StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Hosted Package Repository
  5. aptly vs fpm

aptly vs fpm

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

aptly
aptly
Stacks18
Followers23
Votes0
fpm
fpm
Stacks80
Followers93
Votes2
GitHub Stars11.4K
Forks1.1K

aptly vs fpm: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between aptly and fpm 

aptly and fpm are both package management tools but have distinct differences that make them suitable for different use cases. 

1. **Package Sources**: aptly is a repository management tool that can create and manage Debian package repositories, while fpm is more versatile and can work with a variety of package formats such as DEB, RPM, Python Eggs, and others.
   
2. **Build Process**: aptly does not provide built-in package building capabilities and relies on external tools for package creation, whereas fpm includes the ability to build packages from source files or binaries directly.

3. **Dependency Resolution**: aptly by default relies on APT package manager for dependency resolution when working with Debian packages, while fpm does not have built-in dependency handling and requires users to manage dependencies manually.

4. **Suitable Environments**: aptly is better suited for managing and hosting Debian package repositories for software distribution, while fpm is commonly used for creating standalone packages for deployment or installation on various systems.

5. **Community Support**: aptly has a strong community support for Debian-based systems due to its focus on managing Debian packages, while fpm has broader community support across multiple platforms due to its versatility with different package formats.

6. **Extensibility**: fpm allows for custom plugins and scripts to extend its functionality, making it highly customizable, whereas aptly has limited extensibility options and is more focused on repository management.

In Summary, aptly is specialized for managing Debian package repositories with APT integration, while fpm is a versatile tool for creating packages in various formats with greater customization capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

aptly
aptly
fpm
fpm

aptly is a swiss army knife for Debian repository management: it allows you to mirror remote repositories, manage local package repositories, take snapshots, pull new versions of packages along with dependencies, publish as Debian repository.

It helps you build packages quickly and easily (Packages like RPM and DEB formats).

Mirror repository;Take snapshot;Publish your packages;Publish snapshot;Upgrade package versions;Merge snapshots;Filter repository;Publishing to S3;Package search;REST API
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
11.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
18
Stacks
80
Followers
23
Followers
93
Votes
0
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Easy to use
Integrations
No integrations available
Linux
Linux
Debian
Debian
Fedora
Fedora
CentOS
CentOS
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to aptly, fpm?

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Elm

Elm

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

Julia

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Racket

Racket

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

PureScript

PureScript

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

Composer

Composer

It is a tool for dependency management in PHP. It allows you to declare the libraries your project depends on and it will manage (install/update) them for you.

pnpm

pnpm

It uses hard links and symlinks to save one version of a module only ever once on a disk. When using npm or Yarn for example, if you have 100 projects using the same version of lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be saved in a single place on the disk and a hard link will put it into the node_modules where it should be installed.

Conan

Conan

Install or build your own packages for any platform. Conan also allows you to run your own server easily from the command line.

Gemfury

Gemfury

Hosted service for your private and custom packages to simplify your deployment story. Once you upload your packages and enable your Gemfury repository, you can securely deploy any package to any host. Your private RubyGems, Python packages, and NPM modules will be safe and within reach on Gemfury. Install them to any machine in minutes without worrying about running and securing your own private repository.<br>

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana