Material-UI vs Ant Design | What are the differences?

Overview

Material-UI

Stacks2.3K

Followers3.7K

Votes445

Ant Design

Stacks1.1K

Followers1.7K

Votes224

GitHub Stars96.5K

Forks53.9K

Ant Design vs Material-UI: What are the differences?

Ant Design and Material-UI are both popular UI component libraries. They provide a rich set of pre-designed UI components. The key differences between Ant Design and Material-UI are:

Design Philosophy: Ant Design follows a more traditional and business-oriented design philosophy. It offers a comprehensive set of components with a focus on productivity and enterprise-level applications. Material-UI, on the other hand, is inspired by Google's Material Design principles, which emphasize clean and modern aesthetics with a focus on visual consistency and usability.
Component Styles: Ant Design components exhibit a formal and conservative style, characterized by traditional layouts and color schemes that are well-suited for corporate and professional applications. In contrast, Material-UI components embrace a lively and dynamic style, showcasing bold colors, shadows, and motion effects that align with the vibrant aesthetics outlined in the Material Design guidelines.
Component Selection: Ant Design provides a broader range of UI components, including complex components specific to enterprise applications such as data tables, form layouts, and organization charts. Material-UI offers a comprehensive set of components as well but focuses more on core UI elements like buttons, forms, navigation, and layout grids.
Theming and Customization: Ant Design provides a comprehensive theming system that enables easy customization of colors, typography, and component styles. On the other hand, Material-UI focuses on adhering to Material Design guidelines, making it easier to achieve a consistent and unified appearance throughout the application while still offering theming options.
Community and Ecosystem: Material-UI has a larger and more active community, with a wide range of third-party resources, tutorials, and community-driven projects available. Ant Design also has a growing community but may have a more focused presence within certain regions or industries.
Integration with Frameworks: Material-UI has strong integration with React and provides React-specific components and utilities. It aligns well with the React ecosystem and leverages popular state management libraries. Ant Design also supports React but is not limited to it. It offers support for other frameworks such as Angular and Vue.js, providing flexibility for developers using different frameworks.

In summary, Ant Design and Material-UI are feature-rich UI component libraries with distinct design philosophies. Ant Design focuses on productivity and enterprise applications, offering a broad range of components, while Material-UI follows the Material Design guidelines, providing a visually appealing and modern design aesthetic.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

SmartClient Framework by Isomorphic Software Frameworks

SmartClient Framework by Isomorphic Software

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

1

Advice on Material-UI, Ant Design

Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

766k views766k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI	Ant Design
Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.	An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.
Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming	Cases; Principles; Proximity; Alignment; Contrast; Repetition; Make it Direct; Stay on the Page; Keep it Lightweight; Provide an Invitation; Use Transition; React Immediately; Colors; Icons; Font; Copywriting.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 96.5K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 53.9K
Stacks 2.3K	Stacks 1.1K
Followers 3.7K	Followers 1.7K
Votes 445	Votes 224
Pros & Cons
Pros 141 React 82 Material Design 60 Ui components 30 CSS framework 26 Component Cons 36 Hard to learn. Bad documentation 29 Hard to customize 22 Hard to understand Docs 9 Bad performance 7 For editable table component need to use material-table	Pros 48 Lots of components 33 Polished and enterprisey look and feel 21 TypeScript 21 Easy to integrate 18 Es6 support Cons 24 Less 10 Large File Size 4 Poor accessibility support 3 Dangerous to use as a base in component libraries
Integrations
React Emotion Next.js styled-components Node.js	React jQuery UI Bootstrap VueStrap

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, Ant Design?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.