AWS CodeCommit vs Codeship

AWS CodeCommit vs Codeship: What are the differences?

Developers describe AWS CodeCommit as "Fully-managed source control service that makes it easy for companies to host secure and highly scalable private Git repositories". CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools. On the other hand, Codeship is detailed as "A Continuous Integration Platform in the cloud". Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

AWS CodeCommit and Codeship are primarily classified as "Code Collaboration & Version Control" and "Continuous Integration" tools respectively.

Some of the features offered by AWS CodeCommit are:

• Collaboration
• Encryption
• Access Control

On the other hand, Codeship provides the following key features:

• Run you automated tests | Easily set up Codeship with Github or Bitbucket and trigger your automated tests with a simple push to your repository.
• 100 builds & 5 private projects free per month.
• Free for OSS.

"Free private repos" is the primary reason why developers consider AWS CodeCommit over the competitors, whereas "Simple deployments" was stated as the key factor in picking Codeship.

Product Hunt, Swat.io, and InVisionApp are some of the popular companies that use Codeship, whereas AWS CodeCommit is used by iMedicare, Complete Business Online, and Sidecar Interactive. Codeship has a broader approval, being mentioned in 277 company stacks & 82 developers stacks; compared to AWS CodeCommit, which is listed in 25 company stacks and 17 developer stacks.