StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Next.js vs Nuxt

Next.js vs Nuxt

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K
Nuxt.js
Nuxt.js
Stacks2.0K
Followers1.7K
Votes372

Next.js vs Nuxt: What are the differences?

Next.js and Nuxt are both popular frameworks used for building server-side rendered (SSR) applications with JavaScript. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Routing Approach: Next.js uses a file-based routing system, where each page is represented by a separate file in the pages directory. On the other hand, Nuxt uses a folder-based routing system, where each page is represented by a folder that contains an index.vue file. This allows for more flexibility in organizing the application structure in Nuxt.

  2. Built-in Features: Next.js, being built on top of React, provides features like automatic code splitting, server-side rendering, and static site generation out of the box. Nuxt, on the other hand, is built on top of Vue.js and provides features like automatic code splitting, server-side rendering, and static site generation as well. However, Nuxt also includes additional features like Vuex store integration, Vue Router integration, and module-based architecture.

  3. Pages Organization: The way pages are organized in the two frameworks is another difference. In Next.js, each page component is placed in the pages directory and can be accessed directly through its file name. In Nuxt, each page is placed in a dedicated directory within the pages directory and must be accessed through its directory name and the route parameters as well. This allows for more granular control over page-specific files and configurations in Nuxt.

  4. Development Environment: Next.js and Nuxt have different approaches to the development environment. Next.js provides a built-in development server that hot-reloads the application and updates the changes instantly. It also supports custom server logic for more advanced use cases. Nuxt, on the other hand, provides a development server with similar capabilities but also includes a built-in middleware system that allows developers to add custom logic to the server and modify the request/response cycle.

  5. Configuration Options: Another difference lies in the configuration options of Next.js and Nuxt. Next.js follows a convention-over-configuration approach, where many configuration options are predefined and require less configuration. Nuxt, on the other hand, provides more configuration options and allows for more customization. This can be seen in the nuxt.config.js file, where various settings can be adjusted to suit the application's needs.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Next.js and Nuxt have vibrant communities and ecosystems, but they differ in terms of the libraries, plugins, and themes available. Next.js has a larger community and a wider range of libraries and plugins built specifically for React. Nuxt, being based on Vue, also has a strong community with many Vue-specific libraries and plugins available. The choice between the two frameworks may depend on the existing ecosystem and community support for the preferred JavaScript framework.

In summary, while Next.js is primarily focused on React, offering features like automatic code splitting, server-side rendering, and static site generation, Nuxt.js is tailored for Vue.js, providing similar features such as server-side rendering, static site generation, and module-based architecture.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Next.js, Nuxt.js

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Next.js
Next.js
Nuxt.js
Nuxt.js

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Automatic transpilation and bundling; Hot module replacement; Server-side rendering OR Single Page App OR Static Generated, you choose 🔥; Static file serving; Configurable with a nuxt.config.js file; Custom layouts with the layouts/ directory; Middleware; Code splitting for every pages
Statistics
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
29.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
8.0K
Stacks
2.0K
Followers
5.1K
Followers
1.7K
Votes
330
Votes
372
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Pros
  • 62
    SSR
  • 47
    Automatic routes
  • 33
    Middleware
  • 29
    Hot code reloading
  • 22
    SPA
Integrations
React
React
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Next.js, Nuxt.js?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase