StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. PHPStan vs SonarLint

PHPStan vs SonarLint

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PHPStan
PHPStan
Stacks418
Followers99
Votes0
GitHub Stars13.7K
Forks933
SonarLint
SonarLint
Stacks175
Followers352
Votes16

PHPStan vs SonarLint: What are the differences?

Introduction

This article provides a comparison between PHPStan and SonarLint in terms of their key differences. PHPStan and SonarLint are popular code analysis tools used by developers to detect and fix issues in their code.

  1. Interoperability: PHPStan is specifically designed for PHP code analysis and provides a comprehensive set of rules and checks tailored for PHP development. On the other hand, SonarLint is a more generic code analysis tool that supports multiple programming languages, including PHP. This difference in focus makes PHPStan more specialized and optimized for PHP development.

  2. Integration: PHPStan can be easily integrated into PHP projects using Composer, allowing developers to incorporate it seamlessly into their development workflow. SonarLint, on the other hand, requires integration with a SonarQube server for full functionality. This additional layer of integration can be a barrier for some developers who prefer a more lightweight and standalone solution like PHPStan.

  3. Rule Set and Configuration: PHPStan provides a predefined set of rules and configurations that cover a wide range of potential issues in PHP code. However, it also allows developers to customize the rule set and add their own rules as per their project's specific requirements. SonarLint, on the other hand, provides a fixed set of rules that cannot be modified, restricting the flexibility for customization.

  4. Real-time Analysis: PHPStan performs static code analysis and provides instant feedback on potential issues as developers write their code. This real-time analysis helps developers catch errors early in the development process, resulting in faster debugging and higher code quality. SonarLint, on the other hand, requires a code analysis to be triggered explicitly, which can lead to delayed detection of issues and slower development feedback loops.

  5. Community Support: PHPStan has a vibrant community of PHP developers who actively contribute to its development, provide support, and share best practices. This strong community support ensures regular updates, bug fixes, and enhancements to PHPStan. SonarLint also has a supportive community, but it is more spread across different programming languages, making PHP-specific support relatively less prominent.

  6. IDE Integration: PHPStan offers excellent integration with popular PHP Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) such as PhpStorm or Visual Studio Code. This integration includes features like in-editor code highlighting, autocompletion, and quick fixes based on PHPStan's analysis. SonarLint, while also offering some IDE integrations, might not provide the same level of seamless integration with PHP-specific tools and functions.

In Summary, PHPStan is a specialized and PHP-centric code analysis tool with seamless integration, real-time analysis, and a strong PHP community support, while SonarLint is a more generic code analysis tool with a wider language support and requirement for SonarQube integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PHPStan
PHPStan
SonarLint
SonarLint

It focuses on finding errors in your code without actually running it. It catches whole classes of bugs even before you write tests for the code. It moves PHP closer to compiled languages in the sense that the correctness of each line of the code can be checked before you run the actual line.

It is an IDE extension that helps you detect and fix quality issues as you write code. Like a spell checker, it squiggles flaws so that they can be fixed before committing code.

Static Analysis Tool ;Focuses on finding errors in your code without actually running it;Extensible;
Bug detection;Instant feedback;Know what to do;Learn from your mistakes;Uncover old issues
Statistics
GitHub Stars
13.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
933
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
418
Stacks
175
Followers
99
Followers
352
Votes
0
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 13
    IDE Integration
  • 3
    Free
Cons
  • 3
    Not Very User Friendly
  • 3
    Non contextual warnings
Integrations
Drupal
Drupal
WordPress
WordPress
Laravel
Laravel
PHP
PHP
Symfony
Symfony
Yii
Yii
Nette Framework
Nette Framework
Typo3
Typo3
Zend Framework
Zend Framework
Doctrine 2
Doctrine 2
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Eclipse
Eclipse
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA

What are some alternatives to PHPStan, SonarLint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana