StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtual Machine Management
  5. Azk vs Vagrant vs boot2docker

Azk vs Vagrant vs boot2docker

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vagrant
Vagrant
Stacks11.9K
Followers7.8K
Votes1.5K
boot2docker
boot2docker
Stacks263
Followers211
Votes95
GitHub Stars8.3K
Forks1.3K
Azk
Azk
Stacks11
Followers31
Votes3
GitHub Stars894
Forks55

Azk vs Vagrant vs boot2docker: What are the differences?

  1. Scalability: Azk allows for better scalability compared to Vagrant and boot2docker as it supports container orchestration with Docker Compose and Kubernetes, making it easier to manage multiple containers across different environments.
  2. Resource Efficiency: Vagrant creates full-size virtual machines, consuming more resources, while Azk and boot2docker use lightweight containers, resulting in better resource efficiency and quicker startup times.
  3. Native Integration: Azk is designed to work seamlessly with Docker, leveraging its full functionality, while Vagrant requires additional plugins for Docker support, and boot2docker is a separate lightweight operating system specifically for Docker.
  4. Configuration Management: Azk offers a more streamlined and simplified configuration process compared to Vagrant and boot2docker, making it easier for developers to set up and manage their development environments.
  5. Community Support: Vagrant has a larger community and more extensive documentation compared to Azk and boot2docker, making it easier for users to find help, resources, and solutions to common issues.
  6. Cross-platform Compatibility: Vagrant is compatible with a wider range of operating systems compared to Azk and boot2docker, offering more flexibility for developers working on different platforms.

In Summary, Azk offers better scalability, resource efficiency, native integration with Docker, simplified configuration management, and a growing community compared to Vagrant and boot2docker.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Vagrant
Vagrant
boot2docker
boot2docker
Azk
Azk

Vagrant provides the framework and configuration format to create and manage complete portable development environments. These development environments can live on your computer or in the cloud, and are portable between Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.

boot2docker is a lightweight Linux distribution based on Tiny Core Linux made specifically to run Docker containers. It runs completely from RAM, weighs ~27MB and boots in ~5s (YMMV).

azk lets developers easily and quickly install and configure development environments on their computers.

Boxes;Up And SSH;Synced Folders;Provisioning;Networking;Share;Teardown;Rebuild;Providers
Kernel 3.14.1 with AUFS, Docker 0.10.1, LXC 0.8.0;Container persistence via disk automount on /var/lib/docker;SSH keys persistence via disk automount
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.3K
GitHub Stars
894
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.3K
GitHub Forks
55
Stacks
11.9K
Stacks
263
Stacks
11
Followers
7.8K
Followers
211
Followers
31
Votes
1.5K
Votes
95
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 352
    Development environments
  • 290
    Simple bootstraping
  • 237
    Free
  • 139
    Boxes
  • 130
    Provisioning
Cons
  • 2
    Multiple VMs quickly eat up disk space
  • 2
    Can become v complex w prod. provisioner (Salt, etc.)
  • 1
    Development environment that kills your battery
Pros
  • 43
    Lightweight
  • 35
    Use docker when it's not natively possible
  • 11
    Use it for fast demo without big image
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Containers
Pros
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Preview and use ANY project, hassle-free
Integrations
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
HP Cloud Compute
HP Cloud Compute
Joyent Cloud
Joyent Cloud
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Rackspace Cloud Servers
SoftLayer
SoftLayer
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
Docker
Docker
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
Redis
Redis
Crystal
Crystal
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Docker
Docker
Ruby
Ruby
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Golang
Golang
NGINX
NGINX

What are some alternatives to Vagrant, boot2docker, Azk?

Otto

Otto

Otto automatically builds development environments without any configuration; it can detect your project type and has built-in knowledge of industry-standard tools to setup a development environment that is ready to go. When you're ready to deploy, otto builds and manages an infrastructure, sets up servers, builds, and deploys the application.

libvirt

libvirt

It is an open-source API, daemon and management tool for managing platform virtualization. It can be used to manage KVM, Xen, VMware ESXi, QEMU and other virtualization technologies.

XenServer

XenServer

It is a leading virtualization management platform optimized for application, desktop and server virtualization infrastructures. It is used in the world's largest clouds and enterprises.

VMware ESXi

VMware ESXi

It is a bare metal hypervisor that installs easily on to your server and partitions it into multiple virtual machines. It effectively partitions hardware to consolidate applications and cut costs.

Xen Orchestra

Xen Orchestra

It provides a web based UI for the management of XenServer installations without requiring any agent or extra software on your hosts nor VMs.

PuPHPet

PuPHPet

It is a web application that allows you to easily and quickly generate custom Vagrant and Puppet controlled virtual machines.

KubeVirt

KubeVirt

It addresses the needs of development teams that have adopted or want to adopt Kubernetes but possess existing Virtual Machine-based workloads that cannot be easily containerized. More specifically, the technology provides a unified development platform where developers can build, modify, and deploy applications residing in both Application Containers as well as Virtual Machines in a common, shared environment.

Azure Arc

Azure Arc

It offers simplified management, faster app development, and consistent Azure services. Easily organize, govern, and secure Windows, Linux, SQL Server, and Kubernetes clusters across data centers, the edge, and multi-cloud environments right from Azure. Architect, design, and build cloud-native apps anywhere without sacrificing central visibility and control. Get Azure innovation and cloud benefits by deploying consistent Azure data, application, and machine learning services on any infrastructure.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana