StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Messaging
  4. Voice And SMS
  5. Agora vs Jitsi

Agora vs Jitsi

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Agora
Agora
Stacks101
Followers290
Votes14
Jitsi
Jitsi
Stacks251
Followers720
Votes93
GitHub Stars4.3K
Forks983

Agora vs Jitsi: What are the differences?

Comparison between Agora and Jitsi

Introduction: In the realm of video conferencing and collaboration tools, Agora and Jitsi are popular choices. Both platforms offer unique features and functionalities. Let's explore the key differences between Agora and Jitsi.

  1. Scalability: Agora provides scalable real-time engagement with millions of concurrent users, making it suitable for large-scale conferences, classes, and social events. On the other hand, Jitsi can handle moderate-sized meetings with hundreds of participants, making it more suitable for small to medium-sized gatherings.

  2. Video Quality: Agora focuses on providing high-definition video quality with low latency. This ensures a smooth and immersive experience for users. Jitsi, while also offering decent video quality, may not provide the same level of clarity as Agora, especially in large gatherings or under challenging network conditions.

  3. Ease of Use: Jitsi prides itself on its simplicity and ease of use. With a user-friendly interface and a straightforward setup process, Jitsi allows users to quickly initiate video conferences without requiring any downloads or installations. Agora, on the other hand, offers more advanced features and customization options, but it may have a steeper learning curve for first-time users.

  4. Security and Privacy: Agora places a strong emphasis on security and data privacy. It ensures end-to-end encryption and offers advanced security features to protect sensitive information. Jitsi, while also offering encryption, may not provide the same level of security measures as Agora. Users with high-security needs may prefer Agora for sensitive discussions.

  5. Integration and Compatibility: Agora provides extensive integration options with various platforms and programming languages, allowing developers to build customized applications and workflows. Jitsi, although it offers integrations, may not provide the same level of flexibility and compatibility as Agora.

  6. Customization and Branding: Agora allows developers and businesses to customize and brand their video conferencing experiences, providing a seamless user interface that aligns with their brand identity. Jitsi, while it offers some customization options, may not provide the same level of branding capabilities as Agora.

Summary: In summary, Agora excels in scalability, video quality, security, compatibility, and customization options, making it more suitable for large-scale, customized applications. Jitsi, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity, ease of use, and quick setup, making it a great choice for small to medium-sized gatherings with moderate security requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Agora
Agora
Jitsi
Jitsi

Agora.io provides building blocks for you to add real-time voice and video communications through a simple and powerful SDK. You can integrate the Agora SDK to enable real-time communications in your own application quickly.

Jitsi (acquired by 8x8) is a set of open-source projects that allows you to easily build and deploy secure videoconferencing solutions. At the heart of Jitsi are Jitsi Videobridge and Jitsi Meet, which let you have conferences on the internet, while other projects in the community enable other features such as audio, dial-in, recording, and simulcasting.

-
Web, Android, iOS, React-native, and Electron apps;Ubuntu and Debian Packages install in minutes;Customize with config files or change the code
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
4.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
983
Stacks
101
Stacks
251
Followers
290
Followers
720
Votes
14
Votes
93
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Easy setup
  • 6
    RESTful API
Pros
  • 32
    Open Source
  • 20
    Entirely free conferencing
  • 19
    Unlimited time
  • 5
    Accessible from browser
  • 3
    Desktop, app and browser tab sharing
Cons
  • 7
    UnLimited time
  • 5
    No multiplatform
  • 1
    Great quality
  • 1
    Live conference statistics
  • 1
    Good support
Integrations
Android SDK
Android SDK
Electron
Electron
Unity
Unity
Flutter
Flutter
React Native
React Native
Cocoa Touch (iOS)
Cocoa Touch (iOS)
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Agora, Jitsi?

Discord

Discord

Discord is a modern free voice & text chat app for groups of gamers. Our resilient Erlang backend running on the cloud has built in DDoS protection with automatic server failover.

Skype

Skype

Skype’s text, voice and video make it simple to share experiences with the people that matter to you, wherever they are.

Twilio

Twilio

Twilio offers developers a powerful API for phone services to make and receive phone calls, and send and receive text messages. Their product allows programmers to more easily integrate various communication methods into their software and programs.

Zoom

Zoom

Zoom unifies cloud video conferencing, simple online meetings, and cross platform group chat into one easy-to-use platform. Our solution offers the best video, audio, and screen-sharing experience across Zoom Rooms, Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, and H.323/SIP room systems.

Google Meet

Google Meet

It is the business-oriented version of Google's Hangouts platform and is suitable for businesses of all sizes. It allows users to dial in phone numbers to access meetings, thus enabling users with slow internet connection to call in.

Chat by Stream

Chat by Stream

Chat API and SDK. With a beautiful UI Kit, easy to use React Components and powerful API. Add Chat to any application in a matter of hours. The tech uses Go, RocksDB and Raft. By the creators of Stream, the API that powers activity feeds for more than 300 million users.

SendBird

SendBird

SendBird is a Messaging SDK, Chat API, and fully managed chat infrastructure for your mobile apps and websites. Embeddable chat for iOS, Android, JavaScript, Unity, .NET.

Nexmo

Nexmo

Nexmo connects your apps directly to carriers around the world. Integrate SMS and Voice messages using one simple API. Use Nexmo Verity to register users, verify transactions, and implement two factor authentication.

Sinch

Sinch

Sinch makes it easy for developers to add voice, messaging and SMS to their apps with just a few lines of code. Enrich your apps with communications that your users will love.

Plivo

Plivo

Plivo provides basic building block APIs in the form of Plivo XML and HTTP API, to create telephony apps, so developers can completely do away with learning the nitty-gritty of the telephony plumbing.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope