StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Apache Kudu vs HBase

Apache Kudu vs HBase

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

HBase
HBase
Stacks511
Followers498
Votes15
GitHub Stars5.5K
Forks3.4K
Apache Kudu
Apache Kudu
Stacks71
Followers259
Votes10
GitHub Stars828
Forks282

Apache Kudu vs HBase: What are the differences?

Introduction: Apache Kudu and HBase are two popular distributed storage systems used for real-time big data processing.

1. **Data Storage**: Apache Kudu stores data in columns, similar to a traditional RDBMS, allowing for fast analytical queries and efficient storage utilization. On the other hand, HBase stores data in rows, making it suitable for real-time read and write operations.

2. **Consistency Model**: Apache Kudu offers strong consistency guarantees, ensuring that all clients see the same data at any given time. In contrast, HBase provides eventual consistency, which may result in temporary inconsistencies across data replicas.

3. **Data Update Support**: Apache Kudu supports in-place updates and deletes, allowing for efficient updates without the need to rewrite entire rows of data. HBase, however, is optimized for sequential write operations and does not offer native support for in-place updates.

4. **Scan Performance**: Apache Kudu offers superior scan performance due to its columnar storage format and ability to push down predicates to minimize data access. HBase, on the other hand, may experience performance issues with large scans due to its row-oriented storage model.

5. **Use Cases**: Apache Kudu is well-suited for use cases requiring real-time analytics and interactive querying, thanks to its low latency and high throughput capabilities. HBase, on the other hand, is commonly used for scalable, distributed storage of sparse data sets with low-latency access requirements.

6. **Integration with Ecosystem Tools**: Apache Kudu seamlessly integrates with Apache Impala for real-time analytics and Apache Spark for data processing, making it suitable for modern data pipelines. HBase, on the other hand, is often integrated with Apache Hadoop ecosystem tools such as Apache Hive and Apache Pig for batch processing tasks.

In Summary, Apache Kudu and HBase differ in their data storage models, consistency guarantees, support for updates, performance characteristics, use cases, and integration with ecosystem tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

HBase
HBase
Apache Kudu
Apache Kudu

Apache HBase is an open-source, distributed, versioned, column-oriented store modeled after Google' Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data by Chang et al. Just as Bigtable leverages the distributed data storage provided by the Google File System, HBase provides Bigtable-like capabilities on top of Apache Hadoop.

A new addition to the open source Apache Hadoop ecosystem, Kudu completes Hadoop's storage layer to enable fast analytics on fast data.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.5K
GitHub Stars
828
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
282
Stacks
511
Stacks
71
Followers
498
Followers
259
Votes
15
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Performance
  • 5
    OLTP
  • 1
    Fast Point Queries
Pros
  • 10
    Realtime Analytics
Cons
  • 1
    Restart time
Integrations
No integrations available
Hadoop
Hadoop

What are some alternatives to HBase, Apache Kudu?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase