StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Dns Management
  5. Amazon Route 53 vs Google Cloud DNS

Amazon Route 53 vs Google Cloud DNS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon Route 53
Amazon Route 53
Stacks14.5K
Followers9.4K
Votes678
Google Cloud DNS
Google Cloud DNS
Stacks2.4K
Followers572
Votes44

Amazon Route 53 vs Google Cloud DNS: What are the differences?

Amazon Route 53 and Google Cloud DNS are domain name system (DNS) services. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Scalability: Amazon Route 53 is known for its scalability, allowing users to easily handle large influxes of traffic. It provides a global network of DNS servers that can automatically scale to handle high query volumes, ensuring reliable performance for websites and applications. On the other hand, Google Cloud DNS also offers scalability, but it may not be as robust as Route 53 when handling extremely high query volumes.

  2. Integration with Other Services: Route 53 integrates seamlessly with other Amazon Web Services (AWS) offerings, such as Amazon Elastic Load Balancer, Amazon CloudFront CDN, and Amazon S3 storage. This tight integration allows organizations to build comprehensive solutions using AWS services. In comparison, Google Cloud DNS integrates well with other Google Cloud Platform (GCP) services, making it an attractive option for organizations already utilizing GCP.

  3. Pricing Structure: Route 53 has a complex pricing structure that involves different pricing tiers based on the number of queries and hosted zones. It also charges for additional features like traffic management and health checks. Google Cloud DNS, on the other hand, follows a simpler pricing model that includes a fixed price per million queries and a flat rate for DNS zones. This straightforward pricing structure can be advantageous for organizations with predictable and regular DNS query traffic.

  4. DNSSEC Support: DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) is a technology that adds an extra layer of security to DNS by providing data integrity and authentication. While both Route 53 and Google Cloud DNS support DNSSEC, Route 53 offers greater control and ease of implementation with its integration into AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) and AWS Certificate Manager.

  5. Management Interface: Route 53 provides a user-friendly management console that offers a rich set of features and functionalities. It allows users to easily configure DNS records, set up health checks, and manage traffic routing policies. On the other hand, Google Cloud DNS has a simpler management interface that may be more suitable for users who prefer a minimalist approach to DNS management.

  6. Global DNS Infrastructure: Amazon Route 53 is built on AWS's global infrastructure, which spans across multiple regions and availability zones. This global footprint ensures low latency and high availability for DNS resolution worldwide. In comparison, Google Cloud DNS also has a global presence but may not be as extensive as Route 53, making it a better choice for organizations with specific regional needs.

In summary, Amazon Route 53 offers exceptional scalability, tight integration with AWS services, and a robust management interface. It excels in handling high traffic volumes and complex architectures. On the other hand, Google Cloud DNS provides simplicity in pricing and management, making it a suitable choice for organizations already utilizing the Google Cloud Platform.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon Route 53, Google Cloud DNS

Eric
Eric

Service Engineer at Zix Corporation

Aug 5, 2020

Needs adviceonAmazon Route 53Amazon Route 53

We are looking for advice / best-practices / caveats about migrating off BIND on to Unbound https://nlnetlabs.nl/projects/unbound/about/ for internal & external (customer-facing) DNS. Is unbound suitable for this, or is it only recommended for caching? How easy or difficult is it to move 10000's of existing BIND DNS zone entries? We already use Amazon Route 53 for our AWS instances and Cloud DNS for our GCP ones, but would like to maintain internal DNS for cost, control, and latency reasons.

58.6k views58.6k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon Route 53
Amazon Route 53
Google Cloud DNS
Google Cloud DNS

Amazon Route 53 is designed to give developers and businesses an extremely reliable and cost effective way to route end users to Internet applications by translating human readable names like www.example.com into the numeric IP addresses like 192.0.2.1 that computers use to connect to each other. Route 53 effectively connects user requests to infrastructure running in Amazon Web Services (AWS) – such as an Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) instance, an Amazon Elastic Load Balancer, or an Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) bucket – and can also be used to route users to infrastructure outside of AWS.

Use Google's infrastructure for production quality, high volume DNS serving. Your users will have reliable, low-latency access to Google's infrastructure from anywhere in the world using our network of Anycast name servers.

Highly Available and Reliable – Route 53 is built using AWS’s highly available and reliable infrastructure. The distributed nature of our DNS servers helps ensure a consistent ability to route your end users to your application. Route 53 is designed to provide the level of dependability required by important applications. Amazon Route 53 is backed by the Amazon Route 53 Service Level Agreement.;Scalable – Route 53 is designed to automatically scale to handle very large query volumes without any intervention from you.;Designed for use with other Amazon Web Services – Route 53 is designed to work well with other AWS features and offerings. You can use Route 53 to map domain names to your Amazon EC2 instances, Amazon S3 buckets, Amazon CloudFront distributions, and other AWS resources. By using the AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) service with Route 53, you get fine grained control over who can update your DNS data. You can use Route 53 to map your zone apex (example.com versus www.example.com) to your Elastic Load Balancing instance or Amazon S3 website bucket using a feature called Alias record.;Simple – With self-service sign-up, Route 53 can start to answer your DNS queries within minutes. You can configure your DNS settings with the AWS Management Console or our easy-to-use API. You can also programmatically integrate the Route 53 API into your overall web application. For instance, you can use Route 53’s API to create a new DNS record whenever you create a new EC2 instance.;Fast – Using a global anycast network of DNS servers around the world, Route 53 is designed to automatically route your users to the optimal location depending on network conditions. As a result, the service offers low query latency for your end users, as well as low update latency for your DNS record management needs.;Cost-Effective – Route 53 passes on the benefits of AWS’s scale to you. You pay only for managing domains through the service and the number of queries that the service answers for each of your domains, at a low cost and without minimum usage commitments or any up-front fees.;Secure – By integrating Route 53 with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), you can grant unique credentials and manage permissions for every user within your AWS account and specify who has access to which parts of the Route 53 service.;Flexible – Route 53 offers Weighted Round-Robin (WRR), also known as DNS load balancing. This lets you assign weights to your DNS records that specify what portion of your traffic is routed to various endpoints.
High performance, reliable DNS service;Easy to use, customizable to your needs;Manage records for all your services
Statistics
Stacks
14.5K
Stacks
2.4K
Followers
9.4K
Followers
572
Votes
678
Votes
44
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 185
    High-availability
  • 148
    Simple
  • 103
    Backed by amazon
  • 76
    Fast
  • 54
    Auhtoritive dns servers are spread over different tlds
Cons
  • 2
    SLOW
  • 2
    Geo-based routing only works with AWS zones
  • 1
    Restrictive rate limit
Pros
  • 9
    Backed by Google
  • 7
    High-availability
  • 6
    Reliable
  • 5
    Anycast DNS servers
  • 5
    High volume
Cons
  • 4
    Lack of privacy
  • 2
    Backed by Google

What are some alternatives to Amazon Route 53, Google Cloud DNS?

DNSimple

DNSimple

DNSimple provides the tools you need to manage your domains. We offer both a carefully crafted web interface for managing your domains and DNS records, as well as an HTTP API with various code libraries and tools. Buy, connect, operate!

Dyn

Dyn

An all-in-one Managed DNS service for your registered domain names. Dyn DNS is the perfect solution for your domain name’s DNS needs, whether it is for personal or business use. It gives you complete control over your DNS zone and its associated DNS records, complete with a simple DNS management web interface.

DNS Made Easy

DNS Made Easy

DNS Made Easy is a subsidiary of Tiggee LLC, and is a world leader in providing global IP Anycast enterprise DNS services. DNS Made Easy is currently ranked the fastest provider for 8 consecutive months and the most reliable provider.

NS1

NS1

NS1’s intelligent DNS & traffic management platform, with its data driven architecture and unique Filter Chain routing engine, is purpose-built for the most demanding, mission-critical applications on the Internet.

CoreDNS

CoreDNS

CoreDNS is a DNS server. It is written in Go. It can be used in a multitude of environments because of its flexibility

nextdns

nextdns

Cloud-based private DNS service that gives you full control over what is allowed and what is blocked on the Internet. Think of it as a combination of Cloudflare DNS and Pi-hole®.

InboxKit

InboxKit

InboxKit automates your entire cold email infrastructure. Buy domains, provision Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 mailboxes, configure DNS, and export to 16+ sequencers — all from one dashboard. Scale from 10 to 10,000 mailboxes without the manual setup headache.

Modern DDoS Protection & Edge Security Platform

Modern DDoS Protection & Edge Security Platform

Protect and accelerate your apps with Trafficmind’s global edge — DDoS defense, WAF, API security, CDN/DNS, 99.99% uptime and 24/7 expert team.

BIND9

BIND9

It is a versatile name server software. It has evolved to be a very flexible, full-featured DNS system. Whatever your application is, it probably has the required features.

PowerDNS

PowerDNS

It features a large number of different backends ranging from simple BIND style zonefiles to relational databases and load balancing/failover algorithms. A DNS recursor is provided as a separate program.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope