StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. AWS Copilot vs Docker Compose

AWS Copilot vs Docker Compose

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Stacks22.3K
Followers16.5K
Votes501
GitHub Stars36.4K
Forks5.5K
AWS Copilot
AWS Copilot
Stacks13
Followers21
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.7K
Forks435

AWS Copilot vs Docker Compose: What are the differences?

Introduction

AWS Copilot and Docker Compose are both tools that help manage containers and applications, but they have some key differences in their functionality and capabilities.

  1. Deployment Environments: While Docker Compose is primarily focused on local development and testing environments, AWS Copilot is designed specifically for deploying and managing containerized applications in an AWS cloud environment. It provides seamless integration with various AWS services and supports deployment to different AWS regions.

  2. Orchestration Capabilities: Docker Compose is mainly used for orchestrating and managing multiple containers on a single host machine, while AWS Copilot extends this capability to manage containerized applications across a cluster of AWS resources. It can easily handle scaling, load balancing, and fault tolerance of containerized applications in an AWS environment.

  3. Infrastructure Provisioning: Docker Compose requires manual provisioning and setup of infrastructure resources such as virtual machines and networks. On the other hand, AWS Copilot automates the provisioning of infrastructure resources by integrating with AWS CloudFormation. It automatically creates and manages the required AWS resources based on the application's configuration.

  4. Integration with AWS Services: AWS Copilot seamlessly integrates with various AWS services such as Amazon ECS (Elastic Container Service), AWS Fargate, and AWS App Runner. It provides easy configuration and deployment of these services, enabling developers to take advantage of the rich ecosystem of AWS services for their containerized applications. Docker Compose, on the other hand, does not directly integrate with AWS services and relies on additional tools or configurations to achieve similar functionality.

  5. Management and Monitoring: AWS Copilot includes built-in features for managing and monitoring containerized applications deployed in an AWS environment. It provides logging and metrics aggregation, as well as integration with AWS CloudWatch for monitoring and alerts. Docker Compose, on the other hand, does not offer built-in management and monitoring capabilities and requires the use of additional tools or configurations to achieve similar functionality.

  6. Multi-region Deployment: AWS Copilot supports deployment to multiple AWS regions, allowing for better availability and disaster recovery strategies. Docker Compose, on the other hand, is primarily focused on single-machine deployments and does not have built-in support for multi-region deployments.

In Summary, AWS Copilot and Docker Compose have key differences in their deployment environments, orchestration capabilities, infrastructure provisioning, integration with AWS services, management and monitoring features, and multi-region deployment support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Docker Compose
Docker Compose
AWS Copilot
AWS Copilot

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

It is a tool for developers to develop, release, and operate production-ready containerized applications on Amazon ECS. From getting started, pushing to staging and releasing to production, Copilot can help manage the entire lifecycle of your application development.

-
Organize all your related micro-services in one application; Set up test and production environments, across regions and accounts; Set up production-ready, scalable ECS services and infrastructure; Set up CI/CD Pipelines for all of the micro-services; Monitor and debug your services from your terminal
Statistics
GitHub Stars
36.4K
GitHub Stars
3.7K
GitHub Forks
5.5K
GitHub Forks
435
Stacks
22.3K
Stacks
13
Followers
16.5K
Followers
21
Votes
501
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 123
    Multi-container descriptor
  • 110
    Fast development environment setup
  • 79
    Easy linking of containers
  • 68
    Simple yaml configuration
  • 60
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 9
    Tied to single machine
  • 5
    Still very volatile, changing syntax often
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Linux
Linux
AWS Fargate
AWS Fargate
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to Docker Compose, AWS Copilot?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana