StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Appveyor vs Strider

Appveyor vs Strider

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Appveyor
Appveyor
Stacks123
Followers131
Votes94
Strider
Strider
Stacks21
Followers38
Votes11
GitHub Stars4.6K
Forks426

Appveyor vs Strider: What are the differences?

Developers describe Appveyor as "Continuous Integration and Deployment service for busy Windows developers". AppVeyor aims to give powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment tools to every .NET developer without the hassle of setting up and maintaining their own build server. On the other hand, Strider is detailed as "*Open-Source Continuous Integration and Deployment Server *". Strider is an Open Source Continuous Deployment / Continuous Integration platform. It is written in Node.JS / JavaScript and uses MongoDB as a backing store. It is published under the BSD license.

Appveyor and Strider belong to "Continuous Integration" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by Appveyor are:

  • Scriptless, repetitive, one-click deployment of build artifacts to multiple environments
  • YAML configuration
  • Backed by Windows Azure platform

On the other hand, Strider provides the following key features:

  • add hooks to perform arbitrary actions during build.
  • modify the database schema to add custom fields.
  • register their own HTTP routes.

"Github integration" is the primary reason why developers consider Appveyor over the competitors, whereas "Free Open Source" was stated as the key factor in picking Strider.

Strider is an open source tool with 4.33K GitHub stars and 434 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Strider's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Appveyor
Appveyor
Strider
Strider

AppVeyor aims to give powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment tools to every .NET developer without the hassle of setting up and maintaining their own build server.

Strider is an Open Source Continuous Deployment / Continuous Integration platform. It is written in Node.JS / JavaScript and uses MongoDB as a backing store. It is published under the BSD license.

Scriptless, repetitive, one-click deployment of build artifacts to multiple environments;YAML configuration;Backed by Windows Azure platform;Built-in NuGet feeds with project artifacts;Build artifacts are stored in a highly-durable Geo-redundant cloud storage;
add hooks to perform arbitrary actions during build.;modify the database schema to add custom fields.;register their own HTTP routes.;subscribe to and emit socket events.;create or modify user interfaces within Strider.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
4.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
426
Stacks
123
Stacks
21
Followers
131
Followers
38
Votes
94
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 20
    Github integration
  • 18
    Simple, reliable & powerful
  • 12
    Hosted
  • 11
    YML-based configuration
  • 10
    Nuget support
Cons
  • 1
    Complex user interface
  • 1
    Poor documentation
Pros
  • 6
    Free Open Source
  • 5
    Hosted Internally
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
.NET
.NET
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Appveyor, Strider?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana