AWS WAF vs Google Cloud Endpoints

Overview

Google Cloud Endpoints

Stacks36

Followers149

Votes1

AWS WAF

Stacks164

Followers191

Votes0

AWS WAF vs Google Cloud Endpoints: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between AWS WAF and Google Cloud Endpoints. Both AWS WAF and Google Cloud Endpoints are web security solutions offered by their respective cloud providers. However, there are several key differences between the two.

Integration with Cloud Platform Services: AWS WAF is tightly integrated with various AWS services, such as Amazon CloudFront and Application Load Balancer, providing seamless protection for web applications deployed on the AWS infrastructure. On the other hand, Google Cloud Endpoints is designed specifically for securing APIs built on the Google Cloud Platform, leveraging its identity and access management features.
Pricing Model: AWS WAF offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, allowing users to pay based on the number of web requests they receive and the rules they configure. In contrast, Google Cloud Endpoints follows a different pricing model, charging users based on the number of API calls made to the endpoints, along with additional charges for features like request/response validation and monitoring.
Managed Rule Sets: AWS WAF provides managed rule sets that are pre-configured with rules to protect against common web attack patterns, such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS). These rule sets are regularly updated by AWS to adapt to emerging threats. In comparison, Google Cloud Endpoints does not offer managed rule sets. The users have to define their own set of security rules as per their requirements.
Deployment Flexibility: AWS WAF can be deployed in multiple regions across the AWS global infrastructure, allowing organizations to protect their applications closer to their end-users. In contrast, Google Cloud Endpoints is limited to the regions where the Google Cloud Platform is available.
Support for Serverless Architectures: AWS WAF provides seamless integration with AWS Lambda, enabling organizations to protect their serverless workloads from web-based attacks. Google Cloud Endpoints, on the other hand, is not explicitly designed for serverless architectures and does not offer built-in integration with serverless compute services.
Scalability: Both AWS WAF and Google Cloud Endpoints are designed to handle high traffic volumes, but AWS WAF offers more flexibility when it comes to scaling. AWS WAF can automatically scale its resources based on the incoming traffic patterns, ensuring optimal performance and protection. Google Cloud Endpoints also supports scalability but may have limitations compared to the AWS WAF.

**In Summary, AWS WAF and Google Cloud Endpoints differ in terms of integration with cloud platform services, pricing models, availability of managed rule sets, deployment flexibility, support for serverless architectures, and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud Endpoints	AWS WAF
An NGINX-based proxy and distributed architecture give unparalleled performance and scalability. Using an Open API Specification or one of our API frameworks, Cloud Endpoints gives you the tools you need for every phase of API development and provides insight with Google Cloud Monitoring, Cloud Trace, Google Cloud Logging and Cloud Trace.	AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect your web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources.
Statistics
Stacks 36	Stacks 164
Followers 149	Followers 191
Votes 1	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Android Integration	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Google App Engine Google Compute Engine Google Kubernetes Engine	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Endpoints, AWS WAF?

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Related Comparisons

AWS WAF vs Google Cloud Endpoints: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Integration with Cloud Platform Services: AWS WAF is tightly integrated with various AWS services, such as Amazon CloudFront and Application Load Balancer, providing seamless protection for web applications deployed on the AWS infrastructure. On the other hand, Google Cloud Endpoints is designed specifically for securing APIs built on the Google Cloud Platform, leveraging its identity and access management features.
Pricing Model: AWS WAF offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, allowing users to pay based on the number of web requests they receive and the rules they configure. In contrast, Google Cloud Endpoints follows a different pricing model, charging users based on the number of API calls made to the endpoints, along with additional charges for features like request/response validation and monitoring.
Managed Rule Sets: AWS WAF provides managed rule sets that are pre-configured with rules to protect against common web attack patterns, such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS). These rule sets are regularly updated by AWS to adapt to emerging threats. In comparison, Google Cloud Endpoints does not offer managed rule sets. The users have to define their own set of security rules as per their requirements.
Deployment Flexibility: AWS WAF can be deployed in multiple regions across the AWS global infrastructure, allowing organizations to protect their applications closer to their end-users. In contrast, Google Cloud Endpoints is limited to the regions where the Google Cloud Platform is available.
Support for Serverless Architectures: AWS WAF provides seamless integration with AWS Lambda, enabling organizations to protect their serverless workloads from web-based attacks. Google Cloud Endpoints, on the other hand, is not explicitly designed for serverless architectures and does not offer built-in integration with serverless compute services.
Scalability: Both AWS WAF and Google Cloud Endpoints are designed to handle high traffic volumes, but AWS WAF offers more flexibility when it comes to scaling. AWS WAF can automatically scale its resources based on the incoming traffic patterns, ensuring optimal performance and protection. Google Cloud Endpoints also supports scalability but may have limitations compared to the AWS WAF.

AWS WAF vs Google Cloud Endpoints

Overview