StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. AWS CodeCommit vs CodeHub

AWS CodeCommit vs CodeHub

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit
Stacks324
Followers826
Votes193
CodeHub
CodeHub
Stacks12
Followers15
Votes0

AWS CodeCommit vs CodeHub: What are the differences?

# Introduction
AWS offers various services to support software development, including AWS CodeCommit and CodeHub. Both services play a crucial role in managing source code, but they have distinct differences that set them apart.

1. **Hosting**: AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed source control service that hosts private Git repositories, providing a secure, scalable, and highly available platform for storing code. On the other hand, CodeHub is a collaborative platform specifically tailored for developers to share, discover, and collaborate on open-source projects with the community.
  
2. **Pricing Model**: CodeCommit operates on a pay-as-you-go pricing structure where users are charged based on the number of active users, git requests, and storage consumed. In contrast, CodeHub is a free platform for developers to host their open-source projects without any cost implications.

3. **Access Control**: CodeCommit offers robust access control mechanisms, allowing users to manage permissions at a granular level using AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) policies. In comparison, CodeHub focuses more on promoting an open and inclusive environment for developers to contribute to projects without stringent access restrictions in place.

4. **Integration**: AWS CodeCommit seamlessly integrates with other AWS services such as AWS CodeBuild, CodePipeline, and AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), providing a comprehensive ecosystem for continuous integration and deployment workflows. In contrast, CodeHub offers integration with various third-party tools and platforms to enhance collaboration and productivity among developers.

5. **Enterprise Support**: CodeCommit provides enterprise-grade support, including service level agreements (SLAs), 24/7 technical support, and dedicated account managers for large organizations with specific requirements. CodeHub, being a community-centric platform, relies on community support and contributions to maintain and improve the platform's features and functionality.

6. **Scalability**: AWS CodeCommit is designed to scale effortlessly to accommodate large codebases and extensive collaboration efforts, ensuring high performance and reliability. CodeHub, while capable of hosting numerous open-source projects, may face scalability challenges when managing a significant influx of users and projects simultaneously.

In Summary, AWS CodeCommit and CodeHub offer distinct features and functionalities catered towards different use cases, with CodeCommit focusing on secure, private repositories for enterprise development teams, and CodeHub promoting collaboration and community engagement in open-source projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit
CodeHub
CodeHub

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

It is the best way to browse and maintain your GitHub repositories on any iOS device.

Collaboration;Encryption;Access Control;High Availability and Durability;Unlimited Repositories;Easy Access and Integration
Issues & Pulls Made Easy; Notifications & Events Be Aware; Repos & Code As GitHub Intended
Statistics
Stacks
324
Stacks
12
Followers
826
Followers
15
Votes
193
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 44
    Free private repos
  • 26
    IAM integration
  • 24
    Pay-As-You-Go Pricing
  • 20
    Amazon feels the most Secure
  • 19
    Repo data encrypted at rest
Cons
  • 12
    UI sucks
  • 4
    SLOW
  • 3
    No Issue Tracker
  • 2
    NO LFS support
  • 2
    No fork
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Git
Git
Jenkins
Jenkins
Atom
Atom
Slack
Slack
Postman
Postman

What are some alternatives to AWS CodeCommit, CodeHub?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana