Apache CloudStack vs Kong

Overview

Apache CloudStack

Stacks66

Followers250

Votes95

GitHub Stars2.7K

Forks1.2K

Kong

Stacks671

Followers1.5K

Votes139

GitHub Stars42.1K

Forks5.0K

Apache CloudStack vs Kong: What are the differences?

Apache CloudStack: Open Source Cloud Computing. Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform; Kong: Open Source Microservice & API Management Layer. Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality and services beyond the core platform.

Apache CloudStack belongs to "Open Source Cloud" category of the tech stack, while Kong can be primarily classified under "Microservices Tools".

Some of the features offered by Apache CloudStack are:

Works with hosts running XenServer/XCP, KVM, Hyper-V, and/or VMware ESXi with vSphere
Provides a friendly Web-based UI for managing the cloud
Provides a native API

On the other hand, Kong provides the following key features:

Logging: Log requests and responses to your system over TCP, UDP or to disk
OAuth2.0: Add easily an OAuth2.0 authentication to your APIs
Monitoring: Live monitoring provides key load and performance server metrics

"Apache CloudStack works" is the primary reason why developers consider Apache CloudStack over the competitors, whereas "Easy to maintain" was stated as the key factor in picking Kong.

Apache CloudStack and Kong are both open source tools. Kong with 22.4K GitHub stars and 2.75K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Apache CloudStack with 754 GitHub stars and 714 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Apache CloudStack, Kong

Prateek

Mar 14, 2020

Decided

Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn-keyIstio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn key solution with Rancher whereas Kong completely lacks here. Traffic distribution in Istio can be done via canary, a/b, shadowing, HTTP headers, ACL, whitelist whereas in Kong it's limited to canary, ACL, blue-green, proxy caching. Istio has amazing community support which is visible via Github stars or releases when comparing both.

322k views322k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache CloudStack	Kong
CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.	Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality and services beyond the core platform.
Works with hosts running KVM, XenServer/XCP-ng, VMware ESXi with vSphere and HyperV; Provides a friendly Web-based UI for managing the cloud; Provides a native API; Manages storage for instances running on the hypervisors (primary storage) as well as templates, snapshots, and ISO images (secondary storage); Orchestrates network services from the data link layer (L2) to some application layer (L7) services, such as DHCP, NAT, firewall, VPN, and so on; Accounting of network, compute, and storage resources; Multi-tenancy/account separation; User management; Supports Kubernetes, Terraform, Ansible	Logging: Log requests and responses to your system over TCP, UDP or to disk; OAuth2.0: Add easily an OAuth2.0 authentication to your APIs; Monitoring: Live monitoring provides key load and performance server metrics; IP-restriction: Whitelist or blacklist IPs that can make requests; Authentication: Manage consumer credentials query string and header tokens; Rate-limiting: Block and throttle requests based on IP or authentication; Transformations: Add, remove or manipulate HTTP params and headers on-the-fly; CORS: Enable cross-origin requests to your APIs that would otherwise be blocked; Anything: Need custom functionality? Extend Kong with your own Lua plugins;
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.7K	GitHub Stars 42.1K
GitHub Forks 1.2K	GitHub Forks 5.0K
Stacks 66	Stacks 671
Followers 250	Followers 1.5K
Votes 95	Votes 139
Pros & Cons
Pros 15 Apache CloudStack works 13 Multi hypervisor 10 Easy setup 9 Real open source software 9 Open architecture	Pros 37 Easy to maintain 32 Easy to install 26 Flexible 21 Great performance 7 Api blueprint
Integrations
No integrations available	Cassandra Docker Prometheus Kubernetes PostgreSQL NGINX Vagrant

What are some alternatives to Apache CloudStack, Kong?

OpenStack

OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.

Amazon API Gateway

Amazon API Gateway handles all the tasks involved in accepting and processing up to hundreds of thousands of concurrent API calls, including traffic management, authorization and access control, monitoring, and API version management.

Tyk Cloud

Tyk is a leading Open Source API Gateway and Management Platform, featuring an API gateway, analytics, developer portal and dashboard. We power billions of transactions for thousands of innovative organisations.

Moesif

Build a winning API platform with instant, meaningful visibility into API usage and customer adoption

VirtKick

Software as a service platform for hosting providers.

Ambassador

Map services to arbitrary URLs in a single, declarative YAML file. Configure routes with CORS support, circuit breakers, timeouts, and more. Replace your Kubernetes ingress controller. Route gRPC, WebSockets, or HTTP.

Gattera

Are you a non-traditional business and you're looking for a real partner that you can process your payments? We are here for you!

Azure API Management

Today's innovative enterprises are adopting API architectures to accelerate growth. Streamline your work across hybrid and multi-cloud environments with a single place for managing all your APIs.

OpenNebula

It provides a simple but feature-rich and flexible solution for the comprehensive management of virtualized data centers to enable on-premise enterprise clouds in existing infrastructures. It can be primarily used as a virtualization tool to manage your virtual infrastructure in the data-center or cluster, which is usually referred as Private Cloud. It supports Hybrid Cloud to combine local infrastructure with public cloud-based infrastructure, enabling highly scalable hosting environments.

API Umbrella

API Umbrella is a proxy that sits in front of your APIs. It can seamlessly add common functionality like api keys, rate limiting, and analytics to any API.

Related Comparisons

Some of the features offered by Apache CloudStack are:

Works with hosts running XenServer/XCP, KVM, Hyper-V, and/or VMware ESXi with vSphere
Provides a friendly Web-based UI for managing the cloud
Provides a native API

On the other hand, Kong provides the following key features:

Logging: Log requests and responses to your system over TCP, UDP or to disk
OAuth2.0: Add easily an OAuth2.0 authentication to your APIs
Monitoring: Live monitoring provides key load and performance server metrics

"Apache CloudStack works" is the primary reason why developers consider Apache CloudStack over the competitors, whereas "Easy to maintain" was stated as the key factor in picking Kong.

Apache CloudStack vs Kong