StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. AWS CodeStar vs Jenkins

AWS CodeStar vs Jenkins

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
AWS CodeStar
AWS CodeStar
Stacks24
Followers171
Votes8

AWS CodeStar vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Introduction:

AWS CodeStar and Jenkins are both popular tools used for Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) in software development projects. However, they have several key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Integration with AWS Services: One of the major differences between AWS CodeStar and Jenkins is their integration with AWS services. CodeStar is a fully managed service by AWS that provides seamless integration with various AWS services, such as AWS Lambda, AWS Elastic Beanstalk, and AWS CloudFormation. On the other hand, Jenkins is an open-source automation server that can be integrated with AWS services but requires additional configurations and plugins for seamless integration.

  2. Deployment Flexibility: Another key difference between CodeStar and Jenkins is the deployment flexibility they offer. CodeStar provides an integrated approach to CI/CD by offering predefined deployment pipelines and project templates. This makes it suitable for small to medium-sized projects with standard deployment patterns. In contrast, Jenkins offers more flexibility and customization options for deployments. It allows developers to define their own deployment pipelines, choose different deployment strategies, and integrate with different tools and plugins.

  3. Ease of Use and Setup: CodeStar is designed to be user-friendly and provides a simplified setup process. It offers a web-based console where developers can easily create, configure, and manage their CI/CD pipelines. CodeStar also provides project templates designed for different programming languages and frameworks, which reduces the setup time for new projects. On the other hand, Jenkins requires manual installation and configuration on a server. It has a steeper learning curve and requires some technical expertise to set up and manage.

  4. Scalability and Performance: In terms of scalability and performance, AWS CodeStar has the advantage of being a fully managed service by AWS. It automatically scales resources based on the project's needs and provides high availability and reliability. Jenkins, being an open-source tool, requires manual scaling and configuration for optimal performance. It relies on the infrastructure it is deployed on and may require additional resources for scalability and performance enhancements.

  5. Security and Compliance: AWS CodeStar provides built-in security features and complies with several security and compliance standards, including ISO, PCI DSS, and SOC. It offers integration with other AWS security services, such as AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) and AWS Key Management Service (KMS). Jenkins, being a self-hosted tool, relies on the security measures implemented on the hosting infrastructure. It requires additional configurations and plugins to ensure security and compliance.

  6. Community and Support: Jenkins has a large and active community of users and contributors. It has a vast number of plugins and extensions developed by the community, which provides a wide range of functionalities and integrations. Jenkins also has extensive documentation and online resources available for troubleshooting and support. CodeStar, being a managed service by AWS, has limited community support compared to Jenkins. However, it benefits from the overall support and resources provided by AWS for their services.

**In Summary, AWS CodeStar and Jenkins differ in their integration with AWS services, deployment flexibility, ease of use and setup, scalability and performance, security and compliance features, and community and support. CodeStar provides a more managed and integrated approach, while Jenkins offers more customization and flexibility options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, AWS CodeStar

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
AWS CodeStar
AWS CodeStar

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Start new software projects on AWS in minutes using templates for web applications, web services and more.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
Start developing on AWS in minutes;Manage software delivery in one place;Work across your team securely;Choose from a variety of project templates
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
24
Followers
50.4K
Followers
171
Votes
2.2K
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Lack of support
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
Pros
  • 3
    Simple to set up
  • 2
    Manual Steps Available
  • 1
    GitHub integration
  • 1
    Integrations
  • 1
    Flexible
Integrations
No integrations available
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Jira
Jira

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, AWS CodeStar?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot