AWS CodePipeline vs Visual Studio Code

Overview

AWS CodePipeline

Stacks551

Followers933

Votes30

Visual Studio Code

Stacks186.5K

Followers169.1K

Votes2.3K

GitHub Stars178.2K

Forks35.9K

AWS CodePipeline vs Visual Studio Code: What are the differences?

Introduction: This Markdown code provides a formatted comparison between AWS CodePipeline and Visual Studio Code, highlighting the key differences between the two tools.

Architecture and Purpose: AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed continuous delivery service that orchestrates the release pipelines for building, testing, and deploying applications, providing a seamless integration with other AWS services. On the other hand, Visual Studio Code is a source code editor that offers a wide range of extensions and features, allowing developers to edit, debug, and build applications across multiple platforms.
Cloud-Based vs. Desktop Application: AWS CodePipeline is a cloud-based service that operates entirely on AWS, providing scalability, reliability, and ease of management. On the contrary, Visual Studio Code is a desktop application that can be installed and run locally, offering flexibility and independence from an internet connection.
Automated Deployment Pipeline: CodePipeline focuses primarily on automating the deployment process by managing the release pipelines and orchestrating the build, test, and deployment stages. Visual Studio Code, however, is primarily an integrated development environment (IDE) that provides a rich set of tools and features for coding, debugging, and version control.
Integration and Extensibility: AWS CodePipeline seamlessly integrates with various AWS services, such as AWS CodeCommit, AWS CodeBuild, and AWS CodeDeploy, allowing for a streamlined automated workflow. In contrast, Visual Studio Code can be extended through numerous third-party extensions, enabling integration with different programming languages, frameworks, and external tools.
Collaboration and Project Management: AWS CodePipeline offers built-in collaboration features, including role-based access control, enabling multiple team members to work together on the same project. Visual Studio Code, while it supports remote collaboration and integration with code repositories, relies more on external project management tools and workflows.
Pricing and Cost Structure: AWS CodePipeline follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on the number of active pipelines and minutes used for executions, allowing for cost optimization and scaling based on project needs. Conversely, Visual Studio Code is free to download and use, although certain extensions or integrations might have associated costs.

In Summary, AWS CodePipeline and Visual Studio Code differ in their core architecture, purpose, deployment pipeline focus, integration capabilities, collaboration features, and cost structure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on AWS CodePipeline, Visual Studio Code

Kamaleshwar

Software Engineer at Dibiz Pte. Ltd.

Jul 8, 2020

Decided

Visual Studio Code became famous over the past 3+ years I believe. The clean UI, easy to use UX and the plethora of integrations made it a very easy decision for us. Our gripe with Sublime was probably only the UX side. VSCode has not failed us till now, and still is able to support our development env without any significant effort.

Goland being paid, as well as built only for Go seemed like a significant limitation to not consider it.

1.36M views1.36M

Comments

Samriddhi

Machine Learning Engineer at Chefling

Sep 26, 2020

Decided

Lightweight and versatile. Huge library of extensions that enable you to integrate a host of services to your development environment. VS Code's biggest strength is its library of extensions which enables it to directly compete with every single major IDE for almost all major programming languages.

1.04M views1.04M

Comments

410-Ventures

Nov 18, 2020

Review

PyCharm (pro)

great editor designed specifically for Python and python apps
complex (good for configurability, bad for simplicity)
expensive ($200 first year, $120 third year)

PyCharm (free)

same as above but without a REST client or support for other web development tools (which you will likely end up using)
ok to get your feet wet (you can always upgrade later) Full comparison: https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/features/editions_comparison_matrix.html

VS Code (free)

Configurable "IDE" with support for most modern languages
TONS of simple-to-install extensions that add functionality
Great docs and UI

Sublime Text (free)

one of the most minimal editors out there
it just works

It's really down to personal preference. But I would recommend downloading all of the FREE editors, getting setup in each, and keeping only the ones you like.

My personal choice for web development is VS Code but I started with Pycharm (free), and use Sublime text on occasion.

Just focus on learning and developing and you will find what features you're looking for.

12.1k views12.1k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

AWS CodePipeline	Visual Studio Code
CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.	Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.
Workflow Modeling;AWS Integrations;Pre-Built Plugins;Custom Plugins;Declarative Templates;Access Control	Combines UI of a modern editor with code assistance and navigation; Integrated debugging experience
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 178.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 35.9K
Stacks 551	Stacks 186.5K
Followers 933	Followers 169.1K
Votes 30	Votes 2.3K
Pros & Cons
Pros 13 Simple to set up 8 Managed service 4 GitHub integration 3 Parallel Execution 2 Automatic deployment Cons 2 No project boards 1 No integration with "Power" 365 tools	Pros 341 Powerful multilanguage IDE 310 Fast 194 Front-end develop out of the box 158 Support TypeScript IntelliSense 142 Very basic but free Cons 46 Slow startup 29 Resource hog at times 20 Poor refactoring 14 Poor UI Designer 11 Weak Ui design tools
Integrations
Runscope Amazon S3 GitHub Jenkins CloudBees BlazeMeter Ghost Inspector AWS Elastic Beanstalk Amazon EC2	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to AWS CodePipeline, Visual Studio Code?

Sublime Text

Sublime Text is available for OS X, Windows and Linux. One license is all you need to use Sublime Text on every computer you own, no matter what operating system it uses. Sublime Text uses a custom UI toolkit, optimized for speed and beauty, while taking advantage of native functionality on each platform.

Atom

At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it.

Vim

Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the de-facto Unix editor 'Vi', with a more complete feature set. Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX systems. Vim is distributed free as charityware.

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

Notepad++

Notepad++ is a free (as in "free speech" and also as in "free beer") source code editor and Notepad replacement that supports several languages. Running in the MS Windows environment, its use is governed by GPL License.

Emacs

GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more. At its core is an interpreter for Emacs Lisp, a dialect of the Lisp programming language with extensions to support text editing.

Brackets

With focused visual tools and preprocessor support, it is a modern text editor that makes it easy to design in the browser.

Neovim

Neovim is a project that seeks to aggressively refactor Vim in order to: simplify maintenance and encourage contributions, split the work between multiple developers, enable the implementation of new/modern user interfaces without any modifications to the core source, and improve extensibility with a new plugin architecture.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

AWS CodePipeline vs Visual Studio Code: What are the differences?

Introduction: This Markdown code provides a formatted comparison between AWS CodePipeline and Visual Studio Code, highlighting the key differences between the two tools.

Architecture and Purpose: AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed continuous delivery service that orchestrates the release pipelines for building, testing, and deploying applications, providing a seamless integration with other AWS services. On the other hand, Visual Studio Code is a source code editor that offers a wide range of extensions and features, allowing developers to edit, debug, and build applications across multiple platforms.
Cloud-Based vs. Desktop Application: AWS CodePipeline is a cloud-based service that operates entirely on AWS, providing scalability, reliability, and ease of management. On the contrary, Visual Studio Code is a desktop application that can be installed and run locally, offering flexibility and independence from an internet connection.
Automated Deployment Pipeline: CodePipeline focuses primarily on automating the deployment process by managing the release pipelines and orchestrating the build, test, and deployment stages. Visual Studio Code, however, is primarily an integrated development environment (IDE) that provides a rich set of tools and features for coding, debugging, and version control.
Integration and Extensibility: AWS CodePipeline seamlessly integrates with various AWS services, such as AWS CodeCommit, AWS CodeBuild, and AWS CodeDeploy, allowing for a streamlined automated workflow. In contrast, Visual Studio Code can be extended through numerous third-party extensions, enabling integration with different programming languages, frameworks, and external tools.
Collaboration and Project Management: AWS CodePipeline offers built-in collaboration features, including role-based access control, enabling multiple team members to work together on the same project. Visual Studio Code, while it supports remote collaboration and integration with code repositories, relies more on external project management tools and workflows.
Pricing and Cost Structure: AWS CodePipeline follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on the number of active pipelines and minutes used for executions, allowing for cost optimization and scaling based on project needs. Conversely, Visual Studio Code is free to download and use, although certain extensions or integrations might have associated costs.

In Summary, AWS CodePipeline and Visual Studio Code differ in their core architecture, purpose, deployment pipeline focus, integration capabilities, collaboration features, and cost structure.