Amazon ECR vs Docker Hub

Overview

Docker Hub

Stacks224

Followers262

Votes7

Amazon ECR

Stacks355

Followers166

Votes5

Amazon ECR vs Docker Hub: What are the differences?

Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR) and Docker Hub are two popular container registry services. Let's explore the key differences between them.

Hosting Environment: Amazon ECR is a fully managed container registry service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), whereas Docker Hub is a cloud-based container registry service provided by Docker. ECR is tightly integrated with other AWS services, such as Elastic Container Service (ECS) and Kubernetes on AWS (EKS), making it a preferred choice for AWS users. On the other hand, Docker Hub is an independent platform that supports multiple cloud providers.
Pricing Model: ECR follows the AWS pricing model, which charges users for the storage of container images and data transfer out of the registry. Docker Hub, however, offers both free and paid plans. The free plan has limited features and imposes rate limits, while the paid plans provide additional benefits such as private repositories and increased image quotas.
Security and Access Control: ECR leverages AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) to control access to container images, allowing fine-grained permissions management. It also supports resource-based policies for cross-account access. Docker Hub, on the other hand, provides basic access control using repository-level access tokens. Advanced access control features such as fine-grained permissions are only available for paid plans.
Integration with CI/CD Pipelines: ECR integrates well with AWS services like AWS CodePipeline and AWS CodeBuild, providing seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines. Docker Hub also offers integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins and Travis CI, enabling the efficient deployment of container images.
Availability and Reliability: ECR benefits from the highly available and scalable infrastructure of AWS, ensuring high uptime and reliability. Docker Hub has a good track record of availability but does not match the scalability and reliability of AWS.
Geo-Replication and Caching: ECR supports cross-region replication, allowing users to replicate container images across different AWS regions for improved data locality and redundancy. Docker Hub does not provide built-in geo-replication capabilities, but CDN caching is available to enhance the performance of image pulls.

In summary, Amazon ECR is a fully managed Docker container registry service provided by AWS, offering secure storage, encryption, and integration with AWS services like ECS and EKS. Docker Hub, on the other hand, is a public container registry providing a vast repository of Docker images, including official images, community-contributed images, and private repositories. While Amazon ECR is tightly integrated with AWS services and offers enhanced security features, Docker Hub provides a central hub for sharing and discovering Docker images across a diverse community of developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Docker Hub	Amazon ECR
It is the world's easiest way to create, manage, and deliver your teams' container applications. It is the perfect home for your teams' applications.	It is a fully managed container registry that makes it easy to store, manage, share, and deploy your container images and artifacts anywhere. It eliminates the need to operate your own container repositories or worry about scaling the underlying infrastructure.
-	Reduce your effort with a fully managed registry; Securely share and download container images; Provide fast and highly available access; Simplify your deployment workflow
Statistics
Stacks 224	Stacks 355
Followers 262	Followers 166
Votes 7	Votes 5
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Uses a very familiar collaboration model as GitHub, the 1 Allows users to set permissions to restrict access or s 1 Fairly inexpensive with usage based pricing 1 Security scanning available 1 Provides public and private repositories Cons 1 Lacks fine grain access control 1 Does not provide any insight into the registry usage 1 Lacks LDAP, SAML and OAuth support	Pros 2 Highly secure as policies can be configured to manage p 1 Tight integration with Amazon ECS and the Docker CLI, a 1 No upfront fees or commitments. You pay only for the am 1 Familiar to AWS users and easy to use Cons 1 Potentially expensive if the containers being deployed 1 Lack of insight into registry usage 1 Difficult to use with docker client as it requires crea
Integrations
No integrations available	Kubernetes Docker Amazon EKS AWS IAM

What are some alternatives to Docker Hub, Amazon ECR?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

Amazon ECR vs Docker Hub: What are the differences?

Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR) and Docker Hub are two popular container registry services. Let's explore the key differences between them.

Hosting Environment: Amazon ECR is a fully managed container registry service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), whereas Docker Hub is a cloud-based container registry service provided by Docker. ECR is tightly integrated with other AWS services, such as Elastic Container Service (ECS) and Kubernetes on AWS (EKS), making it a preferred choice for AWS users. On the other hand, Docker Hub is an independent platform that supports multiple cloud providers.
Pricing Model: ECR follows the AWS pricing model, which charges users for the storage of container images and data transfer out of the registry. Docker Hub, however, offers both free and paid plans. The free plan has limited features and imposes rate limits, while the paid plans provide additional benefits such as private repositories and increased image quotas.
Security and Access Control: ECR leverages AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) to control access to container images, allowing fine-grained permissions management. It also supports resource-based policies for cross-account access. Docker Hub, on the other hand, provides basic access control using repository-level access tokens. Advanced access control features such as fine-grained permissions are only available for paid plans.
Integration with CI/CD Pipelines: ECR integrates well with AWS services like AWS CodePipeline and AWS CodeBuild, providing seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines. Docker Hub also offers integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins and Travis CI, enabling the efficient deployment of container images.
Availability and Reliability: ECR benefits from the highly available and scalable infrastructure of AWS, ensuring high uptime and reliability. Docker Hub has a good track record of availability but does not match the scalability and reliability of AWS.
Geo-Replication and Caching: ECR supports cross-region replication, allowing users to replicate container images across different AWS regions for improved data locality and redundancy. Docker Hub does not provide built-in geo-replication capabilities, but CDN caching is available to enhance the performance of image pulls.

Amazon ECR vs Docker Hub

Overview