StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Low Code Platforms
  5. Appsmith vs Stacker

Appsmith vs Stacker

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Stacker
Stacker
Stacks24
Followers60
Votes5
Appsmith
Appsmith
Stacks57
Followers117
Votes0
GitHub Stars38.4K
Forks4.3K

Appsmith vs Stacker : What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Appsmith and Stacker, it is important to recognize the key differences that set these two platforms apart in order to make an informed decision on which one suits your needs best.

  1. Integration Capabilities: Appsmith offers integration with a wide range of third-party services through APIs, allowing you to connect to various databases, external APIs, and services seamlessly. On the other hand, Stacker primarily focuses on integrating with popular cloud-based services such as Google Sheets and Airtable, limiting its connectivity options compared to Appsmith.

  2. Customization Options: Appsmith provides extensive customization options, enabling users to create their own widgets, styles, and themes to tailor the look and feel of their applications. Stacker, however, follows a more structured approach with pre-built templates and configurations, offering less flexibility in terms of customization.

  3. Collaboration Features: Appsmith emphasizes collaboration by providing real-time editing capabilities, allowing multiple users to work on the same project simultaneously. In contrast, Stacker offers basic collaboration features, with limited options for team members to collaborate on projects in real time.

  4. Deployment Options: Appsmith supports self-hosted deployment, giving users more control over their application's hosting environment. Stacker, on the other hand, is primarily a cloud-based platform with limited options for self-hosting, which may impact users who require stricter hosting requirements.

  5. Scalability: Appsmith offers scalability with the ability to build complex applications with multiple functionalities and integration points. Stacker, while suitable for smaller projects and simple applications, may lack the scalability needed for more complex projects requiring extensive customization and integration.

  6. Learning Curve: Appsmith has a steeper learning curve due to its flexibility and customization options, which may require users to have a deeper understanding of web development concepts. Stacker, with its more straightforward and structured approach, offers a lower learning curve, making it more accessible to users with limited technical expertise.

In Summary, the key differences between Appsmith and Stacker lie in their integration capabilities, customization options, collaboration features, deployment options, scalability, and learning curve, ultimately influencing the choice of platform based on specific project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Stacker
Stacker
Appsmith
Appsmith

Stacker lets you turn your spreadsheets into applications. You plug in your Airtable or Google Sheets and Stacker automatically generates you app with login, forms and buttons. Stacker includes built in permissions, UI and business logic.

Open source framework to build, deploy and share internal apps. Use UI widgets like tables, charts, forms, maps, and more. Easily connect to DBs like Postgres, Mongo, MySQL++ or REST API/GraphQL and use JS anywhere.

Build instant customer portals; Control access to your data by field and record; Keep your existing spreadsheets; Integrates with Google Sheets; Integrates with Airtable; Securely share your data
Deploy Appsmith on your servers in 5 minutes; Drag & drop, resize and style widgets without HTML / CSS; Query & update your database directly from the UI. Connect to PostgreSQL, MongoDB, MySQL, REST & GraphQL APIs; Write snippets of business logic using JS to transform data, manipulate UI or trigger workflows. Use popular libraries like lodash & moment anywhere in the app; Simple configuration to create flows when users interact with the UI; Changes in your application reflect instantly with every edit. No need to compile; Connect directly to any PostgreSQL, MySQL & MongoDB; Control who can edit / view your applications from a single control panel; Build and organise multiple applications on a single platform
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
38.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.3K
Stacks
24
Stacks
57
Followers
60
Followers
117
Votes
5
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    You can now make beautiful UIs without writing code :)
  • 2
    Seriously powerful and easy to use
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Zapier
Zapier
Google Sheets
Google Sheets
Airtable
Airtable
SMTP
SMTP
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
Shopify
Shopify
ArangoDB
ArangoDB
Fauna
Fauna
Cloud Firestore
Cloud Firestore
cURL
cURL
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
MySQL
MySQL
MongoDB
MongoDB

What are some alternatives to Stacker , Appsmith?

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Stamplay

Stamplay

The API-based development platform enabling developers to do 80% of the job in 1% of the time thanks to: out of the box APIs for users and data, one-click integration with any API, scalable infrastructure and SDKs. Build Rome in a day.

Kumologica

Kumologica

It is the first low-code development solution that run your integration and automation services serverlessly on any cloud. It provides drag and drop visual designer and low code approach to ensure the greatest speed and flexibility to support a wide range of integrations compatible with most of the platforms and cloud providers.

Backand

Backand

Backand is a powerful backend-as-a-service for AngularJS that provides out-of-the-box social login, push notifications, Ionic integration and much more.

Magic xpa

Magic xpa

It enables rapid creation of cross-platform business applications for desktop, web and mobile, so you can take advantage of new business opportunities quickly and on-demand.

Knack

Knack

Build simple web apps like a member directory, job listings, employee time tracking, business directory, contact directory, product catalogue, or equipment tracker.

Mavo

Mavo

Mavo helps you turn your static HTML into reactive web applications without a single line of programming code.

iLeap

iLeap

ILeap is a low-code app development platform to build custom apps and automate workflows visually, helping you speed up digital transformation.

Google App Maker

Google App Maker

App Maker lets you develop powerful apps with relative ease. Create a model to manage your data, build a UI in the visual editor, use Apps Script to write some scripts, and you're on your way.

Retool

Retool

Retool is the fast way to build internal tools. Drag-and-drop our building blocks and connect them to your databases and APIs to build your own tools, instantly. Built by developers, for developers. Trusted by startups and Fortune 500s.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase