Akamai vs Panda

Overview

Akamai

Stacks1.9K

Followers442

Votes0

Panda

Stacks14

Followers28

Votes0

Akamai vs Panda: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Akamai and Panda, both are content delivery networks (CDN) that help optimize web performance, security, and reliability. However, there are distinct differences between the two platforms that cater to different needs and objectives.

Network Coverage: Akamai has one of the most extensive global networks, with servers strategically placed in numerous locations worldwide, ensuring low latency and high reliability. In contrast, Panda has a more concentrated network that focuses primarily on select regions, potentially leading to slower load times for users in other areas.
Security Features: Akamai is well-known for its robust security services, including DDoS protection, web application firewalls, and bot management tools. On the other hand, while Panda also offers security solutions, they may not be as comprehensive or advanced as those provided by Akamai.
Customization Options: Akamai provides a wide range of customization options and advanced configurations to fine-tune CDN performance according to the specific needs of each client. Panda, on the other hand, may have more limited customization capabilities, making it less suitable for complex or specialized requirements.
Speed and Performance: Akamai is recognized for its exceptional speed and performance optimization features, leveraging advanced caching techniques and edge computing to deliver content quickly to end-users. Panda's performance may be competent but could potentially be outperformed by Akamai in terms of speed and reliability.
Price Point: Generally, Akamai is perceived to be on the higher end of the pricing spectrum due to its premium services, extensive network coverage, and advanced features. In comparison, Panda may offer more competitive pricing options, making it a more budget-friendly choice for organizations with limited resources.
Customer Support and Service Level Agreements (SLAs): Akamai typically provides top-notch customer support and offers robust SLAs to guarantee service availability and performance. Panda's support services and SLAs may vary in terms of responsiveness and reliability, potentially impacting the overall customer experience.

In Summary, Akamai and Panda differ significantly in network coverage, security features, customization options, speed and performance, pricing, and customer support offerings.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Akamai	Panda
If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward.	Panda is a cloud-based platform that provides video and audio encoding infrastructure. It features lightning fast encoding, and broad support for a huge number of video and audio codecs. You can upload to Panda either from your own web application using our REST API, or by utilizing our easy to use web interface.<br>
Protect your apps and APIs, stop credential abuse, and move to a Zero Trust security model with the world’s most powerful edge security platform; Focus on increasing revenue with powerful data and automation built to enhance customer experience on web and mobile applications; Deliver and monetize high-quality and secure online streaming experiences; Quickly integrate Akamai into existing developer workflows, streamlining cloud deployment and delivery	Unlimited encoding- When we say unlimited we mean unlimited. With your own dedicated resources, you can upload as much media as you like with no per-minute charge.;Deliver everywhere- Encode your videos to be viewable in any browser, with any player, on any device.;High definition- From the cellphone to the big screen, your video will always look gorgeous with 1080p HD video.;Broad format support- We support all of the most popular video and audio codecs including H.264, AAC, OGG, MP3, FlV, MP4 and many more;Web interface- Panda is easy for everyone with our innovative web interface that provides a straightforward process to upload, encode and monitor your content.;iPhone and iPad streaming- We support Apple HTTP Live Streaming (HLS), which dynamically adjusts the movie quality to match the speed of a connecting device.;Choose your region- Choose whether you want your video to be transferred and encoded in North America (USA) or in Europe (UK).;Supported Langyages: RUBY, PHP, PYTHON, OBJECTIVE-C, NODE.JS, MICROSOFT .NET<br>
Statistics
Stacks 1.9K	Stacks 14
Followers 442	Followers 28
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Cloudinary Cloudability	Heroku

What are some alternatives to Akamai, Panda?

CloudFlare

Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet.

Amazon CloudFront

Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance.

KeyCDN

KeyCDN offers super fast and secure content delivery for minimal loading time. In addition to the CDN, it also offers advanced image processing and many other features such as live logs and Let's Encrypt SSL.

Fastly

Fastly's real-time content delivery network gives you total control over your content, unprecedented access to performance analytics, and the ability to instantly update content in 150 milliseconds.

MaxCDN

The MaxCDN Content Delivery Network efficiently delivers your site’s static file through hundreds of servers instead of slogging through a single host. This "smart route" technology distributes your content to your visitors via the city closest to them.

jsDelivr

jsDelivr is a free CDN for open source developers, with advanced features for javascript projects with access to NPM and Github It uses multiple CDN providers, resulting in the best possible uptime and performance.

Moovweb XDN

All-in-one platform to develop, deploy, preview, experiment on, monitor, and run your frontend.

Limelight CDN

Whether it’s your website, mobile applications, videos, music, software, games, or APIs, your content needs to reach customers quickly, reliably, and securely. It provides the capacity, coverage, and performance to cost-effectively deliver a better experience for you and your customers.

cdnjs

Everyone loves the Google CDN? Even Microsoft runs their own CDN. The problem is, they only host the most popular libraries. We host it all - JavaScript, CSS, SWF, images, etc! Powered by CloudFlare.

Zencoder

Zencoder downloads the video and converts it to as many formats as you need. Every output is encoded concurrently, with virtually no waiting—whether you do one or one hundred. Zencoder then uploads the resulting videos to a server, CDN, an S3 bucket, or wherever you dictate in your API call.

Related Comparisons

Akamai vs Panda: What are the differences?

Introduction

Network Coverage: Akamai has one of the most extensive global networks, with servers strategically placed in numerous locations worldwide, ensuring low latency and high reliability. In contrast, Panda has a more concentrated network that focuses primarily on select regions, potentially leading to slower load times for users in other areas.
Security Features: Akamai is well-known for its robust security services, including DDoS protection, web application firewalls, and bot management tools. On the other hand, while Panda also offers security solutions, they may not be as comprehensive or advanced as those provided by Akamai.
Customization Options: Akamai provides a wide range of customization options and advanced configurations to fine-tune CDN performance according to the specific needs of each client. Panda, on the other hand, may have more limited customization capabilities, making it less suitable for complex or specialized requirements.
Speed and Performance: Akamai is recognized for its exceptional speed and performance optimization features, leveraging advanced caching techniques and edge computing to deliver content quickly to end-users. Panda's performance may be competent but could potentially be outperformed by Akamai in terms of speed and reliability.
Price Point: Generally, Akamai is perceived to be on the higher end of the pricing spectrum due to its premium services, extensive network coverage, and advanced features. In comparison, Panda may offer more competitive pricing options, making it a more budget-friendly choice for organizations with limited resources.
Customer Support and Service Level Agreements (SLAs): Akamai typically provides top-notch customer support and offers robust SLAs to guarantee service availability and performance. Panda's support services and SLAs may vary in terms of responsiveness and reliability, potentially impacting the overall customer experience.

In Summary, Akamai and Panda differ significantly in network coverage, security features, customization options, speed and performance, pricing, and customer support offerings.

Akamai vs Panda

Overview

Akamai vs Panda: What are the differences?