AWS CodeCommit

232
431
+ 1
187
Azure Container Service

68
138
+ 1
9
Add tool

AWS CodeCommit vs Azure Container Service: What are the differences?

What is AWS CodeCommit? Fully-managed source control service that makes it easy for companies to host secure and highly scalable private Git repositories. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

What is Azure Container Service? Deploy and manage containers using the tools you choose. Azure Container Service optimizes the configuration of popular open source tools and technologies specifically for Azure. You get an open solution that offers portability for both your containers and your application configuration. You select the size, the number of hosts, and choice of orchestrator tools, and Container Service handles everything else.

AWS CodeCommit belongs to "Code Collaboration & Version Control" category of the tech stack, while Azure Container Service can be primarily classified under "Containers as a Service".

Some of the features offered by AWS CodeCommit are:

  • Collaboration
  • Encryption
  • Access Control

On the other hand, Azure Container Service provides the following key features:

  • Create a container hosting solution optimized for Azure
  • Scale and orchestrate applications using Apache Mesos or Docker Swarm
  • Use popular open source, client-side tooling

"Free private repos" is the primary reason why developers consider AWS CodeCommit over the competitors, whereas "Easy to setup, very agnostic" was stated as the key factor in picking Azure Container Service.

iMedicare, Complete Business Online, and Sidecar Interactive are some of the popular companies that use AWS CodeCommit, whereas Azure Container Service is used by QwikSense, Veris, and Sensewaves. AWS CodeCommit has a broader approval, being mentioned in 25 company stacks & 17 developers stacks; compared to Azure Container Service, which is listed in 8 company stacks and 7 developer stacks.

Pros of AWS CodeCommit
Pros of Azure Container Service

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of AWS CodeCommit
Cons of Azure Container Service
    No cons available

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is AWS CodeCommit?

    CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

    What is Azure Container Service?

    Azure Container Service optimizes the configuration of popular open source tools and technologies specifically for Azure. You get an open solution that offers portability for both your containers and your application configuration. You select the size, the number of hosts, and choice of orchestrator tools, and Container Service handles everything else.
    What companies use AWS CodeCommit?
    What companies use Azure Container Service?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with AWS CodeCommit?
    What tools integrate with Azure Container Service?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to AWS CodeCommit and Azure Container Service?
    GitHub
    GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
    GitLab
    GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
    Bitbucket
    Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
    GitHub Enterprise
    GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.
    SVN (Subversion)
    Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.
    See all alternatives
    Interest over time
    How much does AWS CodeCommit cost?
    How much does Azure Container Service cost?
    Pricing unavailable