Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AWS CodeStar vs Jenkins: What are the differences?
Introduction:
AWS CodeStar and Jenkins are both popular tools used for Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) in software development projects. However, they have several key differences that set them apart from each other.
Integration with AWS Services: One of the major differences between AWS CodeStar and Jenkins is their integration with AWS services. CodeStar is a fully managed service by AWS that provides seamless integration with various AWS services, such as AWS Lambda, AWS Elastic Beanstalk, and AWS CloudFormation. On the other hand, Jenkins is an open-source automation server that can be integrated with AWS services but requires additional configurations and plugins for seamless integration.
Deployment Flexibility: Another key difference between CodeStar and Jenkins is the deployment flexibility they offer. CodeStar provides an integrated approach to CI/CD by offering predefined deployment pipelines and project templates. This makes it suitable for small to medium-sized projects with standard deployment patterns. In contrast, Jenkins offers more flexibility and customization options for deployments. It allows developers to define their own deployment pipelines, choose different deployment strategies, and integrate with different tools and plugins.
Ease of Use and Setup: CodeStar is designed to be user-friendly and provides a simplified setup process. It offers a web-based console where developers can easily create, configure, and manage their CI/CD pipelines. CodeStar also provides project templates designed for different programming languages and frameworks, which reduces the setup time for new projects. On the other hand, Jenkins requires manual installation and configuration on a server. It has a steeper learning curve and requires some technical expertise to set up and manage.
Scalability and Performance: In terms of scalability and performance, AWS CodeStar has the advantage of being a fully managed service by AWS. It automatically scales resources based on the project's needs and provides high availability and reliability. Jenkins, being an open-source tool, requires manual scaling and configuration for optimal performance. It relies on the infrastructure it is deployed on and may require additional resources for scalability and performance enhancements.
Security and Compliance: AWS CodeStar provides built-in security features and complies with several security and compliance standards, including ISO, PCI DSS, and SOC. It offers integration with other AWS security services, such as AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) and AWS Key Management Service (KMS). Jenkins, being a self-hosted tool, relies on the security measures implemented on the hosting infrastructure. It requires additional configurations and plugins to ensure security and compliance.
Community and Support: Jenkins has a large and active community of users and contributors. It has a vast number of plugins and extensions developed by the community, which provides a wide range of functionalities and integrations. Jenkins also has extensive documentation and online resources available for troubleshooting and support. CodeStar, being a managed service by AWS, has limited community support compared to Jenkins. However, it benefits from the overall support and resources provided by AWS for their services.
**In Summary, AWS CodeStar and Jenkins differ in their integration with AWS services, deployment flexibility, ease of use and setup, scalability and performance, security and compliance features, and community and support. CodeStar provides a more managed and integrated approach, while Jenkins offers more customization and flexibility options.
We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.
If your source code is on GitHub, also take a look at Github actions. https://github.com/features/actions
I'm open to anything. just want something that break less and doesn't need me to pay for it, and can be hosted on Docker. our scripting language is powershell core. so it's better to support it. also we are building dotnet core in our pipeline, so if they have anything related that helps with the CI would be nice.
Google cloud build can help you. It is hosted on cloud and also provide reasonable free quota.
I'm planning to setup complete CD-CD setup for spark and python application which we are going to deploy in aws lambda and EMR Cluster. Which tool would be best one to choose. Since my company is trying to adopt to concourse i would like to understand what are the lack of capabilities concourse have . Thanks in advance !
I would definetly recommend Concourse to you, as it is one of the most advanced modern methods of making CI/CD while Jenkins is an old monolithic dinosaur. Concourse itself is cloudnative and containerbased which helps you to build simple, high-performance and scalable CI/CD pipelines. In my opinion, the only lack of skills you have with Concourse is your own knowledge of how to build pipelines and automate things. Technincally there is no lack, i would even say you can extend it way more easily. But as a Con it is more easy to interact with Jenkins if you are only used to UIs. Concourse needs someone which is capable of using CLIs.
From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"
We use CircleCI because of the better value it provides in its plans. I'm sure we could have used Travis just as easily but we found CircleCI's pricing to be more reasonable. In the two years since we signed up, the service has improved. CircleCI is always innovating and iterating on their platform. We have been very satisfied.
As the maintainer of the Karate DSL open-source project - I found Travis CI very easy to integrate into the GitHub workflow and it has been steady sailing for more than 2 years now ! It works well for Java / Apache Maven projects and we were able to configure it to use the latest Oracle JDK as per our needs. Thanks to the Travis CI team for this service to the open-source community !
I use Google Cloud Build because it's my first foray into the CICD world(loving it so far), and I wanted to work with something GCP native to avoid giving permissions to other SaaS tools like CircleCI and Travis CI.
I really like it because it's free for the first 120 minutes, and it's one of the few CICD tools that enterprises are open to using since it's contained within GCP.
One of the unique things is that it has the Kaniko cache, which speeds up builds by creating intermediate layers within the docker image vs. pushing the full thing from the start. Helpful when you're installing just a few additional dependencies.
Feel free to checkout an example: Cloudbuild Example
I use Travis CI because of various reasons - 1. Cloud based system so no dedicated server required, and you do not need to administrate it. 2. Easy YAML configuration. 3. Supports Major Programming Languages. 4. Support of build matrix 6. Supports AWS, Azure, Docker, Heroku, Google Cloud, Github Pages, PyPi and lot more. 7. Slack Notifications.
You are probably looking at another hosted solution: Jenkins is a good tool but it way too work intensive to be used as just a backup solution.
I have good experience with Circle-CI, Codeship, Drone.io and Travis (as well as problematic experiences with all of them), but my go-to tool is Gitlab CI: simple, powerful and if you have problems with their limitations or pricing, you can always install runners somewhere and use Gitlab just for scheduling and management. Even if you don't host your git repository at Gitlab, you can have Gitlab pull changes automatically from wherever you repo lives.
If you are considering Jenkins I would recommend at least checking out Buildkite. The agents are self-hosted (like Jenkins) but the interface is hosted for you. It meshes up some of the things I like about hosted services (pipeline definitions in YAML, managed interface and authentication) with things I like about Jenkins (local customizable agent images, secrets only on own instances, custom agent level scripts, sizing instances to your needs).
Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.
CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.
And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.
Pros of AWS CodeStar
- Simple to set up3
- Manual Steps Available2
- Flexible1
- Integrations1
- GitHub integration1
Pros of Jenkins
- Hosted internally523
- Free open source469
- Great to build, deploy or launch anything async318
- Tons of integrations243
- Rich set of plugins with good documentation211
- Has support for build pipelines111
- Easy setup68
- It is open-source66
- Workflow plugin53
- Configuration as code13
- Very powerful tool12
- Many Plugins11
- Continuous Integration10
- Great flexibility10
- Git and Maven integration is better9
- 100% free and open source8
- Github integration7
- Slack Integration (plugin)7
- Easy customisation6
- Self-hosted GitLab Integration (plugin)6
- Docker support5
- Pipeline API5
- Fast builds4
- Platform idnependency4
- Hosted Externally4
- Excellent docker integration4
- It`w worked3
- Customizable3
- Can be run as a Docker container3
- It's Everywhere3
- JOBDSL3
- AWS Integration3
- Easily extendable with seamless integration2
- PHP Support2
- Build PR Branch Only2
- NodeJS Support2
- Ruby/Rails Support2
- Universal controller2
- Loose Coupling2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of AWS CodeStar
Cons of Jenkins
- Workarounds needed for basic requirements13
- Groovy with cumbersome syntax10
- Plugins compatibility issues8
- Lack of support7
- Limited abilities with declarative pipelines7
- No YAML syntax5
- Too tied to plugins versions4
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is AWS CodeStar?
What is Jenkins?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use AWS CodeStar?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with AWS CodeStar?
What tools integrate with Jenkins?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+7
+4
+7
+4
+17
+22
+42
+37