AWS CodeCommit vs Sauce Labs

Overview

Sauce Labs

Stacks314

Followers435

Votes438

AWS CodeCommit

Stacks324

Followers826

Votes193

AWS CodeCommit vs Sauce Labs: What are the differences?

AWS CodeCommit: Fully-managed source control service that makes it easy for companies to host secure and highly scalable private Git repositories. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools; Sauce Labs: Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup. Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

AWS CodeCommit and Sauce Labs are primarily classified as "Code Collaboration & Version Control" and "Browser Testing" tools respectively.

Some of the features offered by AWS CodeCommit are:

Collaboration
Encryption
Access Control

On the other hand, Sauce Labs provides the following key features:

700+ browser/OS/device combinations for cross-browser and platform testing to improve web and mobile app quality and eliminate the overhead of internal infrastructure
Highly reliable, on-demand cloud for enterprise-grade scalability and industry standard security
Optimized for popular testing frameworks, CI systems, and surrounding tools and services

"Free private repos" is the top reason why over 39 developers like AWS CodeCommit, while over 54 developers mention "Selenium-compatible" as the leading cause for choosing Sauce Labs.

According to the StackShare community, Sauce Labs has a broader approval, being mentioned in 66 company stacks & 11 developers stacks; compared to AWS CodeCommit, which is listed in 25 company stacks and 17 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Sauce Labs, AWS CodeCommit

Rinchin

Jul 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Selenium

Sauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

217k views217k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Sauce Labs	AWS CodeCommit
Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.	CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.
700+ browser/OS/device combinations for cross-browser and platform testing to improve web and mobile app quality and eliminate the overhead of internal infrastructure; Highly reliable, on-demand cloud for enterprise-grade scalability and industry standard security; Optimized for popular testing frameworks, CI systems, and surrounding tools and services; Works with Selenium and Appium based on industry standard Selenium WebDriver protocol. Compatible with existing tests in any popular language and testing framework; Identify test failures quickly with debugging tools like screenshots, video recordings, and detailed logs	Collaboration;Encryption;Access Control;High Availability and Durability;Unlimited Repositories;Easy Access and Integration
Statistics
Stacks 314	Stacks 324
Followers 435	Followers 826
Votes 438	Votes 193
Pros & Cons
Pros 60 Selenium-compatible 46 Webdriver compatible 35 Video recordings of every test 31 Qa 29 Mobile support Cons 2 Expensive 2 Relatively slow	Pros 44 Free private repos 26 IAM integration 24 Pay-As-You-Go Pricing 20 Amazon feels the most Secure 19 Repo data encrypted at rest Cons 12 UI sucks 4 SLOW 3 No Issue Tracker 2 No fork 2 NO LFS support
Integrations
CircleCI Travis CI Appium Jenkins Selenium Visual Studio AWS Cloud9 TeamCity Applitools Bamboo	Git Jenkins

What are some alternatives to Sauce Labs, AWS CodeCommit?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Related Comparisons

Some of the features offered by AWS CodeCommit are:

Collaboration
Encryption
Access Control

On the other hand, Sauce Labs provides the following key features:

700+ browser/OS/device combinations for cross-browser and platform testing to improve web and mobile app quality and eliminate the overhead of internal infrastructure
Highly reliable, on-demand cloud for enterprise-grade scalability and industry standard security
Optimized for popular testing frameworks, CI systems, and surrounding tools and services

"Free private repos" is the top reason why over 39 developers like AWS CodeCommit, while over 54 developers mention "Selenium-compatible" as the leading cause for choosing Sauce Labs.

AWS CodeCommit vs Sauce Labs