Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Azure Cognitive Search vs Elasticsearch: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Azure Cognitive Search and Elasticsearch are two popular search engines used for indexing and querying data. While they both provide search capabilities, there are certain key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore and compare these differences in detail.
Scalability and Performance: One key difference between Azure Cognitive Search and Elasticsearch is their scalability and performance capabilities. Azure Cognitive Search is a fully managed service that offers automatic scaling and load balancing, making it easier to handle large amounts of data and queries without worrying about infrastructure management. On the other hand, Elasticsearch offers distributed architecture and sharding, allowing for horizontal scaling across multiple nodes. This gives Elasticsearch the advantage of being able to handle massive volumes of data and perform fast searches in real-time.
Data Integration and Ecosystem: Another significant difference lies in the data integration and ecosystem support. Azure Cognitive Search is tightly integrated with other Azure services, providing seamless integration with Azure Storage, Azure SQL Database, and other Azure resources. It also supports various connectors for common data sources like SharePoint and SQL Server. In contrast, Elasticsearch is part of the ELK stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana) and offers integration with a wide range of technologies and tools. It has extensive support for data ingestion, log parsing, and visualization through Logstash and Kibana, making it a popular choice in log analytics and monitoring use cases.
Document Processing and Enrichment: Azure Cognitive Search provides built-in AI capabilities for document processing and enrichment. It offers language detection, entity recognition, key phrase extraction, and sentiment analysis out of the box. This allows users to extract valuable insights from unstructured data and leverage AI features without the need for additional services or custom code. On the other hand, Elasticsearch does not offer these built-in AI capabilities. However, it provides powerful text analysis features like tokenization, stemming, and synonym expansion, which can be used to enhance search results and perform linguistic processing.
Managed Service vs. Self-Hosting: Azure Cognitive Search is a fully managed service provided by Microsoft, which means all the infrastructure management, updates, and maintenance tasks are handled by Microsoft. This makes it an ideal choice for organizations looking for a hassle-free search solution with minimal maintenance overhead. Elasticsearch, on the other hand, is open source and can be self-hosted on-premises or on cloud infrastructure. While self-hosting provides more control, it requires additional effort in terms of setup, configuration, and ongoing management.
Query and Filtering Capabilities: Both Azure Cognitive Search and Elasticsearch provide rich query and filtering capabilities. However, there are some differences in their query DSL (Domain-Specific Language) syntax and supported features. Azure Cognitive Search uses the simple query syntax by default, which is easier to use for basic text searches. Elasticsearch, on the other hand, offers a powerful query DSL that allows for complex queries, aggregations, and filters. It also provides advanced features like scoring, relevance tuning, and geo-spatial search, giving users more flexibility and control over their search queries.
Pricing Model: The pricing model is another difference between Azure Cognitive Search and Elasticsearch. Azure Cognitive Search follows a consumption-based pricing model, where you pay for the resources used, including indexing, searching, and storage. The pricing is transparent and predictable, making it easier to estimate costs. Elasticsearch, on the other hand, is open source and free to use. However, if you opt for managed Elasticsearch services like Amazon Elasticsearch Service or Elastic Cloud, you will incur costs based on the instance size, storage, and data transfer.
In summary, the key differences between Azure Cognitive Search and Elasticsearch include scalability and performance, data integration and ecosystem support, document processing and enrichment capabilities, managed service vs. self-hosting, query and filtering capabilities, and pricing models. These differences make them suitable for different use cases and requirements.
Hey everybody! (1) I am developing an android application. I have data of around 3 million record (less than a TB). I want to save that data in the cloud. Which company provides the best cloud database services that would suit my scenario? It should be secured, long term useable, and provide better services. I decided to use Firebase Realtime database. Should I stick with Firebase or are there any other companies that provide a better service?
(2) I have the functionality of searching data in my app. Same data (less than a TB). Which search solution should I use in this case? I found Elasticsearch and Algolia search. It should be secure and fast. If any other company provides better services than these, please feel free to suggest them.
Thank you!
Hi Rana, good question! From my Firebase experience, 3 million records is not too big at all, as long as the cost is within reason for you. With Firebase you will be able to access the data from anywhere, including an android app, and implement fine-grained security with JSON rules. The real-time-ness works perfectly. As a fully managed database, Firebase really takes care of everything. The only thing to watch out for is if you need complex query patterns - Firestore (also in the Firebase family) can be a better fit there.
To answer question 2: the right answer will depend on what's most important to you. Algolia is like Firebase is that it is fully-managed, very easy to set up, and has great SDKs for Android. Algolia is really a full-stack search solution in this case, and it is easy to connect with your Firebase data. Bear in mind that Algolia does cost money, so you'll want to make sure the cost is okay for you, but you will save a lot of engineering time and never have to worry about scale. The search-as-you-type performance with Algolia is flawless, as that is a primary aspect of its design. Elasticsearch can store tons of data and has all the flexibility, is hosted for cheap by many cloud services, and has many users. If you haven't done a lot with search before, the learning curve is higher than Algolia for getting the results ranked properly, and there is another learning curve if you want to do the DevOps part yourself. Both are very good platforms for search, Algolia shines when buliding your app is the most important and you don't want to spend many engineering hours, Elasticsearch shines when you have a lot of data and don't mind learning how to run and optimize it.
Rana - we use Cloud Firestore at our startup. It handles many million records without any issues. It provides you the same set of features that the Firebase Realtime Database provides on top of the indexing and security trims. The only thing to watch out for is to make sure your Cloud Functions have proper exception handling and there are no infinite loop in the code. This will be too costly if not caught quickly.
For search; Algolia is a great option, but cost is a real consideration. Indexing large number of records can be cost prohibitive for most projects. Elasticsearch is a solid alternative, but requires a little additional work to configure and maintain if you want to self-host.
Hope this helps.
Pros of Azure Cognitive Search
- 1111
Pros of Elasticsearch
- Powerful api328
- Great search engine315
- Open source231
- Restful214
- Near real-time search200
- Free98
- Search everything85
- Easy to get started54
- Analytics45
- Distributed26
- Fast search6
- More than a search engine5
- Great docs4
- Awesome, great tool4
- Highly Available3
- Easy to scale3
- Potato2
- Document Store2
- Great customer support2
- Intuitive API2
- Nosql DB2
- Great piece of software2
- Reliable2
- Fast2
- Easy setup2
- Open1
- Easy to get hot data1
- Github1
- Elaticsearch1
- Actively developing1
- Responsive maintainers on GitHub1
- Ecosystem1
- Not stable1
- Scalability1
- Community0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Azure Cognitive Search
Cons of Elasticsearch
- Resource hungry7
- Diffecult to get started6
- Expensive5
- Hard to keep stable at large scale4