StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Infrastructure Build Tools
  5. AWS Cloud Development Kit vs Azure Resource Manager

AWS Cloud Development Kit vs Azure Resource Manager

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Resource Manager
Azure Resource Manager
Stacks40
Followers93
Votes11
GitHub Stars64
Forks47
AWS Cloud Development Kit
AWS Cloud Development Kit
Stacks205
Followers102
Votes0
GitHub Stars12.5K
Forks4.3K

AWS Cloud Development Kit vs Azure Resource Manager: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AWS Cloud Development Kit and Azure Resource Manager

AWS Cloud Development Kit (CDK) and Azure Resource Manager (ARM) are both infrastructure-as-code (IaC) tools that allow developers to define and manage cloud resources using code. While they share similar objectives, there are several key differences between the two platforms.

  1. Language and Framework: One significant difference between CDK and ARM is the programming languages and frameworks they support. CDK allows developers to define cloud infrastructure using familiar programming languages like TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Java, and .NET. On the other hand, ARM primarily relies on JSON or YAML templates for infrastructure definition.

  2. Level of Abstraction: CDK operates at a higher level of abstraction compared to ARM. It provides a more developer-friendly experience by leveraging object-oriented programming concepts, allowing developers to define infrastructure resources using constructs and classes. In contrast, ARM is a declarative language that defines resources and their properties using JSON or YAML templates.

  3. Multi-Cloud Support: CDK supports multi-cloud environments, enabling developers to define infrastructure resources for different cloud providers using the same codebase. It offers a level of portability by abstracting cloud-specific details. In contrast, ARM is specific to the Microsoft Azure ecosystem and is not designed to work with other cloud providers.

  4. Ease of Deployment: CDK provides a streamlined deployment process by leveraging AWS CloudFormation. It automates the creation and management of AWS resources, making it easier to deploy infrastructure changes. On the other hand, ARM relies on Azure Resource Manager for resource provisioning, which may involve additional steps and configurations.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: CDK benefits from a broader community and ecosystem due to its support for multiple programming languages. It has a more active and growing community, which results in a wider range of libraries, examples, and documentation. ARM, being specific to Azure, has its own community, but it may not be as extensive or diverse as CDK.

  6. Maturity and Adoption: CDK is a relatively newer platform compared to ARM, which has been in use for a longer period. While CDK has gained rapid adoption and popularity, ARM has a more extensive track record, with many enterprises already heavily relying on it for managing Azure resources.

In summary, the key differences between AWS Cloud Development Kit (CDK) and Azure Resource Manager (ARM) include programming language and framework support, level of abstraction, multi-cloud capability, ease of deployment, community and ecosystem, as well as maturity and adoption. These distinctions offer developers various options and considerations when choosing an infrastructure-as-code tool.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Resource Manager
Azure Resource Manager
AWS Cloud Development Kit
AWS Cloud Development Kit

It is the deployment and management service for Azure. It provides a management layer that enables you to create, update, and delete resources in your Azure subscription. You use management features, like access control, locks, and tags, to secure and organize your resources after deployment.

It is an open source software development framework to model and provision your cloud application resources using familiar programming languages. It uses the familiarity and expressive power of programming languages for modeling your applications. It provides you with high-level components that preconfigure cloud resources with proven defaults, so you can build cloud applications without needing to be an expert.

Deploy app resources; Organize resources; Control access to resources
Easier cloud onboarding; Faster development process; Customizable and shareable; No context switching
Statistics
GitHub Stars
64
GitHub Stars
12.5K
GitHub Forks
47
GitHub Forks
4.3K
Stacks
40
Stacks
205
Followers
93
Followers
102
Votes
11
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Bicep - Simple Declarative Language
  • 2
    RBAC and Policies in templates
  • 1
    Infrastructure-as-Code
  • 1
    Deep integration with Azure services like Azure Policy
  • 1
    Over 1K samples the QuickStart repo
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
Ruby
Ruby
Terraform
Terraform
rkt
rkt
C#
C#
JavaScript
JavaScript
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Java
Java
Python
Python
TypeScript
TypeScript
.NET
.NET
AWS CloudFormation
AWS CloudFormation

What are some alternatives to Azure Resource Manager, AWS Cloud Development Kit?

AWS CloudFormation

AWS CloudFormation

You can use AWS CloudFormation’s sample templates or create your own templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run your application. You don’t need to figure out the order in which AWS services need to be provisioned or the subtleties of how to make those dependencies work.

Packer

Packer

Packer automates the creation of any type of machine image. It embraces modern configuration management by encouraging you to use automated scripts to install and configure the software within your Packer-made images.

Scalr

Scalr

Scalr is a remote state & operations backend for Terraform with access controls, policy as code, and many quality of life features.

Pulumi

Pulumi

Pulumi is a cloud development platform that makes creating cloud programs easy and productive. Skip the YAML and just write code. Pulumi is multi-language, multi-cloud and fully extensible in both its engine and ecosystem of packages.

Habitat

Habitat

Habitat is a new approach to automation that focuses on the application instead of the infrastructure it runs on. With Habitat, the apps you build, deploy, and manage behave consistently in any runtime — metal, VMs, containers, and PaaS. You'll spend less time on the environment and more time building features.

Google Cloud Deployment Manager

Google Cloud Deployment Manager

Google Cloud Deployment Manager allows you to specify all the resources needed for your application in a declarative format using yaml.

Yocto

Yocto

It is an open source collaboration project that helps developers create custom Linux-based systems regardless of the hardware architecture. It provides a flexible set of tools and a space where embedded developers worldwide can share technologies, software stacks, configurations, and best practices that can be used to create tailored Linux images for embedded and IOT devices, or anywhere a customized Linux OS is needed.

GeoEngineer

GeoEngineer

GeoEngineer uses Terraform to plan and execute changes, so the DSL to describe resources is similar to Terraform's. GeoEngineer's DSL also provides programming and object oriented features like inheritance, abstraction, branching and looping.

Atlas

Atlas

Atlas is one foundation to manage and provide visibility to your servers, containers, VMs, configuration management, service discovery, and additional operations services.

Buildroot

Buildroot

It is a tool that simplifies and automates the process of building a complete Linux system for an embedded system, using cross-compilation.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana