Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apollo vs OpenShift: What are the differences?
Introduction
Apollo and OpenShift are two popular platforms used for managing and deploying applications. While they may have some similarities, there are several key differences between the two.
Architecture: Apollo is a microservices-oriented platform, which means it is designed to support the development and deployment of applications that are made up of small, independent services. OpenShift, on the other hand, is a container platform that uses Kubernetes for orchestration, allowing for the deployment and management of containerized applications.
Deployment Options: Apollo offers both cloud-based and on-premise deployment options, giving users the flexibility to choose where their applications are hosted. OpenShift primarily focuses on providing cloud-based deployment options, with integration and support for various public cloud providers.
Scalability: Apollo includes built-in scalability features, such as auto-scaling and load balancing, which can automatically adjust resource allocation based on demand. OpenShift also supports scalability, but the specifics may vary depending on the underlying infrastructure and configuration.
Service Discovery: Apollo includes a built-in service registry and discovery mechanism, making it easier to locate and connect to different services within a microservices architecture. OpenShift relies on Kubernetes for service discovery, leveraging its features to facilitate service communication and discovery.
Developer Experience: Apollo provides a comprehensive set of tools and frameworks that are specifically tailored for working with microservices, including support for service mesh, API gateways, and distributed tracing. OpenShift, on the other hand, offers a more generalized platform for containerized applications, with a focus on providing a robust and scalable infrastructure.
Community and Support: Apollo is an open-source project supported by a community of developers and contributors. It benefits from the collaborative efforts of its community, with regular updates and improvements. OpenShift is backed by Red Hat, a prominent technology company, and it offers enterprise-level support and services to its users.
In summary, Apollo is a microservices-oriented platform with a focus on scalability and providing a comprehensive developer experience, while OpenShift is a container platform that leverages Kubernetes for orchestration and primarily focuses on cloud-based deployment options.
We wanted to save as much time as possible when writing our back-end, therefore Apollo was out of the question, we went for an auto-generated API instead. Hasura looked good in the beginning, but we wanted to retain the ability to add a few manual resolvers and modifications to auto-generated ones, which ruled out Hasura. Postgraphile with its Plug-In architecture was the right choice for us, we never regretted it!
Pros of Apollo
- From the creators of Meteor12
- Great documentation8
- Open source3
- Real time if use subscription2
Pros of Red Hat OpenShift
- Good free plan99
- Open Source63
- Easy setup47
- Nodejs support43
- Well documented42
- Custom domains32
- Mongodb support28
- Clean and simple architecture27
- PHP support25
- Customizable environments21
- Ability to run CRON jobs11
- Easier than Heroku for a WordPress blog9
- Easy deployment8
- PostgreSQL support7
- Autoscaling7
- Good balance between Heroku and AWS for flexibility7
- Free, Easy Setup, Lot of Gear or D.I.Y Gear5
- Shell access to gears4
- Great Support3
- High Security3
- Logging & Metrics3
- Cloud Agnostic2
- Runs Anywhere - AWS, GCP, Azure2
- No credit card needed2
- Because it is easy to manage2
- Secure2
- Meteor support2
- Overly complicated and over engineered in majority of e2
- Golang support2
- Its free and offer custom domain usage2
- Autoscaling at a good price point1
- Easy setup and great customer support1
- MultiCloud1
- Great free plan with excellent support1
- This is the only free one among the three as of today1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Apollo
- File upload is not supported1
- Increase in complexity of implementing (subscription)1
Cons of Red Hat OpenShift
- Decisions are made for you, limiting your options2
- License cost2
- Behind, sometimes severely, the upstreams1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Apollo?
What is Red Hat OpenShift?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Apollo?
What companies use Red Hat OpenShift?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Apollo?
What tools integrate with Red Hat OpenShift?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+14Rafay Systems
+8
+6
+32+47