StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. AWS CodeBuild vs Visual Studio App Center

AWS CodeBuild vs Visual Studio App Center

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild
Stacks443
Followers485
Votes43
Visual Studio App Center
Visual Studio App Center
Stacks113
Followers232
Votes4

AWS CodeBuild vs Visual Studio App Center: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between AWS CodeBuild and Visual Studio App Center. Both are popular tools for continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) processes, but they have distinct features and capabilities.

  1. Pricing Model: AWS CodeBuild offers a pay-per-use pricing model, where you pay for the duration it takes to build and test your code. On the other hand, Visual Studio App Center follows a tiered pricing model, offering different plans based on usage and features. This difference in pricing models allows you to choose the most cost-effective option based on your specific needs.

  2. Supported Platforms: AWS CodeBuild is a cloud-based service that supports a wide range of platforms, including popular programming languages like Java, Python, Ruby, etc. It also integrates with other AWS services seamlessly. In contrast, Visual Studio App Center primarily focuses on mobile application development, supporting platforms like iOS, Android, Xamarin, React Native, etc. This difference makes CodeBuild more suitable for a broader range of projects, while App Center specializes in mobile app development.

  3. Build Environments: AWS CodeBuild provides a fully managed build environment, where you can configure your project's specific requirements like operating system, runtime, tools, etc. It allows for customization and flexibility by supporting your custom Docker images. On the other hand, Visual Studio App Center offers pre-configured build environments optimized for mobile app development. It simplifies the setup process, particularly for teams primarily focused on mobile development.

  4. Integration with Development Tools: AWS CodeBuild integrates seamlessly with various development tools and services, including AWS CodeCommit, AWS CodePipeline, and third-party tools like GitHub, Bitbucket, etc. It provides flexibility in building your CI/CD workflow. Visual Studio App Center, as the name suggests, is tightly integrated with the Visual Studio IDE, as well as other collaboration tools like GitHub, Azure DevOps, Slack, etc. This difference makes App Center more suitable for developers who predominantly use Visual Studio and other Microsoft tools.

  5. Testing and Deployment Capabilities: AWS CodeBuild mainly focuses on building and testing your code. It provides integration with popular testing frameworks and allows you to execute custom scripts for testing. However, it does not directly offer deployment capabilities, and you need to integrate with other deployment tools like AWS CodeDeploy. Visual Studio App Center, on the other hand, provides a comprehensive solution for building, testing, and deploying mobile applications. It offers features like automated UI testing, crash reporting, and distribution of apps for testing or production deployment.

  6. Analytics and Monitoring: AWS CodeBuild provides detailed build logs, allowing you to monitor the progress and troubleshoot any issues efficiently. It integrates with AWS CloudWatch for logs and metrics monitoring, providing valuable insights into your build process. Visual Studio App Center also provides logs and diagnostics information for build and testing processes. It offers additional features like crash analytics, performance monitoring, and engagement metrics for mobile apps. This difference makes App Center a more comprehensive solution for monitoring and analyzing the performance of mobile applications.

In Summary, AWS CodeBuild offers greater platform flexibility, customization options, and integration with various development tools, making it suitable for a wide range of projects. Visual Studio App Center focuses on mobile app development, provides pre-configured environments, tight integration with Visual Studio, and comprehensive testing and deployment features. The choice between these tools depends on your specific project requirements and development focus.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild
Visual Studio App Center
Visual Studio App Center

AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers.

Automate the lifecycle of your iOS, Android, Windows, and macOS apps. Connect your repo and within minutes build in the cloud, test on thousands of real devices, distribute to beta testers and app stores, and monitor real-world usage with crash and analytics data. All in one place.

Fully Managed Build Service;Continuous Scaling;Enables Continuous Integration;Integrates seamlessly with AWS services;FAQs: https://aws.amazon.com/codebuild/faqs/
Build; Test; Distribute; Crashes; Diagnostics; Analytics; Push; CD/CI;
Statistics
Stacks
443
Stacks
113
Followers
485
Followers
232
Votes
43
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Pay per minute
  • 5
    Parameter Store integration for passing secrets
  • 4
    Integrated with AWS
  • 3
    Bit bucket integration
  • 3
    Streaming logs to Amazon CloudWatch
Cons
  • 2
    Poor branch support
Pros
  • 1
    Slack integration
  • 1
    For Mobile apps diagnostics and tracking
  • 1
    Bug tracking integration
  • 1
    Show error issues for mobile devices
Integrations
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
AWS CloudFormation
AWS CloudFormation
Jenkins
Jenkins
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Slack
Slack

What are some alternatives to AWS CodeBuild, Visual Studio App Center?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot