Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Apigee

234
686
+ 1
30
Zuul

252
379
+ 1
8
Add tool

Apigee vs Zuul: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apigee and Zuul are both popular API gateway solutions used to manage and secure APIs. While both Apigee and Zuul offer similar functionalities, there are several key differences between them that set them apart.

  1. Runtime Performance: Apigee is known for its scalability and high performance. It utilizes distributed caching and horizontal scaling techniques to handle high loads and ensure low latency response times. On the other hand, Zuul relies on a single instance and may encounter performance issues when faced with heavy traffic.

  2. Configuration Flexibility: Apigee provides a user-friendly graphical interface for configuring API policies and rules, making it easier for non-technical users to manage APIs. In contrast, Zuul requires developers to manually configure and customize filters and routing rules in code, offering greater flexibility but also requiring more technical expertise.

  3. Built-in Security Features: Apigee offers a wide range of built-in security features, such as OAuth 2.0 integration, threat protection, and rate limiting. It also supports JWT validation and access control policies. Zuul, on the other hand, does not provide these security features out of the box and requires developers to implement them manually.

  4. Integration and Extensibility: Apigee seamlessly integrates with various backend systems and offers a range of connectors and plugins, enabling easy integration with popular tools and services. It also provides extension points for developers to customize and extend its functionalities. Zuul, while being customizable, may require more effort for integration and extensibility due to its more limited ecosystem.

  5. Analytics and Monitoring: Apigee provides extensive analytics and monitoring capabilities, allowing users to track API usage, performance, and other metrics in real-time. It offers dashboards, reports, and alerts to aid in monitoring and troubleshooting. Zuul, on the other hand, does not offer built-in analytics and monitoring features, requiring developers to set up additional tools or services for this purpose.

  6. Vendor and Community Support: Apigee is a widely recognized and established API gateway solution with comprehensive vendor support and a large user community. It offers extensive documentation, support resources, and regular updates. Zuul, while being open-source and backed by Netflix, has a smaller community and may have limited vendor-specific support.

In summary, Apigee offers superior performance, configuration flexibility, built-in security features, extensive integration capabilities, analytics, and community support compared to Zuul. However, Zuul provides developers with greater customization options and the ability to tailor the gateway to specific requirements.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Apigee
Pros of Zuul
  • 12
    Highly scalable and secure API Management Platform
  • 6
    Good documentation
  • 6
    Quick jumpstart
  • 3
    Fast and adjustable caching
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 8
    Load blancing

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Apigee
Cons of Zuul
  • 11
    Expensive
  • 1
    Doesn't support hybrid natively
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Apigee?

    API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

    What is Zuul?

    It is the front door for all requests from devices and websites to the backend of the Netflix streaming application. As an edge service application, It is built to enable dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency, and security. Routing is an integral part of a microservice architecture.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Apigee?
    What companies use Zuul?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Apigee or Zuul.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Apigee?
    What tools integrate with Zuul?
    What are some alternatives to Apigee and Zuul?
    Mashery
    Sign In and discover new APIs from our open data commons of RESTful APIs. Mashery's API management offerings include strategic consulting & developer support to help you build your business.
    Kong
    Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality and services beyond the core platform.
    WSO2
    It delivers the only complete open source middleware platform. With its revolutionary componentized design, it is also the only open source platform-as-a-service for private and public clouds available today. With it, seamless migration and integration between servers, private clouds, and public clouds is now a reality.
    Istio
    Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.
    Postman
    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.
    See all alternatives