StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Appveyor vs Bitbucket Pipelines

Appveyor vs Bitbucket Pipelines

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Appveyor
Appveyor
Stacks123
Followers131
Votes94
Bitbucket Pipelines
Bitbucket Pipelines
Stacks350
Followers368
Votes0

Appveyor vs Bitbucket Pipelines: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of continuous integration and deployment tools, Appveyor and Bitbucket Pipelines stand out as popular choices among developers. Understanding the key differences between these two platforms can help teams make informed decisions about their CI/CD workflows.

  1. Supported integrations: Appveyor offers native integration with Microsoft technologies such as .NET and Visual Studio, providing seamless support for these development ecosystems. On the other hand, Bitbucket Pipelines integrates effortlessly with Bitbucket repositories, enabling users to leverage its built-in support for Docker containers and Kubernetes deployments.

  2. Pricing model: Appveyor follows a usage-based pricing model, charging users based on the number of concurrent builds and build minutes consumed. In contrast, Bitbucket Pipelines' pricing is included as part of the Bitbucket Cloud subscription, which may be advantageous for teams already using Bitbucket for version control.

  3. Customizability and extensibility: Bitbucket Pipelines allows users to define custom pipelines using YAML configuration files, offering a high degree of flexibility in defining build, test, and deployment stages. Appveyor, while configurable, may have more limitations in terms of customization compared to Bitbucket Pipelines.

  4. Environment configurations: Appveyor provides users with predefined build environments containing various development tools and dependencies, simplifying the setup process for projects. Bitbucket Pipelines allows users to define custom Docker images for their pipelines, offering more control over the environment configurations.

  5. Scalability and performance: Appveyor is known for its robust infrastructure and high-performance build environments, making it suitable for scaling up CI/CD pipelines for larger projects. Bitbucket Pipelines, while efficient for small to medium-sized projects, may have limitations in handling heavy workloads and complex build scenarios.

  6. Community and support: Appveyor has an active community of users, providing forums and documentation to assist developers in setting up their CI/CD pipelines. Bitbucket Pipelines benefits from Atlassian's support ecosystem, offering a range of resources such as documentation, tutorials, and customer support services to help users navigate the platform effectively.

In Summary, understanding the nuances in supported integrations, pricing models, customizability, environment configurations, scalability, and community support distinguishes Appveyor and Bitbucket Pipelines in the realm of CI/CD tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Appveyor
Appveyor
Bitbucket Pipelines
Bitbucket Pipelines

AppVeyor aims to give powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment tools to every .NET developer without the hassle of setting up and maintaining their own build server.

It is an Integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment for Bitbucket Cloud that's trivial to set up, automating your code from test to production. Our mission is to enable all teams to ship software faster by driving the practice of continuous delivery.

Scriptless, repetitive, one-click deployment of build artifacts to multiple environments;YAML configuration;Backed by Windows Azure platform;Built-in NuGet feeds with project artifacts;Build artifacts are stored in a highly-durable Geo-redundant cloud storage;
Continuous integration and delivery; Map the branch structure; Run as service; Extend your workflow; Go multilingual with Docker; Use environment Variables; Skip the queue;
Statistics
Stacks
123
Stacks
350
Followers
131
Followers
368
Votes
94
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 20
    Github integration
  • 18
    Simple, reliable & powerful
  • 12
    Hosted
  • 11
    YML-based configuration
  • 10
    Nuget support
Cons
  • 1
    Complex user interface
  • 1
    Poor documentation
No community feedback yet
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
.NET
.NET
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Appveyor, Bitbucket Pipelines?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana