StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Video Hosting
  4. Screen Sharing
  5. Mattermost vs appear.in

Mattermost vs appear.in

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

appear.in
appear.in
Stacks103
Followers85
Votes36
Mattermost
Mattermost
Stacks480
Followers582
Votes302

Mattermost vs appear.in: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between Mattermost and appear.in 

Mattermost and appear.in are both communication tools used in the business environment with their unique features and functionalities. Understanding the key differences between the two can help in selecting the most suitable platform for your business needs.

1. **Messaging vs Video Conferencing**: Mattermost primarily focuses on providing messaging and collaboration features, enabling teams to communicate effectively through text, files, and notifications. On the other hand, appear.in is designed for video conferencing and online meetings, allowing users to have face-to-face interactions regardless of their locations.

2. **Self-hosted vs Web-based**: A significant difference between Mattermost and appear.in is their deployment options. Mattermost offers a self-hosted solution, allowing businesses to have full control over their data and customization. In contrast, appear.in is a web-based platform, eliminating the need for installation or maintenance, making it a more accessible option for quick video conferencing needs.

3. **Integration Capabilities**: Mattermost provides extensive integration capabilities with various third-party applications and services, facilitating seamless workflow automation and collaboration. On the contrary, while appear.in does offer integrations, its focus remains more on the core video conferencing functionality rather than extensive integrations.

4. **Security Features**: Mattermost emphasizes security and compliance, providing end-to-end encryption, advanced access controls, and compliance with industry standards. In comparison, while appear.in ensures secure communications, its security features may be comparatively basic, especially for businesses requiring high levels of data protection.

5. **Collaborative Tools**: Mattermost includes a wide range of collaborative tools such as customizable chat channels, file sharing, and task management features, enhancing team productivity and coordination. In contrast, appear.in's collaborative tools are more focused on facilitating smooth video conferencing experiences rather than comprehensive team collaboration functionalities.

6. **Scalability and Pricing**: Mattermost offers scalable solutions suitable for small businesses to large enterprises, with flexible pricing plans accommodating various budget requirements. In contrast, appear.in is more straightforward in terms of scalability, and its pricing structure is generally based on the number of participants in video meetings.

In Summary, Understanding the key differences between Mattermost and appear.in is crucial in selecting the most appropriate communication tool based on your organization's specific needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

appear.in
appear.in
Mattermost
Mattermost

Create a video room. Share the link. Appear together. Built with WebRTC & AngularJS.

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

iPhone App;Create an appear.in room and send the link to the room on e-mail, chat, SMS etc;No installation required
All your team communication in one place, searchable and accessible anywhere; Slack-compatible, not Slack-limited. Imports Slack channels, users and themes. Offers Slack-compatible webhooks and integrations including Hubot, Jenkins, GitLab and others; Self-host ready with System Console and IT admin tools for managing dozens of team sites. Installs with Linux binary, plus Docker, Heroku, AWS, Azure and Cloud Foundry options
Statistics
Stacks
103
Stacks
480
Followers
85
Followers
582
Votes
36
Votes
302
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 12
    Easy setup
  • 11
    Free
  • 8
    Quick and painless for non techies
  • 3
    Near Real-Time
  • 1
    Screen sharing
Pros
  • 60
    Open source
  • 41
    On-premise deployment
  • 26
    Free
  • 22
    Built using golang
  • 21
    Fast and easy to use
Cons
  • 2
    Less integrations and plugins than slack
  • 2
    Custom sidewide themes only in enterprise
  • 2
    Many basic features are enterprise only
  • 1
    Basic permissions only in enterprise edition
  • 1
    Not compatible with Telegram keys, which used by FSB
Integrations
No integrations available
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Segment
Segment
Jenkins
Jenkins
GitLab
GitLab
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Hubot
Hubot
Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry
Amazon SES
Amazon SES

What are some alternatives to appear.in, Mattermost?

Slack

Slack

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

HipChat

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

RocketChat

RocketChat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Gitter

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Flowdock

Flowdock

Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.

Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

Telegram

Telegram

Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices.

Keybase Teams

Keybase Teams

Keybase is for anyone. Imagine a Slack for the whole world, except end-to-end encrypted across all your devices. Or a Team Dropbox where the server can't leak your files or be hacked.

Fleep

Fleep

Leave email behind and manage all conversations with your team, partners and clients in Fleep. If some of them are not Fleep users yet, they will receive all messages as normal emails.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack