Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Ant Design vs Material-UI: What are the differences?
Ant Design and Material-UI are both popular UI component libraries. They provide a rich set of pre-designed UI components. The key differences between Ant Design and Material-UI are:
Design Philosophy: Ant Design follows a more traditional and business-oriented design philosophy. It offers a comprehensive set of components with a focus on productivity and enterprise-level applications. Material-UI, on the other hand, is inspired by Google's Material Design principles, which emphasize clean and modern aesthetics with a focus on visual consistency and usability.
Component Styles: Ant Design components exhibit a formal and conservative style, characterized by traditional layouts and color schemes that are well-suited for corporate and professional applications. In contrast, Material-UI components embrace a lively and dynamic style, showcasing bold colors, shadows, and motion effects that align with the vibrant aesthetics outlined in the Material Design guidelines.
Component Selection: Ant Design provides a broader range of UI components, including complex components specific to enterprise applications such as data tables, form layouts, and organization charts. Material-UI offers a comprehensive set of components as well but focuses more on core UI elements like buttons, forms, navigation, and layout grids.
Theming and Customization: Ant Design provides a comprehensive theming system that enables easy customization of colors, typography, and component styles. On the other hand, Material-UI focuses on adhering to Material Design guidelines, making it easier to achieve a consistent and unified appearance throughout the application while still offering theming options.
Community and Ecosystem: Material-UI has a larger and more active community, with a wide range of third-party resources, tutorials, and community-driven projects available. Ant Design also has a growing community but may have a more focused presence within certain regions or industries.
Integration with Frameworks: Material-UI has strong integration with React and provides React-specific components and utilities. It aligns well with the React ecosystem and leverages popular state management libraries. Ant Design also supports React but is not limited to it. It offers support for other frameworks such as Angular and Vue.js, providing flexibility for developers using different frameworks.
In summary, Ant Design and Material-UI are feature-rich UI component libraries with distinct design philosophies. Ant Design focuses on productivity and enterprise applications, offering a broad range of components, while Material-UI follows the Material Design guidelines, providing a visually appealing and modern design aesthetic.
Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.
https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085
Pros of Ant Design
- Lots of components48
- Polished and enterprisey look and feel33
- TypeScript21
- Easy to integrate21
- Es6 support18
- Typescript support17
- Beautiful and solid17
- Beautifully Animated Components16
- Quick Release rhythm15
- Great documentation14
- Easy to customize Forms2
- Opensource and free of cost2
Pros of Material-UI
- React141
- Material Design82
- Ui components60
- CSS framework30
- Component26
- Looks great15
- Responsive13
- Good documentation12
- LESS9
- Ui component8
- Open source7
- Flexible6
- Code examples6
- JSS5
- Supports old browsers out of the box3
- Interface3
- Angular3
- Very accessible3
- Fun3
- Typescript support2
- # of components2
- Designed for Server Side Rendering2
- Support for multiple styling systems1
- Accessibility1
- Easy to work with1
- Css1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Ant Design
- Less24
- Large File Size10
- Poor accessibility support4
- Dangerous to use as a base in component libraries3
Cons of Material-UI
- Hard to learn. Bad documentation36
- Hard to customize29
- Hard to understand Docs22
- Bad performance9
- Extra library needed for date/time pickers7
- For editable table component need to use material-table7
- Typescript Support2
- # of components1