StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Real Time Data Processing
  5. Amazon Kinesis Firehose vs Google Cloud Dataflow

Amazon Kinesis Firehose vs Google Cloud Dataflow

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon Kinesis Firehose
Amazon Kinesis Firehose
Stacks239
Followers185
Votes0
Google Cloud Dataflow
Google Cloud Dataflow
Stacks219
Followers497
Votes19

Amazon Kinesis Firehose vs Google Cloud Dataflow: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Amazon Kinesis Firehose and Google Cloud Dataflow in terms of key differences.

  1. Pricing Model: Amazon Kinesis Firehose has a pricing model based on data volume ingested and time spent. In contrast, Google Cloud Dataflow offers a pricing model based on the number of CPU hours utilized for data processing.
  2. Real-time vs Batch Processing: Amazon Kinesis Firehose is primarily designed for real-time data streaming and loading into data lakes, data stores, or analytics services. On the other hand, Google Cloud Dataflow focuses on batch and stream processing capabilities, enabling the handling of both real-time and batch workloads.
  3. Managed Service vs Data Processing Framework: Amazon Kinesis Firehose is a fully managed service, handling scalability, durability, and reliability aspects. In comparison, Google Cloud Dataflow is a data processing framework that provides flexibility in building and customizing data processing pipelines.
  4. Integration with AWS vs Google Ecosystem: Amazon Kinesis Firehose seamlessly integrates with various AWS services, allowing easy integration into the broader AWS ecosystem. In contrast, Google Cloud Dataflow integrates well with the Google Cloud Platform, leveraging its services and features.
  5. Latency and Throughput: Amazon Kinesis Firehose provides low-latency data delivery with near real-time processing capabilities, suitable for scenarios requiring quick insights. Google Cloud Dataflow focuses on high-throughput processing, making it suitable for handling large-scale data processing tasks efficiently.
  6. Development Complexity and Flexibility: Amazon Kinesis Firehose offers a simpler setup and configuration process with limited customization options for data processing logic. Google Cloud Dataflow provides more development flexibility, allowing users to write custom code in different programming languages, providing greater control over the processing logic.

In Summary, Amazon Kinesis Firehose focuses on real-time streaming, simpler managed service, and seamless integration with AWS ecosystem, while Google Cloud Dataflow offers flexibility in building custom data processing pipelines, supports both batch and stream processing, and integrates well with Google Cloud Platform.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon Kinesis Firehose, Google Cloud Dataflow

Ryan
Ryan

Mar 11, 2021

Decided

Because we're getting continuous data from a variety of mediums and sources, we need a way to ingest data, process it, analyze it, and store it in a robust manner. AWS' tools provide just that. They make it easy to set up a data ingestion pipeline for handling gigabytes of data per second. GraphQL makes it easy for the front end to just query an API and get results in an efficient fashion, getting only the data we need. SwaggerHub makes it easy to make standardized OpenAPI's with consistent and predictable behavior.

23k views23k
Comments
Roel
Roel

Lead Developer at Di-Vision Consultion

Dec 14, 2020

Decided

Use case for ingressing a lot of data and post-process the data and forward it to multiple endpoints.

Kinesis can ingress a lot of data easier without have to manage scaling in DynamoDB (ondemand would be too expensive) We looked at DynamoDB Streams to hook up with Lambda, but Kinesis provides the same, and a backup incoming data to S3 with Firehose instead of using the TTL in DynamoDB.

21k views21k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon Kinesis Firehose
Amazon Kinesis Firehose
Google Cloud Dataflow
Google Cloud Dataflow

Amazon Kinesis Firehose is the easiest way to load streaming data into AWS. It can capture and automatically load streaming data into Amazon S3 and Amazon Redshift, enabling near real-time analytics with existing business intelligence tools and dashboards you’re already using today.

Google Cloud Dataflow is a unified programming model and a managed service for developing and executing a wide range of data processing patterns including ETL, batch computation, and continuous computation. Cloud Dataflow frees you from operational tasks like resource management and performance optimization.

Easy-to-Use;Integrated with AWS Data Stores;Automatic Elasticity;Near Real-time
Fully managed; Combines batch and streaming with a single API; High performance with automatic workload rebalancing Open source SDK;
Statistics
Stacks
239
Stacks
219
Followers
185
Followers
497
Votes
0
Votes
19
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 7
    Unified batch and stream processing
  • 5
    Autoscaling
  • 4
    Fully managed
  • 3
    Throughput Transparency
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Amazon Redshift
Amazon Redshift
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Amazon Kinesis Firehose, Google Cloud Dataflow?

Amazon Kinesis

Amazon Kinesis

Amazon Kinesis can collect and process hundreds of gigabytes of data per second from hundreds of thousands of sources, allowing you to easily write applications that process information in real-time, from sources such as web site click-streams, marketing and financial information, manufacturing instrumentation and social media, and operational logs and metering data.

Twister2

Twister2

It is a high-performance data processing framework with capabilities to handle streaming and batch data. It can leverage high-performance clusters as well we cloud services to efficiently process data.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope