StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. PHPStan vs Psalm

PHPStan vs Psalm

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PHPStan
PHPStan
Stacks418
Followers99
Votes0
GitHub Stars13.7K
Forks933
Psalm
Psalm
Stacks22
Followers25
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.8K
Forks681

PHPStan vs Psalm: What are the differences?

PHPStan and Psalm are both static analysis tools for PHP code. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Type Inference: One of the key differences between PHPStan and Psalm is their approach to type inference. PHPStan uses a strict type inference algorithm that can handle complex type systems and infer types even in the presence of dynamic behavior. On the other hand, Psalm uses a more conservative approach to type inference, focusing on strict typing and leveraging PHPDoc annotations to infer types.

  2. Error Reporting: When it comes to error reporting, PHPStan provides a more detailed and comprehensive report compared to Psalm. PHPStan's error messages are quite verbose and provide useful information about the type issues, potential bugs, and even suggestions to fix them. Psalm, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and provides more concise error messages, making it easier to understand and fix the reported issues quickly.

  3. Level of strictness: PHPStan offers various levels of strictness that can be set depending on the project's requirements. It provides a fine-grained control over the level of strictness and allows developers to decide how strict they want the analysis to be. Psalm, on the other hand, is more opinionated and enforces a high level of strictness by default. While this can be beneficial for maintaining code quality, it may require more effort to fix all the reported issues.

  4. Plugin Ecosystem: PHPStan has a vast plugin ecosystem that allows developers to extend its functionality further. It provides a wide range of community-supported plugins for different frameworks, libraries, and tooling integrations, making it highly customizable and adaptable. On the other hand, Psalm has a smaller plugin ecosystem and is more focused on providing a unified and consistent analysis experience out of the box.

  5. Developer Community: Both PHPStan and Psalm have active developer communities, but they differ in terms of size and focus. PHPStan has a larger community with a broader range of contributors, which often results in more frequent updates and faster bug fixes. Psalm, on the other hand, has a smaller but dedicated community that focuses on rigorous testing and stability, ensuring a reliable analysis experience.

  6. Documentation and Learning Resources: PHPStan has extensive documentation and a wide range of learning resources available, including tutorials, articles, and video tutorials. This extensive documentation makes it easier for developers to learn and get started with PHPStan. While Psalm also has documentation and learning resources available, they may not be as extensive as PHPStan.

In summary, while PHPStan focuses on providing strict type checking and static analysis to identify potential bugs and issues in PHP code, Psalm offers additional features such as Psalm plugins and advanced inference capabilities, making it a comprehensive solution for improving PHP code quality and maintainability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PHPStan
PHPStan
Psalm
Psalm

It focuses on finding errors in your code without actually running it. It catches whole classes of bugs even before you write tests for the code. It moves PHP closer to compiled languages in the sense that the correctness of each line of the code can be checked before you run the actual line.

It is a type-checking static analysis tool for PHP that finds bugs humans can miss, and improves code quality. It is designed to be useful on both large legacy codebases and small, modern ones. It can help you prevent the vast majority of type-related runtime errors, and also enables you to take advantage of safe coding patterns popular in other languages.

Static Analysis Tool ;Focuses on finding errors in your code without actually running it;Extensible;
Open-source; Static analysis tool; Identify both obvious and hard-to-spot bugs in your code; Can automatically fix a number of the errors it finds
Statistics
GitHub Stars
13.7K
GitHub Stars
5.8K
GitHub Forks
933
GitHub Forks
681
Stacks
418
Stacks
22
Followers
99
Followers
25
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Drupal
Drupal
WordPress
WordPress
Laravel
Laravel
PHP
PHP
Symfony
Symfony
Yii
Yii
Nette Framework
Nette Framework
Typo3
Typo3
Zend Framework
Zend Framework
Doctrine 2
Doctrine 2
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to PHPStan, Psalm?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana