AWS CloudHSM vs Google Cloud Endpoints

Overview

AWS CloudHSM

Stacks10

Followers56

Votes0

Google Cloud Endpoints

Stacks36

Followers149

Votes1

AWS CloudHSM vs Google Cloud Endpoints: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here is a comparison between AWS CloudHSM and Google Cloud Endpoints, highlighting their key differences.

Scalability and Availability: AWS CloudHSM offers highly scalable and available hardware security modules (HSMs) that can be easily scaled up or down to meet the demand. On the other hand, Google Cloud Endpoints provides a fully managed service that automatically scales based on the traffic and provides high availability across multiple regions.
Integration with Cloud Services: AWS CloudHSM seamlessly integrates with various AWS services, allowing you to store encryption keys securely and perform cryptographic operations within your AWS environment. In contrast, Google Cloud Endpoints integrates well with Google Cloud services, facilitating easy authentication, monitoring, and logging.
Pricing Model: AWS CloudHSM follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you are billed based on the number of HSM instances you use and the region you deploy them in. Google Cloud Endpoints uses a similar model with a pay-for-what-you-use approach, charging for the number of API requests made and the amount of data transferred.
Management and Maintenance: AWS CloudHSM requires more manual management and maintenance as you need to manage the HSM instances, software updates, and backups on your own. In contrast, Google Cloud Endpoints handles all the management and maintenance tasks, allowing you to focus on developing your applications.
Developer Experience: AWS CloudHSM provides a more traditional HSM experience, where developers have low-level control over cryptographic operations and can use standard APIs. Google Cloud Endpoints, on the other hand, abstracts away the complexity of cryptographic operations and offers a simplified developer experience with easy-to-use frameworks and built-in authentication.
Vendor Lock-In: While both AWS CloudHSM and Google Cloud Endpoints provide secure and scalable solutions, using either service may result in a certain level of vendor lock-in. Migrating between the two platforms may require significant effort and potentially entail rewriting parts of your applications.

In summary, AWS CloudHSM and Google Cloud Endpoints differ in terms of scalability, integration with cloud services, pricing model, management and maintenance, developer experience, and the level of vendor lock-in.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS CloudHSM	Google Cloud Endpoints
The AWS CloudHSM service allows you to protect your encryption keys within HSMs designed and validated to government standards for secure key management. You can securely generate, store, and manage the cryptographic keys used for data encryption such that they are accessible only by you. AWS CloudHSM helps you comply with strict key management requirements without sacrificing application performance.	An NGINX-based proxy and distributed architecture give unparalleled performance and scalability. Using an Open API Specification or one of our API frameworks, Cloud Endpoints gives you the tools you need for every phase of API development and provides insight with Google Cloud Monitoring, Cloud Trace, Google Cloud Logging and Cloud Trace.
Protect and store your cryptographic keys with industry standard, tamper-resistant HSM appliances. No one but you has access to your keys (including Amazon administrators who manage and maintain the appliance).;Use your most sensitive and regulated data on Amazon EC2 without giving applications direct access to your data's encryption keys.;Store and access data reliably from your applications that demand highly available and durable key storage and cryptographic operations.;Use AWS CloudHSM in conjunction with your compatible on-premise HSMs to replicate keys among on-premise HSMs and CloudHSMs. This increases key durability and makes it easy to migrate cryptographic applications from your datacenter to AWS.	-
Statistics
Stacks 10	Stacks 36
Followers 56	Followers 149
Votes 0	Votes 1
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 1 Android Integration
Integrations
No integrations available	Google App Engine Google Compute Engine Google Kubernetes Engine

What are some alternatives to AWS CloudHSM, Google Cloud Endpoints?

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

AWS Key Management Service

AWS Key Management Service (KMS) is a managed service that makes it easy for you to create and control the encryption keys used to encrypt your data, and uses Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) to protect the security of your keys. AWS Key Management Service is integrated with other AWS services including Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, and Amazon Redshift. AWS Key Management Service is also integrated with AWS CloudTrail to provide you with logs of all key usage to help meet your regulatory and compliance needs.

Related Comparisons

AWS CloudHSM vs Google Cloud Endpoints: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here is a comparison between AWS CloudHSM and Google Cloud Endpoints, highlighting their key differences.

Scalability and Availability: AWS CloudHSM offers highly scalable and available hardware security modules (HSMs) that can be easily scaled up or down to meet the demand. On the other hand, Google Cloud Endpoints provides a fully managed service that automatically scales based on the traffic and provides high availability across multiple regions.
Integration with Cloud Services: AWS CloudHSM seamlessly integrates with various AWS services, allowing you to store encryption keys securely and perform cryptographic operations within your AWS environment. In contrast, Google Cloud Endpoints integrates well with Google Cloud services, facilitating easy authentication, monitoring, and logging.
Pricing Model: AWS CloudHSM follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you are billed based on the number of HSM instances you use and the region you deploy them in. Google Cloud Endpoints uses a similar model with a pay-for-what-you-use approach, charging for the number of API requests made and the amount of data transferred.
Management and Maintenance: AWS CloudHSM requires more manual management and maintenance as you need to manage the HSM instances, software updates, and backups on your own. In contrast, Google Cloud Endpoints handles all the management and maintenance tasks, allowing you to focus on developing your applications.
Developer Experience: AWS CloudHSM provides a more traditional HSM experience, where developers have low-level control over cryptographic operations and can use standard APIs. Google Cloud Endpoints, on the other hand, abstracts away the complexity of cryptographic operations and offers a simplified developer experience with easy-to-use frameworks and built-in authentication.
Vendor Lock-In: While both AWS CloudHSM and Google Cloud Endpoints provide secure and scalable solutions, using either service may result in a certain level of vendor lock-in. Migrating between the two platforms may require significant effort and potentially entail rewriting parts of your applications.

AWS CloudHSM vs Google Cloud Endpoints

Overview

AWS CloudHSM vs Google Cloud Endpoints: What are the differences?