Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Disque

11
25
+ 1
0
Apache RocketMQ

48
200
+ 1
8
Add tool

Apache RocketMQ vs Disque: What are the differences?

  1. Message Broker Type: Apache RocketMQ is a distributed message broker system whereas Disque is a distributed message broker and job queue system.
  2. Persistence Mechanism: Apache RocketMQ supports persistent and non-persistent message delivery while Disque only supports persistent message storage.
  3. Message Durability: RocketMQ guarantees message delivery in the event of system failures, but Disque doesn't provide such a guarantee for every message.
  4. Message Ordering: RocketMQ ensures strict message ordering within the same message queue, ensuring sequential processing. Disque may not maintain strict ordering for messages.
  5. Messaging Protocols: Apache RocketMQ supports multiple messaging protocols like AMQP, STOMP, MQTT, while Disque focuses primarily on supporting the Redis protocol for message exchange.
  6. Scalability: RocketMQ allows for horizontal scalability by adding more nodes in a cluster, providing higher throughput and fault tolerance. Disque has limited scalability compared to RocketMQ due to its design approach.

In Summary, Apache RocketMQ and Disque differ in terms of message broker type, persistence mechanism, message durability, message ordering, supported messaging protocols, and scalability.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Disque
Pros of Apache RocketMQ
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 2
      Million-level message accumulation capacity in a single
    • 2
      Support tracing message and transactional message
    • 1
      BigData Friendly
    • 1
      High throughput messaging
    • 1
      Feature-rich administrative dashboard for configuration
    • 1
      Low latency

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Disque?

    Disque is an ongoing experiment to build a distributed, in-memory, message broker. Its goal is to capture the essence of the "Redis as a jobs queue" use case, which is usually implemented using blocking list operations, and move it into an ad-hoc, self-contained, scalable, and fault tolerant design, with simple to understand properties and guarantees, but still resembling Redis in terms of simplicity, performance, and implementation as a C non-blocking networked server.

    What is Apache RocketMQ?

    Apache RocketMQ is a distributed messaging and streaming platform with low latency, high performance and reliability, trillion-level capacity and flexible scalability.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Disque?
    What companies use Apache RocketMQ?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Disque?
    What tools integrate with Apache RocketMQ?
      No integrations found
      What are some alternatives to Disque and Apache RocketMQ?
      RabbitMQ
      RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
      Kafka
      Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
      MySQL
      The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
      PostgreSQL
      PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.
      MongoDB
      MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
      See all alternatives