StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Selenide vs react-testing-library

Selenide vs react-testing-library

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Selenide
Selenide
Stacks56
Followers85
Votes16
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
react-testing-library
react-testing-library
Stacks297
Followers156
Votes4

Selenide vs react-testing-library: What are the differences?

Introduction

Selenide and react-testing-library are popular testing frameworks used in web development. While they both serve the purpose of testing web applications, there are key differences between the two.

1. Test Execution: Selenide is built on top of Selenium WebDriver and executes tests in a real browser, allowing interaction with elements and simulating user actions. On the other hand, react-testing-library executes tests in a virtual environment and focuses on testing the behavior of components rather than interacting with them directly.

2. DOM Traversal: Selenide provides a rich set of methods and selectors to easily traverse the DOM (Document Object Model) and interact with elements on the page. In react-testing-library, the emphasis is on testing the final rendered output and it encourages selecting elements based on their user-visible content, rather than relying on specific selectors.

3. Component Isolation: Selenide does not inherently provide support for isolating components during testing. It focuses more on end-to-end testing scenarios. react-testing-library, on the other hand, encourages the isolation of components and their testing in isolation to ensure independent functionality.

4. Framework and Technology Stack: Selenide is primarily used for testing applications built on Java and Selenium WebDriver stack. react-testing-library is specifically designed for testing React components and integrates well with the React ecosystem.

5. Test Maintainability: Selenide tests tend to be more verbose and require explicit actions for element interactions, which can make the tests harder to maintain in the long term. react-testing-library promotes more declarative and concise tests, which are easier to read and maintain.

6. Learning Curve: Selenide requires knowledge of Java and Selenium WebDriver, which can have a steep learning curve for beginners. react-testing-library, on the other hand, is relatively easier to learn for developers familiar with React.

In Summary, Selenide focuses on end-to-end testing in real browsers using Selenium WebDriver, while react-testing-library emphasizes testing React components in isolation with a focus on behavior rather than direct interaction with the DOM.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Selenide, react-testing-library

Esther
Esther

Feb 16, 2020

Needs adviceonreact-testing-libraryreact-testing-library

Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!

96.5k views96.5k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenide
Selenide
react-testing-library
react-testing-library

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

It is a simple and complete React DOM testing utility that encourage good testing practices. It provides light utility functions on top of react-dom and react-dom/test-utils, in a way that encourages better testing practices.

Concise fluent API for tests; Ajax support for stable tests; Powerful selectors; Simple configuration
light-weight solution for testing; React DOM testing utilities; works with any environment that provides DOM APIs;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
56
Stacks
297
Followers
85
Followers
156
Votes
16
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Nice JAVA API
  • 2
    Very mature API
  • 2
    File upload support
  • 2
    Integrated with Selenium-Jupiter framework
  • 2
    Integrated with WebDriverManager project
Cons
  • 1
    Hybrid page model not possible
Pros
  • 3
    We can test behavior
  • 1
    Good documentation
Integrations
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Android Studio
Android Studio
Selendroid
Selendroid
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
Vue.js
Vue.js
React
React
AngularJS
AngularJS

What are some alternatives to Selenide, react-testing-library?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana