Alternatives to Nuxt.js logo

Alternatives to Nuxt.js

Meteor, Next.js, Gridsome, PHP, and Bootstrap are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Nuxt.js.
1K
909
+ 1
215

What is Nuxt.js and what are its top alternatives?

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.
Nuxt.js is a tool in the Front-End Frameworks category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Nuxt.js

  • Meteor

    Meteor

    A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets. ...

  • Next.js

    Next.js

    Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

  • Gridsome

    Gridsome

    Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again. ...

  • PHP

    PHP

    Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world. ...

  • Bootstrap

    Bootstrap

    Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web. ...

  • Animate.css

    Animate.css

    It is a bunch of cool, fun, and cross-browser animations for you to use in your projects. Great for emphasis, home pages, sliders, and general just-add-water-awesomeness. ...

  • Material Design for Angular

    Material Design for Angular

    Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs. ...

  • Foundation

    Foundation

    Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices. ...

Nuxt.js alternatives & related posts

Meteor logo

Meteor

1.7K
1.6K
1.7K
An ultra-simple, database-everywhere, data-on-the-wire, pure-Javascript web framework
1.7K
1.6K
+ 1
1.7K
PROS OF METEOR
  • 249
    Real-time
  • 197
    Full stack, one language
  • 181
    Best app dev platform available today
  • 152
    Data synchronization
  • 151
    Javascript
  • 117
    Focus on your product not the plumbing
  • 106
    Open source
  • 105
    Hot code pushes
  • 100
    Live page updates
  • 92
    Latency compensation
  • 38
    Ultra-simple development environment
  • 29
    Smart Packages
  • 28
    Real time awesome
  • 23
    Great for beginners
  • 22
    Direct Cordova integration
  • 16
    Better than Rails
  • 15
    Less moving parts
  • 13
    It's just amazing
  • 10
    Blaze
  • 8
    Plugins for everything
  • 8
    Great community support
  • 6
    One command spits out android and ios ready apps.
  • 5
    It just works
  • 5
    0 to Production in no time
  • 4
    Coding Speed
  • 4
    Is Agile in development hybrid(mobile/web)
  • 4
    You can grok it in a day. No ng nonsense
  • 4
    Easy deployment
  • 2
    One Code => 3 Platforms: Web, Android and IOS
  • 2
    Easy yet powerful
  • 2
    AngularJS Integration
  • 1
    Friendly to use
  • 1
    Stack available on Codeanywhere
  • 1
    Real time
  • 1
    High quality, very few bugs
  • 1
    Easy Setup
  • 1
    Free
  • 1
    Nosql
  • 1
    Hookie friendly
  • 1
    Community
CONS OF METEOR
  • 3
    Hard to debug issues on the server-side
  • 3
    Heavily CPU bound
  • 3
    Does not scale well

related Meteor posts

Lucas Litton
Director of Strategy at DigitalSignal | 13 upvotes 路 125.6K views

Next.js is probably the most enjoyable React framework our team could have picked. The development is an extremely smooth process, the file structure is beautiful and organized, and the speed is no joke. Our work with Next.js comes out much faster than if it was built on pure React or frameworks alike. We were previously developing all of our projects in Meteor before making the switch. We left Meteor due to the slow compiler and website speed. We deploy all of our Next.js projects on Vercel.

See more
Shared insights
on
MeteorMeteorNode.jsNode.js
at

Mixmax was originally built using Meteor as a single monolithic app. As more users began to onboard, we started noticing scaling issues, and so we broke out our first microservice: our Compose service, for writing emails and Sequences, was born as a Node.js service. Soon after that, we broke out all recipient searching and storage functionality to another Node.js microservice, our Contacts service. This practice of breaking out microservices in order to help our system more appropriately scale, by being more explicit about each microservice鈥檚 responsibilities, continued as we broke out numerous more microservices.

See more
Next.js logo

Next.js

1.8K
1.8K
157
A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps
1.8K
1.8K
+ 1
157
PROS OF NEXT.JS
  • 26
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 20
    Built with React
  • 18
    Easy setup
  • 16
    Zero setup
  • 15
    Universal JavaScript
  • 11
    TypeScript
  • 7
    Static site generator
  • 6
    Simple deployment
  • 6
    Frictionless development
  • 5
    Just JavaScript
  • 5
    Incremental static regeneration
  • 5
    Filesystem as an API
  • 4
    Testing
  • 4
    Everything is a function
  • 4
    Isomorphic React applications
  • 3
    Well Documented
  • 2
    Has many examples and integrations
CONS OF NEXT.JS
  • 2
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)

related Next.js posts

I'm working as one of the engineering leads in RunaHR. As our platform is a Saas, we thought It'd be good to have an API (We chose Ruby and Rails for this) and a SPA (built with React and Redux ) connected. We started the SPA with Create React App since It's pretty easy to start.

We use Jest as the testing framework and react-testing-library to test React components. In Rails we make tests using RSpec.

Our main database is PostgreSQL, but we also use MongoDB to store some type of data. We started to use Redis 聽for cache and other time sensitive operations.

We have a couple of extra projects: One is an Employee app built with React Native and the other is an internal back office dashboard built with Next.js for the client and Python in the backend side.

Since we have different frontend apps we have found useful to have Bit to document visual components and utils in JavaScript.

See more
Robert Zuber

We are in the process of adopting Next.js as our React framework and using Storybook to help build our React components in isolation. This new part of our frontend is written in TypeScript, and we use Emotion for CSS/styling. For delivering data, we use GraphQL and Apollo. Jest, Percy, and Cypress are used for testing.

See more
Gridsome logo

Gridsome

120
242
49
Build blazing fast websites for any CMS or data with Vue.js & GraphQL 鈿★笍馃挌
120
242
+ 1
49
PROS OF GRIDSOME
  • 14
    Vuejs
  • 10
    GraphQL
  • 6
    Starter kit as a base for new project
  • 5
    Reusable components (Vue)
  • 4
    Open source
  • 3
    Allows to use markdown files as articles
  • 3
    Static-sites
  • 2
    Generated websites are super fast
  • 2
    Blogging website
  • 0
    Webpack
CONS OF GRIDSOME
  • 1
    Still young
  • 1
    Open source

related Gridsome posts

PHP logo

PHP

98.1K
43.4K
4.5K
A popular general-purpose scripting language that is especially suited to web development
98.1K
43.4K
+ 1
4.5K
PROS OF PHP
  • 938
    Large community
  • 800
    Open source
  • 754
    Easy deployment
  • 480
    Great frameworks
  • 384
    The best glue on the web
  • 230
    Continual improvements
  • 180
    Good old web
  • 141
    Web foundation
  • 130
    Community packages
  • 123
    Tool support
  • 31
    Used by wordpress
  • 30
    Excellent documentation
  • 25
    Used by Facebook
  • 23
    Because of Symfony
  • 16
    Dynamic Language
  • 14
    Awesome Language and easy to implement
  • 12
    Fast development
  • 11
    Cheap hosting
  • 11
    Very powerful web language
  • 9
    Flexibility, syntax, extensibility
  • 9
    Composer
  • 9
    Because of Laravel
  • 7
    Easy to learn
  • 7
    Short development lead times
  • 7
    Worst popularity quality ratio
  • 7
    Fastestest Time to Version 1.0 Deployments
  • 7
    Readable Code
  • 6
    Easiest deployment
  • 6
    Fast
  • 6
    Faster then ever
  • 5
    Most of the web uses it
  • 4
    Open source and large community
  • 4
    I have no choice :(
  • 3
    Easy to learn, a big community, lot of frameworks
  • 3
    Is like one zip of air
  • 3
    Has the best ecommerce(Magento,Prestashop,Opencart,etc)
  • 3
    Cheap to own
  • 3
    Simple, flexible yet Scalable
  • 3
    Easy to use and learn
  • 2
    Hard not to use
  • 2
    Large community, easy setup, easy deployment, framework
  • 2
    Safe the planet
  • 2
    Walk away
  • 2
    Great flexibility. From fast prototyping to large apps
  • 2
    Used by STOMT
  • 2
    Great developer experience
  • 2
    Open source and great framework
  • 2
    Fault tolerance
  • 2
    FFI
  • 2
    Interpreted at the run time
CONS OF PHP
  • 19
    So easy to learn, good practices are hard to find
  • 16
    Inconsistent API
  • 8
    Fragmented community
  • 5
    Not secure
  • 2
    No routing system
  • 1
    Hard to debug
  • 1
    Old

related PHP posts

Nick Rockwell
SVP, Engineering at Fastly | 42 upvotes 路 1.4M views

When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?

So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.

React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.

Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.

See more
Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH | 23 upvotes 路 1.5M views

Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

  • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
  • npm as package manager
  • NestJS as Node.js framework
  • TypeScript as programming language
  • ExpressJS as web server
  • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API鈥檚 resources
  • Postman as a tool for API development
  • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
  • JSON Web Token for access token management

The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

  • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
  • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
  • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
  • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
See more
Bootstrap logo

Bootstrap

51.9K
11K
7.6K
Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions
51.9K
11K
+ 1
7.6K
PROS OF BOOTSTRAP
  • 1.6K
    Responsiveness
  • 1.2K
    UI components
  • 945
    Consistent
  • 776
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
  • 466
    HTML, CSS, and JS framework
  • 410
    Open source
  • 375
    Widely used
  • 368
    Customizable
  • 241
    HTML framework
  • 76
    Popular
  • 75
    Easy setup
  • 75
    Mobile first
  • 56
    Great grid system
  • 49
    Great community
  • 38
    Future compatibility
  • 34
    Integration
  • 27
    Very powerful foundational front-end framework
  • 24
    Standard
  • 23
    Javascript plugins
  • 19
    Build faster prototypes
  • 18
    Preprocessors
  • 13
    Grids
  • 8
    Clean
  • 7
    Good for a person who hates CSS
  • 4
    Easy to setup and learn
  • 4
    Rapid development
  • 4
    Love it
  • 2
    Popularity
  • 2
    Community
  • 2
    Great and easy to make a responsive website
  • 2
    Sprzedam opla
  • 2
    Powerful grid system, Rapid development, Customization
  • 2
    Clean and quick frontend development
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Great customer support
  • 1
    The fame
  • 1
    Easy setup2
  • 1
    Painless front end development
  • 1
    So clean and simple
  • 1
    Numerous components
  • 1
    Material-ui
  • 1
    Geo
  • 1
    Boostrap
  • 1
    Pre-Defined components
  • 1
    Great and easy
  • 1
    It's fast
  • 1
    Reactjs
  • 1
    Great and easy to use
  • 1
    Responsive design
  • 1
    Design Agnostic
  • 1
    Provide angular wrapper
  • 1
    Recognizable
  • 1
    Intuitive
  • 1
    Love the classes?
  • 1
    Felxible, comfortable, user-friendly
  • 0
    Frefsd
CONS OF BOOTSTRAP
  • 23
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 14
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 11
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 11
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 7
    Verbose styles

related Bootstrap posts

Hello, I hope everyone is doing good and safe. I need advice on what to learn more, I have started learning HTML, CSS, Bootstrap, JavaScript, Node.js, ExpressJS, React. eventually will learn MongoDB too. I would like to be a Front End developer or full-stack developer. What else would be the suggestion to get a job and what things I need to focus more on as a fresher to make my skills better. Do I have to be good in Algorithms and Dynamic Programming to find a job for entry-level? Looking forward to hearing from you guys for suggestions.聽

See more
Ganesa Vijayakumar
Full Stack Coder | Module Lead | 18 upvotes 路 2M views

I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

Thanks, Ganesa

See more
Animate.css  logo

Animate.css

8.7K
973
0
A library of CSS animations
8.7K
973
+ 1
0
PROS OF ANIMATE.CSS
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF ANIMATE.CSS
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Animate.css posts

      Material Design for Angular logo

      Material Design for Angular

      7.2K
      5.5K
      514
      Material Design for AngularJS Apps
      7.2K
      5.5K
      + 1
      514
      PROS OF MATERIAL DESIGN FOR ANGULAR
      • 114
        Ui components
      • 62
        Backed by google
      • 51
        Free
      • 50
        Backed by angular
      • 48
        Javascript
      • 34
        Open source
      • 32
        Responsiveness
      • 31
        Easy to learn
      • 28
        Quick to develop
      • 20
        Customizable
      • 8
        Easy to start
      • 8
        Powerful
      • 6
        Flexible
      • 6
        Themes
      • 4
        Flexbox Layouts
      • 3
        I like its design
      • 3
        Great community
      • 2
        Great extensions
      • 1
        CDK
      • 1
        It's the best looking out of the box
      • 1
        Seamless integration with AngularJS but lack of docs
      • 1
        Consistents
      • 0
        Progressive Web Apps - to learn
      CONS OF MATERIAL DESIGN FOR ANGULAR
      • 3
        No practical examples

      related Material Design for Angular posts

      Foundation logo

      Foundation

      1.2K
      1K
      735
      The most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world
      1.2K
      1K
      + 1
      735
      PROS OF FOUNDATION
      • 158
        Responsive grid
      • 92
        Mobile first
      • 79
        Open source
      • 75
        Semantic
      • 72
        Customizable
      • 51
        Quick to prototype
      • 50
        Simple ui
      • 45
        Fast
      • 44
        Best practices
      • 39
        Easy setup
      • 6
        Neutral style
      • 6
        HTML, SCSS and JS
      • 5
        Professional
      • 5
        Accessibility support
      • 3
        Xy grid
      • 2
        Every new version is smaller, smarter & more efficient
      • 2
        Sass
      • 1
        Robust
      CONS OF FOUNDATION
      • 4
        Requires jQuery
      • 4
        Awful site

      related Foundation posts

      ReactQL is a React + GraphQL front-end starter kit. #JSX is a natural way to think about building UI, and it renders to pure #HTML in the browser and on the server, making it trivial to build server-rendered Single Page Apps. GraphQL via Apollo was chosen for the data layer; #GraphQL makes it simple to request just the data your app needs, and #Apollo takes care of communicating with your API (written in any language; doesn't have to be JavaScript!), caching, and rendering to #React.

      ReactQL is written in TypeScript to provide full types/Intellisense, and pick up hard-to-diagnose goofs that might later show up at runtime. React makes heavy use of Webpack 4 to handle transforming your code to an optimised client-side bundle, and in throws back just enough code needed for the initial render, while seamlessly handling import statements asynchronously as needed, making the payload your user downloads ultimately much smaller than trying to do it by hand.

      React Helmet was chosen to handle <head> content, because it works universally, making it easy to throw back the correct <title> and other tags on the initial render, as well as inject new tags for subsequent client-side views.

      styled-components, Sass, Less and PostCSS were added to give developers a choice of whether to build styles purely in React / JavaScript, or whether to defer to a #css #preprocessor. This is especially useful for interop with UI frameworks like Bootstrap, Semantic UI, Foundation, etc - ReactQL lets you mix and match #css and renders to both a static .css file during bundling as well as generates per-page <style> tags when using #StyledComponents.

      React Router handles routing, because it works both on the server and in the client. ReactQL customises it further by capturing non-200 responses on the server, redirecting or throwing back custom 404 pages as needed.

      Koa is the web server that handles all incoming HTTP requests, because it's fast (TTFB < 5ms, even after fully rendering React), and its natively #async, making it easy to async/await inside routes and middleware.

      See more