StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Media Processing
  4. Media Transcoding
  5. AWS Elemental MediaLive vs GStreamer

AWS Elemental MediaLive vs GStreamer

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS Elemental MediaLive
AWS Elemental MediaLive
Stacks20
Followers45
Votes0
GStreamer
GStreamer
Stacks50
Followers82
Votes4

AWS Elemental MediaLive vs GStreamer: What are the differences?

Introduction

AWS Elemental MediaLive and GStreamer are both powerful tools used in video streaming and processing. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between them that set them apart.

1. Scalability and Elasticity: AWS Elemental MediaLive is a cloud-based service that offers high scalability and elasticity, allowing users to easily scale up or down based on demand. On the other hand, GStreamer is a framework that runs on a single server, limiting its scalability and elasticity capabilities.

2. Ease of Use: AWS Elemental MediaLive provides a user-friendly interface and a well-documented API, making it easy for users to set up and manage video streams. GStreamer, on the other hand, requires more technical expertise and customization as it is a low-level framework.

3. Managed Service vs Open Source: AWS Elemental MediaLive is a managed service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), meaning that AWS takes care of infrastructure management, updates, and maintenance. GStreamer, on the other hand, is an open-source framework, which gives users more control and flexibility but also requires them to handle infrastructure setup and maintenance themselves.

4. Wide Range of Features: With AWS Elemental MediaLive, users can take advantage of a range of built-in features such as encoding, transcoding, and packaging. GStreamer is a more flexible framework that allows users to customize their workflows and add specific features as needed.

5. Cost: AWS Elemental MediaLive is a paid service, and users are billed based on their usage. GStreamer, being an open-source framework, is free to use, making it a more cost-effective option for certain use cases.

6. Integration with Other AWS Services: AWS Elemental MediaLive seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like AWS Elemental MediaPackage and AWS Elemental MediaStore, making it easier for users to build end-to-end video workflows. GStreamer, being a standalone framework, requires additional integration efforts to achieve similar functionality.

In Summary, AWS Elemental MediaLive offers scalability, ease of use, managed service, built-in features, and AWS service integration, while GStreamer offers flexibility, customization, open-source nature, cost savings, and wider range of capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS Elemental MediaLive
AWS Elemental MediaLive
GStreamer
GStreamer

AWS Elemental MediaLive is a broadcast-grade live video processing service. It lets you create high-quality video streams for delivery to broadcast televisions and internet-connected multiscreen devices, like connected TVs, tablets, smart phones, and set-top boxes.

It is a library for constructing graphs of media-handling components. The applications it supports range from simple Ogg/Vorbis playback, audio/video streaming to complex audio (mixing) and video (non-linear editing) processing.

Comprehensive video standards support; Broadcast capabilities for live video streams; Automated resource provisioning; Automated high availability; Flexible workflows; Use independently or with other AWS media services
Multiplatform; Comprehensive Core Library; Intelligent Plugin Architecture; Broad Coverage of Multimedia Technologies; Extensive Development Tools
Statistics
Stacks
20
Stacks
50
Followers
45
Followers
82
Votes
0
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Ease of use
  • 1
    Open Source
  • 1
    Cross Platform
Integrations
AWS Elemental MediaConvert
AWS Elemental MediaConvert
AWS Elemental MediaPackage
AWS Elemental MediaPackage
AWS Elemental MediaStore
AWS Elemental MediaStore
AWS Elemental MediaTailor
AWS Elemental MediaTailor
Amazon CloudFront
Amazon CloudFront
Linux
Linux
Windows
Windows

What are some alternatives to AWS Elemental MediaLive, GStreamer?

Cloudinary

Cloudinary

Cloudinary is a cloud-based service that streamlines websites and mobile applications' entire image and video management needs - uploads, storage, administration, manipulations, and delivery.

imgix

imgix

imgix is the leading platform for end-to-end visual media processing. With robust APIs, SDKs, and integrations, imgix empowers developers to optimize, transform, manage, and deliver images and videos at scale through simple URL parameters.

OpenCV

OpenCV

OpenCV was designed for computational efficiency and with a strong focus on real-time applications. Written in optimized C/C++, the library can take advantage of multi-core processing. Enabled with OpenCL, it can take advantage of the hardware acceleration of the underlying heterogeneous compute platform.

ImageKit

ImageKit

ImageKit offers a real-time URL-based API for image & video optimization, streaming, and 50+ transformations to deliver perfect visual experiences on websites and apps. It also comes integrated with a Digital Asset Management solution.

Cloudimage

Cloudimage

Effortless image resizing, optimization and CDN delivery. Make your site fully responsive and really fast.

scikit-image

scikit-image

scikit-image is a collection of algorithms for image processing.

Zencoder

Zencoder

Zencoder downloads the video and converts it to as many formats as you need. Every output is encoded concurrently, with virtually no waiting—whether you do one or one hundred. Zencoder then uploads the resulting videos to a server, CDN, an S3 bucket, or wherever you dictate in your API call.

Kraken.io

Kraken.io

It supports JPEG, PNG and GIF files. You can optimize your images in two ways - by providing an URL of the image you want to optimize or by uploading an image file directly to its API.

ImageEngine

ImageEngine

ImageEngine is an intelligent Image CDN that dynamically optimizes image content tailored to the end users device. Using device intelligence at the CDN edge, developers can greatly simplify their image management process while accelerating their site.

FFMPEG

FFMPEG

The universal multimedia toolkit.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase