StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. AWS CloudFormation vs Bitbucket

AWS CloudFormation vs Bitbucket

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Stacks41.1K
Followers33.4K
Votes2.8K
AWS CloudFormation
AWS CloudFormation
Stacks1.6K
Followers1.3K
Votes88

AWS CloudFormation vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?

Key differences between AWS CloudFormation and Bitbucket

CloudFormation and Bitbucket are two popular tools that offer different functionalities and features in the realm of cloud computing and software development. Below are the key differences between AWS CloudFormation and Bitbucket:

  1. Purpose and Functionality: AWS CloudFormation is a service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that helps manage and provision resources in an automated and scalable manner. It allows users to create templates to define and deploy the infrastructure and applications in AWS. On the other hand, Bitbucket is a web-based version control repository hosting service that enables teams to collaborate on software development projects, providing features like code versioning, pull requests, and issue tracking.

  2. Scalability and Flexibility: CloudFormation is designed to be highly scalable and flexible, allowing users to provision and manage a wide range of AWS resources and services. It supports automatic scaling and provides granular control over resource configurations. In contrast, Bitbucket focuses more on code collaboration and version control, providing features like branch-based workflows and code review functionality, but with limited support for infrastructure provisioning and management.

  3. Vendor Lock-in: AWS CloudFormation is tightly integrated with the AWS ecosystem, allowing users to easily provision, manage, and update AWS resources. However, this integration also creates a potential vendor lock-in, as CloudFormation templates may not be easily portable to other cloud providers. Bitbucket, being a version control repository, offers more portability as it supports both Git and Mercurial, which are widely used and can be hosted on different platforms.

  4. Automation and DevOps Integrations: AWS CloudFormation has extensive support for infrastructure as code (IaC) and DevOps practices. It can be integrated with various AWS services like AWS Lambda, AWS CodePipeline, and AWS CodeDeploy to enable continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) workflows. Bitbucket also provides integrations with other DevOps tools but primarily focuses on code collaboration rather than automating infrastructure deployments.

  5. Pricing Model: AWS CloudFormation is a service provided by Amazon Web Services and follows their pricing model, which is based on a pay-as-you-go approach. Users are billed for the resources provisioned and the actions performed using CloudFormation. Bitbucket, on the other hand, has its pricing model that offers different plans based on the number of users and repositories, with additional costs for additional features like advanced security and support.

  6. User Interface and User Experience: AWS CloudFormation provides a web-based console for managing and visualizing the infrastructure templates and stacks. It also provides a command-line interface (CLI) and API for programmatic access. Bitbucket offers a user-friendly web-based interface for managing repositories, pull requests, and code reviews. It also has a robust API that allows integration with other third-party tools.

In summary, AWS CloudFormation is primarily designed for infrastructure provisioning and management in AWS, with extensive automation capabilities and close integration with AWS services. Bitbucket, on the other hand, is a code collaboration and version control platform that focuses on enabling software development teams to work together efficiently.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, AWS CloudFormation

Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M
Comments
Timothy
Timothy

SRE

Mar 20, 2020

Decided

I personally am not a huge fan of vendor lock in for multiple reasons:

  • I've seen cost saving moves to the cloud end up costing a fortune and trapping companies due to over utilization of cloud specific features.
  • I've seen S3 failures nearly take down half the internet.
  • I've seen companies get stuck in the cloud because they aren't built cloud agnostic.

I choose to use terraform for my cloud provisioning for these reasons:

  • It's cloud agnostic so I can use it no matter where I am.
  • It isn't difficult to use and uses a relatively easy to read language.
  • It tests infrastructure before running it, and enables me to see and keep changes up to date.
  • It runs from the same CLI I do most of my CM work from.
385k views385k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket
Bitbucket
AWS CloudFormation
AWS CloudFormation

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

You can use AWS CloudFormation’s sample templates or create your own templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run your application. You don’t need to figure out the order in which AWS services need to be provisioned or the subtleties of how to make those dependencies work.

Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial
AWS CloudFormation comes with the following ready-to-run sample templates: WordPress (blog),Tracks (project tracking), Gollum (wiki used by GitHub), Drupal (content management), Joomla (content management), Insoshi (social apps), Redmine (project mgmt);No Need to Reinvent the Wheel – A template can be used repeatedly to create identical copies of the same stack (or to use as a foundation to start a new stack);Transparent and Open – Templates are simple JSON formatted text files that can be placed under your normal source control mechanisms, stored in private or public locations such as Amazon S3 and exchanged via email.;Declarative and Flexible – To create the infrastructure you want, you enumerate what AWS resources, configuration values and interconnections you need in a template and then let AWS CloudFormation do the rest with a few simple clicks in the AWS Management Console, via the command line tools or by calling the APIs.
Statistics
Stacks
41.1K
Stacks
1.6K
Followers
33.4K
Followers
1.3K
Votes
2.8K
Votes
88
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 905
    Free private repos
  • 397
    Simple setup
  • 349
    Nice ui and tools
  • 342
    Unlimited private repositories
  • 240
    Affordable git hosting
Cons
  • 19
    Not much community activity
  • 17
    Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui
  • 15
    Quite buggy
  • 10
    Managed by enterprise Java company
  • 8
    CI tool is not free of charge
Pros
  • 43
    Automates infrastructure deployments
  • 21
    Declarative infrastructure and deployment
  • 13
    No more clicking around
  • 3
    Any Operative System you want
  • 3
    Infrastructure as code
Cons
  • 4
    Brittle
  • 2
    No RBAC and policies in templates
Integrations
Git
Git
AWS Cloud9
AWS Cloud9
Sentry
Sentry
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
npm
npm
Trello
Trello
Slack
Slack
Confluence
Confluence
Docker
Docker
Jira
Jira
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, AWS CloudFormation?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

Packer

Packer

Packer automates the creation of any type of machine image. It embraces modern configuration management by encouraging you to use automated scripts to install and configure the software within your Packer-made images.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana