Alternatives to QuickBlox logo

Alternatives to QuickBlox

SendBird, Firebase, PubNub, Twilio, and CometChat are the most popular alternatives and competitors to QuickBlox.
31
106
+ 1
7

What is QuickBlox and what are its top alternatives?

QuickBlox is a cloud communication platform that enables developers to add chat, video calling, and other communication features to their applications. Key features of QuickBlox include real-time chat, video calling, push notifications, data synchronization, user authentication, and file sharing. However, some limitations of QuickBlox include the complexity of its API, limited documentation, and higher pricing compared to other alternatives.

  1. Firebase Realtime Database: Firebase offers a real-time database that can be used for building real-time chat and other communication features in applications. Key features include real-time data synchronization, offline access, and easy integration with Firebase Authentication. Pros include easy setup and integration, while cons include limited querying capabilities and pricing based on data transfer.
  2. Sendbird: Sendbird provides a chat API and messaging SDK for building real-time chat features in applications. Key features include in-app messaging, chat rooms, push notifications, and moderation tools. Pros include robust features and scalability, while cons include pricing based on monthly active users and limited free tier.
  3. Twilio Chat: Twilio offers a chat API for building real-time chat features in applications. Key features include in-app messaging, chat channels, and message archiving. Pros include reliable infrastructure and flexible pricing, while cons include additional costs for features like media messages.
  4. Stream Chat: Stream provides a chat API and SDK for building real-time chat features in applications. Key features include in-app messaging, chat channels, push notifications, and message history. Pros include easy integration and scalability, while cons include pricing based on monthly active users.
  5. PubNub: PubNub offers a real-time messaging platform for connecting devices and applications. Key features include real-time data streams, presence notifications, and message history. Pros include high reliability and global scalability, while cons include pricing based on messages and connections.
  6. Agora: Agora provides SDKs for building real-time communication features such as voice and video calling in applications. Key features include high-quality audio and video, low latency, and cloud recording. Pros include easy integration and cross-platform support, while cons include pricing based on usage.
  7. Pusher Chatkit: Pusher offers a chat API for adding real-time chat features to applications. Key features include group chat, typing indicators, read receipts, and message history. Pros include easy setup and feature-rich SDKs, while cons include pricing based on active users and messages.
  8. MirrorFly: MirrorFly provides a real-time messaging SDK for building chat features in applications. Key features include one-to-one and group chat, file sharing, video calling, and moderation tools. Pros include customizable UI and advanced features, while cons include pricing based on monthly active users.
  9. Ably: Ably offers a real-time data delivery platform for building real-time features in applications. Key features include pub/sub messaging, presence notifications, and message history. Pros include high reliability and low latency, while cons include pricing based on data transfer.
  10. CometChat: CometChat provides a chat SDK for adding real-time chat features to applications. Key features include text, voice, and video chat, push notifications, and moderation tools. Pros include easy integration and extensive documentation, while cons include pricing based on monthly active users.

Top Alternatives to QuickBlox

  • SendBird
    SendBird

    SendBird is a Messaging SDK, Chat API, and fully managed chat infrastructure for your mobile apps and websites. Embeddable chat for iOS, Android, JavaScript, Unity, .NET. ...

  • Firebase
    Firebase

    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds. ...

  • PubNub
    PubNub

    PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server. ...

  • Twilio
    Twilio

    Twilio offers developers a powerful API for phone services to make and receive phone calls, and send and receive text messages. Their product allows programmers to more easily integrate various communication methods into their software and programs. ...

  • CometChat
    CometChat

    CometChat offers a comprehensive in-app chat SDK platform that equips businesses with the tools to integrate real-time chat, voice, and video into their applications. ...

  • OpenTok
    OpenTok

    It adds the clarity and emotion of face-to-face communication to your brand whether you're developing for the web, iOS, or Android. We make the integration of high-quality live video a breeze so that you can focus on building a great product. ...

  • Layer
    Layer

    Layer's asynchronous messaging fabric is capable of transporting payloads of any type. Get your users talking with chat, voice or video messaging. Pull them back in with push. Connect friends, colleagues or perfect strangers seamlessly. ...

  • Agora
    Agora

    Agora.io provides building blocks for you to add real-time voice and video communications through a simple and powerful SDK. You can integrate the Agora SDK to enable real-time communications in your own application quickly. ...

QuickBlox alternatives & related posts

SendBird logo

SendBird

138
402
78
A Complete Chat Platform, Messaging and Chat SDK and API
138
402
+ 1
78
PROS OF SENDBIRD
  • 13
    Active support is impressive. (Support for private deve
  • 10
    Pre-built UI for major platforms
  • 10
    Easy to use
  • 8
    Migration API for customers using other chat services
  • 7
    Scalability is awesome
  • 7
    First chat SDK officially supports Xamarin
  • 5
    Because my product guy told me to
  • 5
    Unlimited number of users in public chat
  • 5
    Cool product
  • 4
    Flexible message format ex) json, xml
  • 2
    Out of the box api and features
  • 2
    Intuitive and feature-packed
CONS OF SENDBIRD
  • 2
    Policy on concurrent users leads to overages and overch
  • 2
    Prices ramp up exponentially

related SendBird posts

Shared insights
on
StreamStreamSendBirdSendBirdFlutterFlutter

I am interested in using a chat SDK for a community mobile Flutter app. I am between SendBird and Stream. I currently have 2,000 monthly active users and plan to have close to 5,000 active users chatting on the app. Has anyone used either and had good/bad experiences? Currently, there is no chat functionality, and we would like to have a 1-to-1 user chat, group chat, and large community chat capabilities.

See more
Yeongju Park
SW Web Engineer at Sense Korea · | 4 upvotes · 74.9K views
Shared insights
on
MSSQLMSSQLSendBirdSendBirdCometChatCometChat

I am considering which chat solution to choose between CometChat and SendBird, for our new app. The condition is, the app is going to run in a private network and has to connect with MSSQL. Any advice on other things I have to consider before choosing one, or is there another chat service you would recommend? Thank you!

See more
Firebase logo

Firebase

40.2K
34.5K
2K
The Realtime App Platform
40.2K
34.5K
+ 1
2K
PROS OF FIREBASE
  • 371
    Realtime backend made easy
  • 270
    Fast and responsive
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 215
    Real-time
  • 191
    JSON
  • 134
    Free
  • 128
    Backed by google
  • 83
    Angular adaptor
  • 68
    Reliable
  • 36
    Great customer support
  • 32
    Great documentation
  • 25
    Real-time synchronization
  • 21
    Mobile friendly
  • 18
    Rapid prototyping
  • 14
    Great security
  • 12
    Automatic scaling
  • 11
    Freakingly awesome
  • 8
    Chat
  • 8
    Angularfire is an amazing addition!
  • 8
    Super fast development
  • 6
    Built in user auth/oauth
  • 6
    Firebase hosting
  • 6
    Ios adaptor
  • 6
    Awesome next-gen backend
  • 4
    Speed of light
  • 4
    Very easy to use
  • 3
    Great
  • 3
    It's made development super fast
  • 3
    Brilliant for startups
  • 2
    Free hosting
  • 2
    Cloud functions
  • 2
    JS Offline and Sync suport
  • 2
    Low battery consumption
  • 2
    .net
  • 2
    The concurrent updates create a great experience
  • 2
    Push notification
  • 2
    I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
  • 2
    Great all-round functionality
  • 2
    Free authentication solution
  • 1
    Easy Reactjs integration
  • 1
    Google's support
  • 1
    Free SSL
  • 1
    CDN & cache out of the box
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Large
  • 1
    Faster workflow
  • 1
    Serverless
  • 1
    Good Free Limits
  • 1
    Simple and easy
CONS OF FIREBASE
  • 31
    Can become expensive
  • 16
    No open source, you depend on external company
  • 15
    Scalability is not infinite
  • 9
    Not Flexible Enough
  • 7
    Cant filter queries
  • 3
    Very unstable server
  • 3
    No Relational Data
  • 2
    Too many errors
  • 2
    No offline sync

related Firebase posts

Johnny Bell

I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

See more
Collins Ogbuzuru
Front-end dev at Evolve credit · | 16 upvotes · 10.8K views

Your tech stack is solid for building a real-time messaging project.

React and React Native are excellent choices for the frontend, especially if you want to have both web and mobile versions of your application share code.

ExpressJS is an unopinionated framework that affords you the flexibility to use it's features at your term, which is a good start. However, I would recommend you explore Sails.js as well. Sails.js is built on top of Express.js and it provides additional features out of the box, especially the Websocket integration that your project requires.

Don't forget to set up Graphql codegen, this would improve your dev experience (Add Typescript, if you can too).

I don't know much about databases but you might want to consider using NO-SQL. I used Firebase real-time db and aws dynamo db on a few of my personal projects and I love they're easy to work with and offer more flexibility for a chat application.

See more
PubNub logo

PubNub

236
456
238
Build real-time apps quickly and scale them globally.
236
456
+ 1
238
PROS OF PUBNUB
  • 36
    Massively scalable & easy to use
  • 25
    Easy setup
  • 20
    Reliable
  • 19
    Great support
  • 14
    Flexible to integrate to custom applications
  • 13
    Sockets at Scale
  • 13
    99.999% availability guarantees
  • 13
    High-Performance
  • 12
    High-Reliability
  • 12
    Multiplexing
  • 7
    Scalability
  • 5
    High-Availability
  • 5
    70+ SDKs
  • 4
    Security
  • 4
    Azure Add-on
  • 3
    Heroku Add-on
  • 3
    Presence
  • 3
    Flexible
  • 3
    Easy to setup
  • 2
    Data Streams
  • 2
    Free Plan
  • 2
    Server-Side Cache
  • 2
    PhoneGap Plugin
  • 2
    AngularJS Adapter
  • 2
    Data Sync
  • 2
    Analytics
  • 2
    Support
  • 1
    Easy setup and very reliable
  • 1
    High cost, going up more in Summer '15
  • 1
    Cool
  • 1
    Angular 2+ integration
  • 1
    Documentation, easy to use, great people/service
  • 1
    CTO stephen also is A++++++
  • 1
    Real time and easy to use.
  • 1
    Easy integration with iOS apps
CONS OF PUBNUB
  • 1
    Costly

related PubNub posts

I love Python and JavaScript . You can do the same JavaScript async operations in Python by using asyncio. This is particularly useful when you need to do socket programming in Python. With streaming sockets, data can be sent or received at any time. In case your Python program is in the middle of executing some code, other threads can handle the new socket data. Libraries like asyncio implement multiple threads, so your Python program can work in an asynchronous fashion. PubNub makes bi-directional data streaming between devices even easier.

See more

Vue.js vuex Quasar Framework PubNub Apache Cordova Spring Boot We built our phone app using apache cordova since it has plugins for all native mobile functionality that we needed , and it saved us time rather than maintaining separate native swift and android codebase. We used an upcoming framework called quasar that helped us bootstrap our cordova project in vue js , and also has a ton of built in vue components. In order to push data to our phone on the fly , we used pubnub. It was super easy to add in a few lines to code to do this. We would save data on the server , and use pubnub to communicate updates to all the clients. Another nifty feature offered by pubnub that we used was mobile notifications delivery. : you send data to pubnub who inturn forward it to apns or firebase depending on the payload. On the server side we used plain old spring boot application , and configured cross domain communication to allow requests from ://file domain. ( Corodva app is a bunch of web html files packaged as app ).

We also heavily used cordova plugins to talk to phone , eg. cordova-plugin-calendar and cordova-plugin-local-notification : The second one was used to generate notifications from within the app , when the app is already open but you are in a different screen and want user to be notified . If the app is not open native push notifications delivered through apns / firebase would show.

I am pretty happy with out decision . other than the fact that quasar framework got recently upgraded to v1 and some of the newer components that replace the older ones do not maintain the same look and feel , an example of that is linked below.

See more
Twilio logo

Twilio

11.1K
8.5K
521
Bring voice and messaging to your web and mobile applications.
11.1K
8.5K
+ 1
521
PROS OF TWILIO
  • 148
    Powerful, simple, and well documented api
  • 88
    RESTful API
  • 66
    Clear pricing
  • 61
    Great sms services
  • 58
    Low cost of entry
  • 29
    Global SMS Gateway
  • 14
    Good value
  • 12
    Cloud IVR
  • 11
    Simple
  • 11
    Extremely simple to integrate with rails
  • 6
    Great for startups
  • 5
    SMS
  • 3
    Great developer program
  • 3
    Hassle free
  • 2
    Text me the app pages
  • 1
    New Features constantly rolling out
  • 1
    Many deployment options, from build from scratch to buy
  • 1
    Easy integration
  • 1
    Two factor authentication
CONS OF TWILIO
  • 4
    Predictable pricing
  • 2
    Expensive

related Twilio posts

Tom Klein

Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

See more
Ravi Sathanapalli
Director Product Management at Centime · | 6 upvotes · 97.5K views
Shared insights
on
TwilioTwilioAmazon SNSAmazon SNS

Hi, We are looking to implement 2FA - so that users would be sent a Verification code over their Email and SMS to their phone.

We faced some limitations with Amazon SNS where we could either send the verification code to email OR to the phone number, while we want to send it to both.

We also are looking to make the 2FA more flexible by adding any other options later on.

What are the best alternatives to SNS for this use case and purpose? Looked at Twilio but want to explore other options before making a decision.

Would be great to know what the experience with Twilio has been, especially the limitations/issues with Twilio...

Appreciate any input from users of Twilio and others who have had similar use cases.

See more
CometChat logo

CometChat

11
44
0
Seamless Real-Time Chat Integration for Your Applications
11
44
+ 1
0
PROS OF COMETCHAT
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF COMETCHAT
      Be the first to leave a con

      related CometChat posts

      Yeongju Park
      SW Web Engineer at Sense Korea · | 4 upvotes · 74.9K views
      Shared insights
      on
      MSSQLMSSQLSendBirdSendBirdCometChatCometChat

      I am considering which chat solution to choose between CometChat and SendBird, for our new app. The condition is, the app is going to run in a private network and has to connect with MSSQL. Any advice on other things I have to consider before choosing one, or is there another chat service you would recommend? Thank you!

      See more
      OpenTok logo

      OpenTok

      57
      158
      8
      Build live interactive video, voice and messaging into your web and mobile apps
      57
      158
      + 1
      8
      PROS OF OPENTOK
      • 6
        Video Archiving to s3
      • 2
        Easy setup
      CONS OF OPENTOK
        Be the first to leave a con

        related OpenTok posts

        Shared insights
        on
        Amazon ChimeAmazon ChimeOpenTokOpenTok

        OpenTok vs Amazon Chime for pro VC?

        See more
        Layer logo

        Layer

        16
        39
        7
        Build messaging, voice and video right into your app in minutes.
        16
        39
        + 1
        7
        PROS OF LAYER
        • 6
          Open source ui atlas makes messaging easy
        • 1
          Easy setup
        CONS OF LAYER
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Layer posts

          Agora logo

          Agora

          101
          287
          12
          The Real-Time Engagement platform for devs to integrate voice & video chat, interactive live streaming, and messaging
          101
          287
          + 1
          12
          PROS OF AGORA
          • 7
            Easy setup
          • 5
            RESTful API
          CONS OF AGORA
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Agora posts

            Hello. So, I wanted to make a decision on whether to use WebRTC or Amazon Chime for a conference call (meeting). My plan is to build an app with features like video broadcasting, and the ability for all the participants to talk and chat. I have used Agora's web SDK for video broadcasting, and Socket.IO for chat features. As I read the comparison between Amazon Chime and WebRTC, it further intrigues me on what I should use given my scenario? Is there any way that so many related technologies could be a hindrance to the other? Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks. Ritwik Neema

            See more

            Hi, Stackshare community, I plan to build an app where people can go live, and users can watch him, 1 to many, follow each other, and text.

            I am expecting a huge number of users to use the app in the first month (100k+)

            I made the UX/UI design, and my designer asked me to find a developer.

            I want your advice. What server is the best for video quality and fast text messages (like uplive, bigo)?

            Ex. Agora, Twilio, Amazon Chime, Aws, or fiberbass

            I need for both operating systems, (ios, android). Do you recommend Flutter?

            • I have AWS server in my country (Bahrain), and 80% of the audience are from the same area. Does it help in the video quality between the audience?

            Thank you for this helpful website.

            See more