IronMQ vs Apache RocketMQ

Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

IronMQ
IronMQ

29
33
+ 1
34
Apache RocketMQ
Apache RocketMQ

9
16
+ 1
4
Add tool

IronMQ vs Apache RocketMQ: What are the differences?

IronMQ: Message Queue for any deployment. An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance; Apache RocketMQ: Open source distributed messaging and streaming data platform. Apache RocketMQ is a distributed messaging and streaming platform with low latency, high performance and reliability, trillion-level capacity and flexible scalability.

IronMQ and Apache RocketMQ can be categorized as "Message Queue" tools.

Apache RocketMQ is an open source tool with 8.25K GitHub stars and 4.23K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Apache RocketMQ's open source repository on GitHub.

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is IronMQ?

An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.

What is Apache RocketMQ?

Apache RocketMQ is a distributed messaging and streaming platform with low latency, high performance and reliability, trillion-level capacity and flexible scalability.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose IronMQ?
Why do developers choose Apache RocketMQ?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    Be the first to leave a con
    What companies use IronMQ?
    What companies use Apache RocketMQ?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with IronMQ?
    What tools integrate with Apache RocketMQ?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to IronMQ and Apache RocketMQ?
    RabbitMQ
    RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
    Kafka
    Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
    Amazon SQS
    Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.
    Celery
    Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.
    ActiveMQ
    Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.
    See all alternatives
    Decisions about IronMQ and Apache RocketMQ
    No stack decisions found
    Interest over time
    Reviews of IronMQ and Apache RocketMQ
    Avatar of umuro
    Co-Founder at Publitory
    Review ofIronMQIronMQ

    I deploy to Heroku. However, my applications require full linux applications that cannot be deployed to Heroku. I deploy them to Rackspace.

    Then Heroku and Rackspace communicate over IronMQ. Problem solved.

    How developers use IronMQ and Apache RocketMQ
    Avatar of True Fiction Production AB
    True Fiction Production AB uses IronMQIronMQ

    Process queues

    How much does IronMQ cost?
    How much does Apache RocketMQ cost?
    Pricing unavailable
    News about Apache RocketMQ
    More news