent-based architecture, which means that individual agents need to be installed and configured on each target machine. In contrast, Prometheus operates as a standalone server that collects metrics from various exporters and targets through HTTP or other protocols. This architectural difference can impact the deployment and scalability of the monitoring setup.

  3. Alerting and Notification: NetData supports basic alerting capabilities but relies on external tools like email or SMS gateways for notifications. Prometheus, on the other hand, provides a built-in alerting system that can trigger notifications based on user-defined rules and thresholds. This native alerting feature makes Prometheus more self-contained and convenient for managing alerts.

  4. Data Storage: NetData stores metrics in memory by default, allowing for real-time visualization and analysis. However, for long-term storage or historical analysis, NetData relies on third-party tools like Elasticsearch or InfluxDB. In contrast, Prometheus has its own time-series database that stores metrics persistently, making it easier to perform time-based queries and generate historical reports.

  5. Service Discovery: NetData does not have built-in service discovery mechanisms and relies on manual configuration of targets. On the other hand, Prometheus has robust service discovery capabilities that automatically identify and monitor new instances as they come online or go offline. This automatic service discovery simplifies the management of dynamic environments and facilitates scaling.

  6. Ecosystem and Integrations: Prometheus has a vibrant ecosystem with a wide range of integrations, exporters, and community-contributed plugins, making it easy to collect metrics from different systems and applications. NetData, while extensible through various collectors and plugins, has a less extensive ecosystem and may require more custom development for integrating with specific technologies.

In summary, NetData provides real-time, per-second monitoring with a user-friendly interface, making it easy to visualize system metrics and troubleshoot issues quickly. In contrast, Prometheus offers powerful querying and alerting capabilities, along with a robust ecosystem of exporters and integrations, making it suitable for large-scale, multi-dimensional monitoring setups.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Prometheus, Netdata

Leonardo Henrique da
Leonardo Henrique da

Pleno QA Enginneer at SolarMarket

Dec 8, 2020

Decided

The objective of this work was to develop a system to monitor the materials of a production line using IoT technology. Currently, the process of monitoring and replacing parts depends on manual services. For this, load cells, microcontroller, Broker MQTT, Telegraf, InfluxDB, and Grafana were used. It was implemented in a workflow that had the function of collecting sensor data, storing it in a database, and visualizing it in the form of weight and quantity. With these developed solutions, he hopes to contribute to the logistics area, in the replacement and control of materials.

402k views402k
Comments
Raja Subramaniam
Raja Subramaniam

Aug 27, 2019

Needs adviceonPrometheusPrometheusKubernetesKubernetesSysdigSysdig

We have Prometheus as a monitoring engine as a part of our stack which contains Kubernetes cluster, container images and other open source tools. Also, I am aware that Sysdig can be integrated with Prometheus but I really wanted to know whether Sysdig or sysdig+prometheus will make better monitoring solution.

779k views779k
Comments
Susmita
Susmita

Senior SRE at African Bank

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceonGrafanaGrafana

Looking for a tool which can be used for mainly dashboard purposes, but here are the main requirements:

  • Must be able to get custom data from AS400,
  • Able to display automation test results,
  • System monitoring / Nginx API,
  • Able to get data from 3rd parties DB.

Grafana is almost solving all the problems, except AS400 and no database to get automation test results.

869k views869k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Prometheus
Prometheus
Netdata
Netdata

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Dimensional data; Powerful queries; Great visualization; Efficient storage; Precise alerting; Simple operation
Free, open-source; Easy installation and configuration; Access to monitoring unlimited metrics; Prebuilt dashboards and alarms; alerts on any metric, for a single host, an entire cluster, or your entire infrastructure; Tools for team collaboration; 800+ integrations
Statistics
GitHub Stars
61.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
4.8K
Stacks
226
Followers
3.8K
Followers
392
Votes
239
Votes
82
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 47
    Powerful easy to use monitoring
  • 38
    Flexible query language
  • 32
    Dimensional data model
  • 27
    Alerts
  • 23
    Active and responsive community
Cons
  • 12
    Just for metrics
  • 6
    Bad UI
  • 6
    Needs monitoring to access metrics endpoints
  • 4
    Not easy to configure and use
  • 3
    Supports only active agents
Pros
  • 17
    Free
  • 14
    Easy setup
  • 12
    Graphs are interactive
  • 9
    Well maintained on github
  • 9
    Montiors datasbases
Integrations
Grafana
Grafana
Puppet Labs
Puppet Labs
CouchDB
CouchDB
ActiveMQ
ActiveMQ
Logstash
Logstash
Fail2ban
Fail2ban
TimescaleDB
TimescaleDB
Windows
Windows
Grafana
Grafana
MongoDB
MongoDB
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ

What are some alternatives to Prometheus, Netdata?

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Zabbix

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Telegraf

Telegraf

It is an agent for collecting, processing, aggregating, and writing metrics. Design goals are to have a minimal memory footprint with a plugin system so that developers in the community can easily add support for collecting metrics.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana