StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Amazon LightSail vs Google App Engine

Amazon LightSail vs Google App Engine

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Stacks10.5K
Followers8.1K
Votes611
Amazon LightSail
Amazon LightSail
Stacks186
Followers394
Votes9

Amazon LightSail vs Google App Engine: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Amazon LightSail and Google App Engine

  1. Deployment Flexibility: Amazon LightSail allows users to deploy any custom application and configure infrastructural components according to their requirements. On the other hand, Google App Engine is more focused on hosting web applications and provides a platform for running automatic scaling applications. This makes LightSail more suitable for a wider range of use cases, while App Engine is more streamlined towards hosting web applications.

  2. Pricing Model: Amazon LightSail offers a fixed pricing model, where users are billed based on the resources they choose for their instance. This allows for better cost predictability and no surprises in the billing. In contrast, Google App Engine follows a more flexible pricing model based on usage and resource consumption, providing more cost flexibility but potentially resulting in higher bills if resource requirements fluctuate significantly.

  3. Scalability Options: Amazon LightSail provides vertical scalability, allowing users to choose their desired instance size with fixed resources. This makes it easier to scale up or down based on traffic demands. In contrast, Google App Engine offers automatic horizontal scalability, where the platform dynamically scales the instances based on traffic. This makes App Engine more effective in handling rapid traffic spikes and unpredictable workloads.

  4. Infrastructure Management: With Amazon LightSail, users have more control over the infrastructure management, including full root access and the ability to manage server-level configurations. On the other hand, Google App Engine abstracts away the infrastructure management, allowing users to focus solely on the application logic. This provides a simpler and more hands-off approach but limits the control over server configurations.

  5. Service Integrations: Amazon LightSail can easily integrate with other AWS services like Amazon RDS for databases and Amazon S3 for storage. In comparison, Google App Engine provides tight integration with the Google Cloud Platform, including services like Google Cloud SQL for databases and Google Cloud Storage for data storage. The choice of platform depends on users' preference and the specific ecosystem they want to work within.

  6. Development Language Support: Google App Engine offers support for multiple programming languages, including Python, Java, PHP, and Go. On the other hand, Amazon LightSail has broader language support, including popular programming languages like PHP, Ruby, Python, Node.js, and more. This provides users with more flexibility in choosing their preferred development language.

In summary, Amazon LightSail and Google App Engine differ in their deployment flexibility, pricing model, scalability options, infrastructure management, service integrations, and development language support. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Amazon LightSail
Amazon LightSail

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Everything you need to jumpstart your project on AWS—compute, storage, and networking—for a low, predictable price. Launch a virtual private server with just a few clicks.

Zero to sixty: Scale your app automatically without worrying about managing machines.;Supercharged APIs: Supercharge your app with services such as Task Queue, XMPP, and Cloud SQL, all powered by the same infrastructure that powers the Google services you use every day.;You're in control: Manage your application with a simple, web-based dashboard allowing you to customize your app's performance.
-
Statistics
Stacks
10.5K
Stacks
186
Followers
8.1K
Followers
394
Votes
611
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 145
    Easy to deploy
  • 106
    Auto scaling
  • 80
    Good free plan
  • 62
    Easy management
  • 56
    Scalability
Pros
  • 4
    Low cost
  • 4
    Simple Deployment
  • 1
    Simple pricing scheme
Integrations
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Twilio
Twilio
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Google App Engine, Amazon LightSail?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

DigitalOcean

DigitalOcean

We take the complexities out of cloud hosting by offering blazing fast, on-demand SSD cloud servers, straightforward pricing, a simple API, and an easy-to-use control panel.

Amazon EC2

Amazon EC2

It is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Microsoft Azure

Microsoft Azure

Azure is an open and flexible cloud platform that enables you to quickly build, deploy and manage applications across a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters. You can build applications using any language, tool or framework. And you can integrate your public cloud applications with your existing IT environment.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Google Compute Engine

Google Compute Engine

Google Compute Engine is a service that provides virtual machines that run on Google infrastructure. Google Compute Engine offers scale, performance, and value that allows you to easily launch large compute clusters on Google's infrastructure. There are no upfront investments and you can run up to thousands of virtual CPUs on a system that has been designed from the ground up to be fast, and to offer strong consistency of performance.

Linode

Linode

Get a server running in minutes with your choice of Linux distro, resources, and node location.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Scaleway

Scaleway

European cloud computing company proposing a complete & simple public cloud ecosystem, bare-metal servers & private datacenter infrastructures.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase