Amazon DynamoDBย vsย Mongoose

Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB

1.5K
917
+ 1
162
Mongoose
Mongoose

768
582
+ 1
38
Add tool

Amazon DynamoDB vs Mongoose: What are the differences?

What is Amazon DynamoDB? Fully managed NoSQL database service. All data items are stored on Solid State Drives (SSDs), and are replicated across 3 Availability Zones for high availability and durability. With DynamoDB, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

What is Mongoose? MongoDB object modeling designed to work in an asynchronous environment. Let's face it, writing MongoDB validation, casting and business logic boilerplate is a drag. That's why we wrote Mongoose. Mongoose provides a straight-forward, schema-based solution to modeling your application data and includes built-in type casting, validation, query building, business logic hooks and more, out of the box.

Amazon DynamoDB and Mongoose are primarily classified as "NoSQL Database as a Service" and "Object Document Mapper (ODM)" tools respectively.

"Predictable performance and cost" is the top reason why over 53 developers like Amazon DynamoDB, while over 14 developers mention "Well documented" as the leading cause for choosing Mongoose.

Mongoose is an open source tool with 19K GitHub stars and 2.63K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Mongoose's open source repository on GitHub.

According to the StackShare community, Amazon DynamoDB has a broader approval, being mentioned in 444 company stacks & 187 developers stacks; compared to Mongoose, which is listed in 88 company stacks and 92 developer stacks.

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Amazon DynamoDB?

With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

What is Mongoose?

Let's face it, writing MongoDB validation, casting and business logic boilerplate is a drag. That's why we wrote Mongoose. Mongoose provides a straight-forward, schema-based solution to modeling your application data and includes built-in type casting, validation, query building, business logic hooks and more, out of the box.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Amazon DynamoDB?
Why do developers choose Mongoose?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

What companies use Amazon DynamoDB?
What companies use Mongoose?

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Amazon DynamoDB?
What tools integrate with Mongoose?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Amazon DynamoDB and Mongoose?
Google Cloud Datastore
Use a managed, NoSQL, schemaless database for storing non-relational data. Cloud Datastore automatically scales as you need it and supports transactions as well as robust, SQL-like queries.
MongoDB
MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
Amazon SimpleDB
Developers simply store and query data items via web services requests and Amazon SimpleDB does the rest. Behind the scenes, Amazon SimpleDB creates and manages multiple geographically distributed replicas of your data automatically to enable high availability and data durability. Amazon SimpleDB provides a simple web services interface to create and store multiple data sets, query your data easily, and return the results. Your data is automatically indexed, making it easy to quickly find the information that you need. There is no need to pre-define a schema or change a schema if new data is added later. And scale-out is as simple as creating new domains, rather than building out new servers.
Amazon S3
Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web
MySQL
The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
See all alternatives
Decisions about Amazon DynamoDB and Mongoose
Doru Mihai
Doru Mihai
Solution Architect ยท | 4 upvotes ยท 453 views
Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB

I use Amazon DynamoDB because it integrates seamlessly with other AWS SaaS solutions and if cost is the primary concern early on, then this will be a better choice when compared to AWS RDS or any other solution that requires the creation of a HA cluster of IaaS components that will cost money just for being there, the costs not being influenced primarily by usage.

See more
Interest over time
Reviews of Amazon DynamoDB and Mongoose
Review ofMongooseMongoose

I inherited a stack where Mongoose is used in the database layer.

It's been several months and it's still the single highest source of daily WT*s in my backend development. The API is full of irregularities and the design is a poor mix of object-orientation and stateful objects with a lot implicit behavior. Mongoose made the choices of taking the worst parts of ORMs and using them in a context where the benefits of ORMs don't apply. The only reason I'm keeping it is its handy .populate() feature. Expect bad surprises!

How developers use Amazon DynamoDB and Mongoose
Avatar of Karma
Karma uses Amazon DynamoDBAmazon DynamoDB

For most of the stuff we use MySQL. We just use Amazon RDS. But for some stuff we use Amazon DynamoDB. We love DynamoDB. It's amazing. We store usage data in there, for example. I think we have close to seven or eight hundred million records in there and it's scaled like you don't even notice it. You never notice any performance degradation whatsoever. It's insane, and the last time I checked we were paying $150 bucks for that.

Avatar of Volkan ร–zรงelik
Volkan ร–zรงelik uses Amazon DynamoDBAmazon DynamoDB

zerotoherojs.com โ€™s userbase, and course details are stored in DynamoDB tables.

The good thing about AWS DynamoDB is: For the amount of traffic that I have, it is free. It is highly-scalable, it is managed by Amazon, and it is pretty fast.

It is, again, one less thing to worry about (when compared to managing your own MongoDB elsewhere).

Avatar of CloudRepo
CloudRepo uses Amazon DynamoDBAmazon DynamoDB

We store customer metadata in DynamoDB. We decided to use Amazon DynamoDB because it was a fully managed, highly available solution. We didn't want to operate our own SQL server and we wanted to ensure that we built CloudRepo on high availability components so that we could pass that benefit back to our customers.

Avatar of nrise
nrise uses Amazon DynamoDBAmazon DynamoDB

๋ช‡๋ช‡ ๋กœ๊ทธ๋Š” ํ˜„์žฌ AWS DynamoDB ์— ๊ธฐ๋ก๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ์„ ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด mongodb ๋กœ ์˜ฎ๊ธธ ๊ณ„ํš์„ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์•„์ฃผ ๊ฐ„๋‹จํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์Œ“๋Š” ์šฉ๋„๋กœ๋Š” ๋‚˜์˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋งŒ, ์ฟผ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ์•„์ฃผ ์ œํ•œ์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์ „์— ๋ฐ˜๋“œ์‹œ DynamoDB ์˜ ์ŠคํŽ™์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Avatar of HyperTrack
HyperTrack uses Amazon DynamoDBAmazon DynamoDB

To store device health records as it allows super fast writes and range queries.

Avatar of AyeDeals
AyeDeals uses MongooseMongoose

We use mongoose and node-native for database querying.

Avatar of anthillsolutions
anthillsolutions uses MongooseMongoose

No-brainer for accessing Objects with NodeJS.

How much does Amazon DynamoDB cost?
How much does Mongoose cost?
Pricing unavailable