Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Amazon Aurora

798
733
+ 1
55
Serverless

1.3K
1.2K
+ 1
26
Add tool

Amazon RDS for Aurora vs Serverless: What are the differences?

  1. Scalability: A key difference between Amazon RDS for Aurora and Serverless is the scalability options they offer. With Amazon RDS for Aurora, you can scale your database vertically by increasing the instance size or horizontally by adding replicas. On the other hand, Serverless automatically scales your database based on the workload, allowing for seamless handling of variable workloads without manual intervention.

  2. Pricing: The pricing model for Amazon RDS for Aurora and Serverless differs. Amazon RDS for Aurora is billed based on the instance size and storage usage, while Serverless is billed based on actual consumption per second. This makes Serverless a cost-effective option for applications with unpredictable or irregular traffic patterns.

  3. Capacity: In terms of capacity, there is a difference between Amazon RDS for Aurora and Serverless. Amazon RDS for Aurora allows you to choose the instance size that meets your capacity needs, while Serverless automatically scales the capacity to match the workload, providing on-demand resources as needed.

  4. Startup Time: Another important difference is the startup time of the database. With Amazon RDS for Aurora, the database instance needs to be provisioned and started before it can be accessed. In contrast, Serverless has a faster startup time as it doesn't require any upfront provisioning, allowing for quicker access to the database.

  5. Persistent Connections: Amazon RDS for Aurora supports persistent connections, which can help improve performance and reduce connection overhead. In contrast, Serverless doesn't support persistent connections, which may impact certain applications that rely on long-lived connections.

  6. Performance: When it comes to performance, Amazon RDS for Aurora and Serverless have different characteristics. Amazon RDS for Aurora offers consistent performance for steady workloads, while Serverless can handle bursty workloads efficiently by automatically scaling up and down based on demand.

In summary, Amazon RDS for Aurora and Serverless differ in terms of scalability options, pricing model, capacity management, startup time, support for persistent connections, and performance characteristics.

Decisions about Amazon Aurora and Serverless

When adding a new feature to Checkly rearchitecting some older piece, I tend to pick Heroku for rolling it out. But not always, because sometimes I pick AWS Lambda . The short story:

  • Developer Experience trumps everything.
  • AWS Lambda is cheap. Up to a limit though. This impact not only your wallet.
  • If you need geographic spread, AWS is lonely at the top.
The setup

Recently, I was doing a brainstorm at a startup here in Berlin on the future of their infrastructure. They were ready to move on from their initial, almost 100% Ec2 + Chef based setup. Everything was on the table. But we crossed out a lot quite quickly:

  • Pure, uncut, self hosted Kubernetes — way too much complexity
  • Managed Kubernetes in various flavors — still too much complexity
  • Zeit — Maybe, but no Docker support
  • Elastic Beanstalk — Maybe, bit old but does the job
  • Heroku
  • Lambda

It became clear a mix of PaaS and FaaS was the way to go. What a surprise! That is exactly what I use for Checkly! But when do you pick which model?

I chopped that question up into the following categories:

  • Developer Experience / DX 🤓
  • Ops Experience / OX 🐂 (?)
  • Cost 💵
  • Lock in 🔐

Read the full post linked below for all details

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Amazon Aurora
Pros of Serverless
  • 14
    MySQL compatibility
  • 12
    Better performance
  • 10
    Easy read scalability
  • 9
    Speed
  • 7
    Low latency read replica
  • 2
    High IOPS cost
  • 1
    Good cost performance
  • 14
    API integration
  • 7
    Supports cloud functions for Google, Azure, and IBM
  • 3
    Lower cost
  • 1
    Auto scale
  • 1
    Openwhisk

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Amazon Aurora
Cons of Serverless
  • 2
    Vendor locking
  • 1
    Rigid schema
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Amazon Aurora?

    Amazon Aurora is a MySQL-compatible, relational database engine that combines the speed and availability of high-end commercial databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases. Amazon Aurora provides up to five times better performance than MySQL at a price point one tenth that of a commercial database while delivering similar performance and availability.

    What is Serverless?

    Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Amazon Aurora?
    What companies use Serverless?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Amazon Aurora or Serverless.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Amazon Aurora?
    What tools integrate with Serverless?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    DockerAmazon EC2Scala+8
    6
    2709
    GitHubPythonNode.js+47
    54
    72304
    What are some alternatives to Amazon Aurora and Serverless?
    Amazon RDS
    Amazon RDS gives you access to the capabilities of a familiar MySQL, Oracle or Microsoft SQL Server database engine. This means that the code, applications, and tools you already use today with your existing databases can be used with Amazon RDS. Amazon RDS automatically patches the database software and backs up your database, storing the backups for a user-defined retention period and enabling point-in-time recovery. You benefit from the flexibility of being able to scale the compute resources or storage capacity associated with your Database Instance (DB Instance) via a single API call.
    Google Cloud SQL
    Run the same relational databases you know with their rich extension collections, configuration flags and developer ecosystem, but without the hassle of self management.
    Azure SQL Database
    It is the intelligent, scalable, cloud database service that provides the broadest SQL Server engine compatibility and up to a 212% return on investment. It is a database service that can quickly and efficiently scale to meet demand, is automatically highly available, and supports a variety of third party software.
    Cloud DB for Mysql
    It is a fully managed cloud cache service that enables you to easily configure a MySQL database with a few settings and clicks and operate it reliably with NAVER's optimization settings, and that automatically recovers from failures.
    PlanetScaleDB
    It is a fully managed cloud native database-as-a-service built on Vitess and Kubernetes. A MySQL compatible highly scalable database. Effortlessly deploy, manage, and monitor your databases in multiple regions and across cloud providers.
    See all alternatives