Amazon SES vs Postfix

Overview

Amazon SES

Stacks9.9K

Followers6.0K

Votes328

Postfix

Stacks135

Followers127

Votes0

Amazon SES vs Postfix: What are the differences?

Cost: Amazon SES offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you only pay for the emails you send. Postfix, on the other hand, is an open-source mail transfer agent, which means it is free to use. This cost difference can be significant, especially for organizations that send a large volume of emails.
Ease of Use: Amazon SES provides a user-friendly interface and offers comprehensive documentation, making it easier for users to set up and configure their email sending. Postfix, being a command-line tool, requires more technical knowledge and configuration, making it less user-friendly for beginners.
Email Deliverability Management: Amazon SES has built-in features for managing and monitoring email deliverability, providing detailed insights into email metrics, such as bounce rates, complaints, and rejected emails. Postfix, being a mail transfer agent, does not have these built-in deliverability management features and requires additional third-party tools or manual monitoring.
Sender Reputation Management: Amazon SES helps manage sender reputation by employing various measures, such as bounce handling, complaint feedback loops, and content filtering. Postfix, being a mail transfer agent, does not have these built-in reputation management features and requires additional configuration and setup to effectively manage sender reputation.
Scalability: Amazon SES is designed to handle high email volume and can easily scale to accommodate increased sending needs. Postfix, being a self-hosted mail transfer agent, may require additional hardware or configuration changes to handle high email volume and may have limitations based on the hardware and resources available.
API Integration: Amazon SES offers a powerful API that allows developers to integrate email sending capabilities directly into their applications. Postfix, being a command-line tool, does not come with a built-in API, requiring developers to build custom solutions for integrating email sending capabilities into their applications.

In Summary, Amazon SES offers a user-friendly interface, built-in email deliverability and reputation management, scalability, and API integration, but comes with a cost, while Postfix is free to use but requires more technical knowledge and additional configuration for email deliverability and reputation management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Amazon SES, Postfix

RichardsFood

Sep 19, 2019

Needs advice

The problem I have is we are using mailchimp and not happy. We want to switch to mailster and are curious the easiest and best way to send emails with mailster.

The most important factors for me are ease of use, tracking.

I have only had experience with mailchimp, constant concact and streamsend. So ease of use is important.

30k views30k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon SES	Postfix
Amazon SES eliminates the complexity and expense of building an in-house email solution or licensing, installing, and operating a third-party email service. The service integrates with other AWS services, making it easy to send emails from applications being hosted on services such as Amazon EC2.	It is a free and open-source mail transfer agent that routes and delivers electronic mail. It is Wietse Venema's mail server that started life at IBM research as an alternative to the widely-used Sendmail program. Now at Google, Wietse continues to support it.
Simple – Amazon SES eliminates the complexity of licensing, installing, and operating a third-party service, or building and maintaining an internally hosted email solution. Sending email through Amazon SES is as simple as using SMTP or calling an API, and Amazon SES makes it easy for you to monitor your sending activity and deliverability statistics.;Inexpensive – There are no up-front fees or fixed expenses with Amazon SES, and you benefit from the efficiencies of Amazon’s scale. Your only costs are low charges for the number of emails sent and data transfer fees.;Reliable – Amazon SES runs within Amazon’s proven network infrastructure and datacenters. All outgoing email messages are stored redundantly across multiple servers and datacenters, providing high availability and data durability.;Scalable – Amazon SES is based on the scalable technology used by Amazon web sites around the world to send billions of messages a year.;Designed for use with other Amazon Web Services – You can track your bounces and complaints in Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS), and you can set up Easy DKIM or verify any domain you administer via Amazon Route 53 with a few clicks of your mouse. There is also a free usage tier for emails originating from Amazon EC2 and AWS Elastic Beanstalk.	-
Statistics
Stacks 9.9K	Stacks 135
Followers 6.0K	Followers 127
Votes 328	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 102 Reliable 97 Cheap 57 Integrates with other aws services 52 Easy setup 18 Trackable	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Amazon SES, Postfix?

Mandrill

Mandrill is a new way for apps to send transactional email. It runs on the delivery infrastructure that powers MailChimp.

Twilio SendGrid

Twilio SendGrid's cloud-based email infrastructure relieves businesses of the cost and complexity of maintaining custom email systems. Twilio SendGrid provides reliable delivery, scalability & real-time analytics along with flexible API's.

Mailgun

Mailgun is a set of powerful APIs that allow you to send, receive, track and store email effortlessly.

sendwithus

Send email from your app with a simple API call, Sendwithus manages the rest. Templates, testing, data management, segments, and analytics are all accessible through a friendly dashboard.

Postmark

Postmark removes the headaches of delivering and parsing email for webapps with minimal setup time and zero maintenance.

Mailjet

Mailjet is a real-time Cloud Emailing platform: scalable, agile and flexible. Our unique algorithm boosts your deliverability and our platform provides in-depth insight so you can optimize more than ever.

SparkPost

SparkPost is the world’s #1 email delivery provider. We empower companies with actionable, real-time data to send relevant email to their customers which increases engagement and both top and bottom line revenue.

Mailtrap

We offer one platform that covers all email-related needs in one place: testing, sending, and in-depth tracking to control how email infrastructure works and performs.

Apostle.io

Transactional emails are the forgotten step child of internet marketers. Apostle.io empowers marketers to manage transactional emails themselves, as they would their list based campaigns. Preview, Update, Analyse and Test your transactional email all in one place.

Nodemailer

It is a single module with zero dependencies – code is easily auditable. The email delivery is Secure using TLS/STARTTLS. You can use HTML content, as well as plain text alternative.

Related Comparisons

Amazon SES vs Postfix: What are the differences?

Cost: Amazon SES offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you only pay for the emails you send. Postfix, on the other hand, is an open-source mail transfer agent, which means it is free to use. This cost difference can be significant, especially for organizations that send a large volume of emails.
Ease of Use: Amazon SES provides a user-friendly interface and offers comprehensive documentation, making it easier for users to set up and configure their email sending. Postfix, being a command-line tool, requires more technical knowledge and configuration, making it less user-friendly for beginners.
Email Deliverability Management: Amazon SES has built-in features for managing and monitoring email deliverability, providing detailed insights into email metrics, such as bounce rates, complaints, and rejected emails. Postfix, being a mail transfer agent, does not have these built-in deliverability management features and requires additional third-party tools or manual monitoring.
Sender Reputation Management: Amazon SES helps manage sender reputation by employing various measures, such as bounce handling, complaint feedback loops, and content filtering. Postfix, being a mail transfer agent, does not have these built-in reputation management features and requires additional configuration and setup to effectively manage sender reputation.
Scalability: Amazon SES is designed to handle high email volume and can easily scale to accommodate increased sending needs. Postfix, being a self-hosted mail transfer agent, may require additional hardware or configuration changes to handle high email volume and may have limitations based on the hardware and resources available.
API Integration: Amazon SES offers a powerful API that allows developers to integrate email sending capabilities directly into their applications. Postfix, being a command-line tool, does not come with a built-in API, requiring developers to build custom solutions for integrating email sending capabilities into their applications.

Amazon SES vs Postfix

Overview