StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. Autocode IDE vs KrakenD

Autocode IDE vs KrakenD

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

KrakenD
KrakenD
Stacks59
Followers158
Votes9
Autocode IDE
Autocode IDE
Stacks5
Followers20
Votes0

Autocode IDE vs KrakenD: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Autocode IDE and KrakenD:

  1. Language Support: Autocode IDE supports a variety of languages like JavaScript, Python, Ruby, while KrakenD is specifically designed for API Gateway and supports only Go programming language.

  2. Development Environment: Autocode IDE provides a visual development environment with drag-and-drop components, making it user-friendly for beginners, whereas KrakenD focuses on a text-based configuration approach for defining API endpoints and routes.

  3. Deployment Options: Autocode IDE offers seamless deployment to various cloud platforms like AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure, whereas KrakenD is typically deployed on-premises or in a private cloud environment for better control and security.

  4. Integration Capabilities: Autocode IDE comes with built-in integrations for popular third-party services like Slack, Twilio, and GitHub, facilitating quick and easy integration, while KrakenD focuses on handling high traffic and proxying requests to backend services efficiently.

  5. Community Support: Autocode IDE has a strong online community that actively contributes plugins, templates, and tutorials to enhance the development experience, whereas KrakenD has a smaller but dedicated community focused on improving the performance and scalability of API services.

  6. Scalability and Performance: Autocode IDE is more suited for small to medium-sized projects where rapid development and prototyping are essential, while KrakenD is designed for handling large-scale API traffic with features like caching, load balancing, and rate-limiting mechanisms in place.

In Summary, Autocode IDE focuses on user-friendly development with multi-language support and integrations, while KrakenD specializes in high-performance API gateway solutions using the Go programming language.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

KrakenD
KrakenD
Autocode IDE
Autocode IDE

Its core functionality is to create an API that acts as an aggregator of many microservices into single endpoints, doing the heavy-lifting automatically for you: aggregate, transform, filter, decode, throttle, auth and more.

It is an integrated development environment (IDE) for connecting APIs and creating app-to-app workflows. It provides API autocomplete, code generation, easy multi-app auth, in-browser code execution, dev environments, logging, revision history + mor

Throttling and usage quotas; Extensible architecture; Circuit breaker; High-load and burst; Service discovery
Autocomplete for APIs; Authentication Made Easy; Test Code in the Browser; Complete Revision History; Build Your Own APIs
Statistics
Stacks
59
Stacks
5
Followers
158
Followers
20
Votes
9
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Best performant
  • 2
    Documentation
  • 2
    Stateless
  • 1
    GitOps oriented
  • 1
    Easy to install
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Keycloak
Keycloak
Docker
Docker
Auth0
Auth0
ELK
ELK
Logstash
Logstash
Grafana
Grafana
Kibana
Kibana
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to KrakenD, Autocode IDE?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope