Amazon CloudFront vs CacheFly

Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Amazon CloudFront
Amazon CloudFront

10.9K
3K
+ 1
935
CacheFly
CacheFly

16
6
+ 1
0
Add tool

Amazon CloudFront vs CacheFly: What are the differences?

What is Amazon CloudFront? Content delivery with low latency and high data transfer speeds. Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance.

What is CacheFly? A leading content delivery network provider based in Chicago, IL. CacheFly is the world’s fastest Content Delivery Network (CDN), delivering rich-media content up to 10x faster than traditional delivery methods. Launched in 2002 as the first TCP anycast-based CDN, CacheFly pioneered the ability to deliver rich-media content faster and more reliably than traditional delivery methods.

Amazon CloudFront and CacheFly belong to "Content Delivery Network" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by Amazon CloudFront are:

  • Fast- Using a network of edge locations around the world, Amazon CloudFront caches copies of your static content close to viewers, lowering latency when they download your objects and giving you the high, sustained data transfer rates needed to deliver large popular objects to end users at scale.
  • Simple- A single API call lets you get started distributing content from your Amazon S3 bucket or Amazon EC2 instance or other origin server through the Amazon CloudFront network.
  • Designed for use with other Amazon Web Services Amazon CloudFront is designed for use with other Amazon Web Services, including Amazon S3, where you can durably store the definitive versions of your static files, and Amazon EC2, where you can run your application server for dynamically generated content.

On the other hand, CacheFly provides the following key features:

  • Up to 10x faster performance
  • Lower bandwidth costs
  • Scalable, on-demand capacity
No Stats
- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Amazon CloudFront?

Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance.

What is CacheFly?

CacheFly is the world’s fastest Content Delivery Network (CDN), delivering rich-media content up to 10x faster than traditional delivery methods. Launched in 2002 as the first TCP anycast-based CDN, CacheFly pioneered the ability to deliver rich-media content faster and more reliably than traditional delivery methods.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Amazon CloudFront?
Why do developers choose CacheFly?
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

      Be the first to leave a con
      What companies use Amazon CloudFront?
      What companies use CacheFly?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Amazon CloudFront?
      What tools integrate with CacheFly?
        No integrations found

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        What are some alternatives to Amazon CloudFront and CacheFly?
        Akamai
        If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward.
        CloudFlare
        Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet.
        Google Cloud Storage
        Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.
        Fastly
        Fastly's real-time content delivery network gives you total control over your content, unprecedented access to performance analytics, and the ability to instantly update content in 150 milliseconds.
        MaxCDN
        The MaxCDN Content Delivery Network efficiently delivers your site’s static file through hundreds of servers instead of slogging through a single host. This "smart route" technology distributes your content to your visitors via the city closest to them.
        See all alternatives
        Decisions about Amazon CloudFront and CacheFly
        Johnny Bell
        Johnny Bell
        Senior Software Engineer at StackShare · | 8 upvotes · 75.6K views
        GitHub
        GitHub
        Netlify
        Netlify
        Amazon S3
        Amazon S3
        Buddy
        Buddy
        Amazon CloudFront
        Amazon CloudFront
        CloudFlare
        CloudFlare
        Code Climate
        Code Climate
        #Devops
        #Webpack
        #Git
        #Gzip

        When I first built my portfolio I used GitHub for the source control and deployed directly to Netlify on a push to master. This was a perfect setup, I didn't need any knowledge about #DevOps or anything, it was all just done for me.

        One of the issues I had with Netlify was I wanted to gzip my JavaScript files, I had this setup in my #Webpack file, however Netlify didn't offer an easy way to set this.

        Over the weekend I decided I wanted to know more about how #DevOps worked so I decided to switch from Netlify to Amazon S3. Instead of creating any #Git Webhooks I decided to use Buddy for my pipeline and to run commands. Buddy is a fantastic tool, very easy to setup builds, copying the files to my Amazon S3 bucket, then running some #AWS console commands to set the content-encoding of the JavaScript files. - Buddy is also free if you only have a few pipelines, so I didn't need to pay anything 🤙🏻.

        When I made these changes I also wanted to monitor my code, and make sure I was keeping up with the best practices so I implemented Code Climate to look over my code and tell me where there code smells, issues, and other issues I've been super happy with it so far, on the free tier so its also free.

        I did plan on using Amazon CloudFront for my SSL and cacheing, however it was overly complex to setup and it costs money. So I decided to go with the free tier of CloudFlare and it is amazing, best choice I've made for caching / SSL in a long time.

        See more
        Johnny Bell
        Johnny Bell
        Senior Software Engineer at StackShare · | 7 upvotes · 35.8K views
        Amazon S3
        Amazon S3
        Amazon CloudFront
        Amazon CloudFront
        CloudFlare
        CloudFlare

        I recently moved my portfolio to Amazon S3 and I needed a new way to cache and SSL my site as Amazon S3 does not come with this right out of the box. I tried Amazon CloudFront as I was already on Amazon S3 I thought this would be super easy and straight forward to setup... It was not, I was unable to get this working even though I followed all the online steps and even reached out for help to Amazon.

        I'd used CloudFlare in the past, and thought let me see if I can set up CloudFlare on an Amazon S3 bucket. The setup for this was so basic and easy... I had it setup with caching and SSL within 5 minutes, and it was 100% free.

        See more
        Bram Verdonck
        Bram Verdonck
        Founder at CloudvCard · | 5 upvotes · 9.5K views
        atCloudvCardCloudvCard
        CloudFlare
        CloudFlare
        Amazon Route 53
        Amazon Route 53
        Amazon CloudFront
        Amazon CloudFront
        AWS CloudFormation
        AWS CloudFormation

        Yesterday we moved away from using CloudFlare towards Amazon Route 53 for a few reasons. Although CloudFlare is a great platform, once you reach almost a 100% AWS Service integration, it makes it hard to still use CloudFlare in the stack. Also being able to use Aliases for DNS makes it faster because instead of doing a CNAME and an A record lookup, you will be able to receive the A records from the end services directly. We always loved working with CloudFlare , especially for DNS as we already used Amazon CloudFront for CDN. But having everything within AWS makes it "cleaner" when deploying automatically using AWS CloudFormation. All that aside, the main reason for moving towards Amazon Route 53 for DNS is the ability to do geolocation and latency based DNS responses. Doing this outside the AWS console would increase the complexity.

        See more
        Interest over time
        Reviews of Amazon CloudFront and CacheFly
        Review ofAmazon CloudFrontAmazon CloudFront

        I love CloudFront. All my assets are hosted by them, and they cut page load time in half, and my average bill is around $0.15/month. They're good, fast, and cheap — pick three!

        How developers use Amazon CloudFront and CacheFly
        Avatar of StackShare
        StackShare uses Amazon CloudFrontAmazon CloudFront

        We chose CloudFront mostly because it’s incredibly popular. But also because it’s the recommended CDN for Heroku, which means there shouldn’t be any problems using them together. Rails makes it really easy to drop in a CDN reference for your app so that when your assets get compiled, they’re shipped off to the CDN and then deployed with your app.

        So anytime we push to Heroku, we’re pushing up to CloudFront (if the assets don’t already exist). One major issue we still haven’t been able to solve involves Fonts. Has anyone actually been able to get fonts served up through CloudFront using Rails 4 and Heroku? Literally spent hours researching this and can’t find any solutions. We ended up just referencing a CDN for all the font libraries.

        We have a separate distribution for each environment, since I don’t think it’s possible to use the same distribution for the multiple domains.

        Avatar of Volkan Özçelik
        Volkan Özçelik uses Amazon CloudFrontAmazon CloudFront

        I use CloudFront to front the static website at zerotoherojs.com that I host in an s3 bucket.

        This way, I don’t have to worry about scalability or performance, as I’ll know that the content will be delivered to the users as fast as possible from the closest edge location.

        Avatar of Pathwright
        Pathwright uses Amazon CloudFrontAmazon CloudFront

        Parked in front of an nginx instance that serves all of our static assets. Performance and reliability have been excellent, and the header pass-through rules are wonderful. Price is affordable, as well.

        Avatar of Jeff Flynn
        Jeff Flynn uses Amazon CloudFrontAmazon CloudFront

        In my opinion, the best Content Delivery Network for the money. This, along with other services from AWS's ecosystem make this the easy choice for CDN. Fast, simple and cheap.

        Avatar of CloudRepo
        CloudRepo uses Amazon CloudFrontAmazon CloudFront

        We use this because it's a CDN that sits in front of our static resources hosted in S3. It makes it so that users in other countries can have quick access to our portal.

        How much does Amazon CloudFront cost?
        How much does CacheFly cost?
        News about CacheFly
        More news